Developing region-specific fragility function for predicting probability of liquefaction induced ground failure

被引:9
作者
Ge, Yixun [1 ]
Zhang, Zechao [2 ]
Zhang, Jie [1 ]
Huang, Hongwei [1 ]
机构
[1] Tongji Univ, Dept Geotech Engn, Key Lab Geotech & Underground Engn, Minist Educ, 1239 Siping Rd, Shanghai 200092, Peoples R China
[2] China Three Gorges Corp, Inst Sci & Technol, Beijing 100038, Peoples R China
关键词
Soil liquefaction; Model uncertainty; Failure probability; Hierarchical Bayesian Model; CHI-CHI EARTHQUAKE; POTENTIAL INDEX; CROSS-VALIDATION; CPT; VARIABILITY; CALIBRATION; CHARLESTON; SEVERITY; NUMBER; SITE;
D O I
10.1016/j.probengmech.2022.103381
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
The liquefaction potential index (LPI) has been widely used to develop fragility function for predicting the liquefaction-induced ground failure. As the fragility function tends to vary from one region to another, it is best developed based on region-specific data. When the amount of region-specific data is limited, how to develop the region-specific fragility curve is a challenging problem. In this study, a Hierarchical Bayesian Model (HBM) is suggested for developing region-specific fragility functions based on LPI, which can systematically consider the effects of the amount and characteristics of the local data as well as the data from other regions. The suggested method is illustrated with an example. It is shown that the HBM outperforms the lumped parameter model (LPM) which does not consider the inter-region variability of the fragility curves. When the amount of region-specific data is large, the fragility function developed based on the HBM is very close to that developed based on the independent parameter model (IPM), which constructs a region-specific fragility function utilizing only the region-specific data. When the region-specific data is not enough, the HBM also outperforms the IPM through borrowing information from other regions.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]  
Bauer R.A., SEISMOL RES LETT
[2]  
Betancourt M, 2018, Arxiv, DOI [arXiv:1701.02434, DOI 10.48550/ARXIV.1701.02434]
[3]   CPT-Based Liquefaction Triggering Procedure [J].
Boulanger, Ross W. ;
Idriss, I. M. .
JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2016, 142 (02)
[4]   Hierarchical Bayesian approaches to statistical modelling of geotechnical data [J].
Bozorgzadeh, Nezam ;
Bathurst, Richard J. .
GEORISK-ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT OF RISK FOR ENGINEERED SYSTEMS AND GEOHAZARDS, 2022, 16 (03) :452-469
[5]   Bayesian analysis for estimating statistical parameter distributions of elasto-viscoplastic material models [J].
Chakraborty, Aritra ;
Messner, M. C. .
PROBABILISTIC ENGINEERING MECHANICS, 2021, 66
[6]   Calibration of reliability-based resistance factors for flush drilled soil anchors in taipei basin [J].
Ching, Jianye ;
Liao, Hung-Jiun ;
Sue, Chia-Wei .
JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2008, 134 (09) :1348-1363
[7]   Quasi-site-specific prediction for deformation modulus of rock mass [J].
Ching, Jianye ;
Phoon, Kok-Kwang ;
Ho, Yuan-Hsun ;
Weng, Meng-Chia .
CANADIAN GEOTECHNICAL JOURNAL, 2021, 58 (07) :936-951
[8]   Application of the transitional Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm to probabilistic site characterization [J].
Ching, Jianye ;
Wang, Jiun-Shiang .
ENGINEERING GEOLOGY, 2016, 203 :151-167
[9]   Deterministic and Probabilistic Assessment of Liquefaction Hazards Using the Liquefaction Potential Index and Liquefaction Reduction Number [J].
Chung, Jaewon ;
Rogers, J. David .
JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2017, 143 (10)
[10]   Probabilistic liquefaction hazard maps for Memphis, Tennessee [J].
Cramer, Chris H. ;
Rix, Glenn J. ;
Tucker, Kathleen .
SEISMOLOGICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2008, 79 (03) :416-423