Measurement of Project Portfolio Benefits With a GA-BP Neural Network Group

被引:18
作者
Bai, Libiao [1 ]
An, Yuqin [1 ]
Sun, Yichen [2 ]
机构
[1] Changan Univ, Xian 710000, Peoples R China
[2] Politecn Milan, I-20133 Milan, Italy
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Portfolios; Current measurement; Weight measurement; Particle measurements; Numerical models; Neurons; Atmospheric measurements; Benefits management (BM); genetic algorithm (GA)-BP neural network group (GA-BPNNG); project portfolio (PP); project portfolio benefits (PPBs) measurement; synergy benefits; CONCEPTUAL-FRAMEWORK; MANAGEMENT; PREDICTION; SUCCESS; REALIZATION; GOVERNANCE; SELECTION; IMPACT; INTERDEPENDENCIES; STAKEHOLDERS;
D O I
10.1109/TEM.2023.3236956
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
To facilitate the project portfolio benefits (PPB) management and realize the maximization of the benefits, a PPB measurement model based on the genetic algorithm (GA)-BP neural network group (GA-BPNNG) is proposed in current research. Unlike traditional benefits management approaches, the proposed model takes full cooperation and information sharing advantages of group learning to measure PPB more accurately, which considers both the financial and nonfinancial benefits and synergy benefits generated from the interrelationships among project portfolio components. To ascertain the priority of the PPB measurement model, the GA-BPNNG model is compared with BPNN and GA-BPNN, two common models in the literature. The mean square error of the GA-BPNNG model reduced by 94% and 83%, respectively, when compared to the BPNN and GA-BPNN models. The results suggest that the PPB measurement model performs more effectively. Therefore, it could be concluded that the proposed model has a better nonlinear fitting effect for PPB measurement. This article can support managers, decision-makers, and management in realizing strategy by providing a practical and scalable tool for PPB measurement.
引用
收藏
页码:4737 / 4749
页数:13
相关论文
共 74 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2021, STAND PROJ MAN GUID, V7th
[2]   Software Defect Prediction: A Comparison Between Artificial Neural Network and Support Vector Machine [J].
Arora, Ishani ;
Saha, Anju .
ADVANCED COMPUTING AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES, 2018, 562 :51-61
[3]   Using a balanced scorecard to manage corporate social responsibility [J].
Asiaei, Kaveh ;
Bontis, Nick .
KNOWLEDGE AND PROCESS MANAGEMENT, 2019, 26 (04) :371-379
[4]   Opening the Black Box of Benefits Management in the Context of Projects [J].
Aubry, Monique ;
Boukri, Sanaa El ;
Sergi, Viviane .
PROJECT MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2021, 52 (05) :434-452
[6]   The impact of organizational project benefits management governance on ERP project success: Neo-institutional theory perspective [J].
Badewi, Amgad ;
Shehab, Essam .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2016, 34 (03) :412-428
[7]   Dynamic assessment modelling for project portfolio benefits [J].
Bai, Libiao ;
Sun, Yichen ;
Shi, Huijing ;
Shi, Chunming ;
Bai, Jieyu ;
Han, Xiao .
JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 2022, 73 (07) :1596-1619
[8]   Prediction of multiproject resource conflict risk via an artificial neural network [J].
Bai, Libiao ;
Wang, Zhiguo ;
Wang, Hailing ;
Huang, Ning ;
Shi, Huijing .
ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION AND ARCHITECTURAL MANAGEMENT, 2021, 28 (10) :2857-2883
[9]   Managing project interdependencies in IT/IS project portfolios: a review of managerial issues [J].
Bathallath, Sameer ;
Smedberg, Asa ;
Kjellin, Harald .
IJISPM-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2016, 4 (01) :67-82
[10]   Behavior of internal stakeholders in project portfolio management and its impact on success [J].
Beringer, Claus ;
Jonas, Daniel ;
Kock, Alexander .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2013, 31 (06) :830-846