Measurement of Project Portfolio Benefits With a GA-BP Neural Network Group

被引:18
作者
Bai, Libiao [1 ]
An, Yuqin [1 ]
Sun, Yichen [2 ]
机构
[1] Changan Univ, Xian 710000, Peoples R China
[2] Politecn Milan, I-20133 Milan, Italy
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Portfolios; Current measurement; Weight measurement; Particle measurements; Numerical models; Neurons; Atmospheric measurements; Benefits management (BM); genetic algorithm (GA)-BP neural network group (GA-BPNNG); project portfolio (PP); project portfolio benefits (PPBs) measurement; synergy benefits; CONCEPTUAL-FRAMEWORK; MANAGEMENT; PREDICTION; SUCCESS; REALIZATION; GOVERNANCE; SELECTION; IMPACT; INTERDEPENDENCIES; STAKEHOLDERS;
D O I
10.1109/TEM.2023.3236956
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
To facilitate the project portfolio benefits (PPB) management and realize the maximization of the benefits, a PPB measurement model based on the genetic algorithm (GA)-BP neural network group (GA-BPNNG) is proposed in current research. Unlike traditional benefits management approaches, the proposed model takes full cooperation and information sharing advantages of group learning to measure PPB more accurately, which considers both the financial and nonfinancial benefits and synergy benefits generated from the interrelationships among project portfolio components. To ascertain the priority of the PPB measurement model, the GA-BPNNG model is compared with BPNN and GA-BPNN, two common models in the literature. The mean square error of the GA-BPNNG model reduced by 94% and 83%, respectively, when compared to the BPNN and GA-BPNN models. The results suggest that the PPB measurement model performs more effectively. Therefore, it could be concluded that the proposed model has a better nonlinear fitting effect for PPB measurement. This article can support managers, decision-makers, and management in realizing strategy by providing a practical and scalable tool for PPB measurement.
引用
收藏
页码:4737 / 4749
页数:13
相关论文
共 74 条
[41]  
Momeni E, 2015, EARTH SCI RES J, V19, P85, DOI 10.15446/esrj.v19n1.38712
[42]   Measurement issues in the evaluation of projects in a project portfolio [J].
Morton, Alec .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2015, 245 (03) :789-796
[43]   Modeling projects interdependencies to measure their synergic impacts on a project portfolio [J].
Nabati, Mohammad Mahdi ;
Ashrafi, Maryam .
JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2021, 6 (03) :143-156
[44]   How to Achieve Effectiveness in Project Portfolio Management [J].
Patanakul, Peerasit .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 2022, 69 (04) :987-999
[45]   Fuzzy risk analysis using area and height based similarity measure on generalized trapezoidal fuzzy numbers and its application [J].
Patra, Kartik ;
Mondal, Shyamal Kumar .
APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2015, 28 :276-284
[46]   Multi-mode project portfolio selection and scheduling in a build-operate-transfer environment [J].
Ranjbar, Mojtaba ;
Nasiri, Mohammad Mahdi ;
Torabi, S. Ali .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2022, 189
[47]   A comprehensive mathematical model for resource-constrained multi-objective project portfolio selection and scheduling considering sustainability and projects splitting [J].
RezaHoseini, Ali ;
Ghannadpour, Seyed Farid ;
Hemmati, Maryam .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 269
[48]   Online multi-criteria portfolio analysis through compromise programming models built on the underlying principles of fuzzy outranking [J].
Rivera, Gilberto ;
Florencia, Rogelio ;
Guerrero, Mario ;
Porras, Raul ;
Sanchez-Solis, J. Patricia .
INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2021, 580 :734-755
[49]   Benefits Realisation Management and its influence on project success and on the execution of business strategies [J].
Serra, Carlos Eduardo Martins ;
Kunc, Martin .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2015, 33 (01) :53-66
[50]   Front End Projects Benefits Realisation from a Requirements Management Perspective-A Systematic Literature Review [J].
Serugga, Joas ;
Kagioglou, Mike ;
Tzortzopoulos, Patricia .
BUILDINGS, 2020, 10 (05)