Amplifying the Patient Voice: A Survey of Practitioners' Use of Patient reported Outcome Measures Across Radiotherapy Providers in England

被引:7
作者
Oliver, L. A. [1 ]
Hutton, D. P. [1 ,2 ]
Hall, T. [2 ]
Cain, M. [3 ]
Bates, M. [4 ]
Cree, A. [3 ]
Mullen, E. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Liverpool, Liverpool, England
[2] Christie Hosp, North West Radiotherapy Operat Delivery Network, Manchester, England
[3] Clatterbridge Canc Ctr, Liverpool, England
[4] Norfolk & Norwich Univ Hosp, East England Radiotherapy Network, Norwich, England
关键词
Patient-reported outcomes; radiotherapy; survivorship; toxicity; IMPLEMENTATION; CARE; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.clon.2022.11.004
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Aims: The NHS England Radiotherapy Service Specification calls for routine use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). However, barriers exist at patient, healthcare professional and service levels. The aim of the present study was to determine the current use of PROMs within radiotherapy services in England. The current attitudes, barriers and enablers to the implementation of PROMs in radiotherapy practice were evaluated and practical recommendations to inform future implementation were developed.Materials and methods: A mixed-methods approach was adopted to obtain quantitative and qualitative data. An online questionnaire was developed and disseminated to all radiotherapy operational delivery network managers across England. The questionnaire consisted of 12 open and closed questions relating to PROMs use, with the option to provide free-text responses. Inductive thematic analysis was conducted on free-text comments, whereas descriptive statistics were used to analyse quantitative data.Results: In total, 182 responses were received from 40 of the 50 radiotherapy providers, resulting in a response rate of 84%. The current use of PROMs was analysed, including rationale for use, tools used, format of PROMs collection and timing within the radiotherapy pathway. Most respondents indicated that PROMs were used in the context of clinical trials only. Through thematic analysis, four identical key themes were identified relating to both barriers and enablers to PROMs use; these included IT infrastructure, time, human/financial resources and training/education. A fifth theme, standardisation, was identified as a key enabler to PROMs use.Conclusions: Our findings show that outside of clinical trials, PROMs are not routinely used in radiotherapy services due to barriers identified at professional and service levels. Here we provide recommendations to mitigate the barriers identified and implement PROMs in radiotherapy, including training for healthcare professionals and standardisation of PROMs tools and storage. This study provides a key first step in driving PROMs implementation within radiotherapy services across England.(c) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of The Royal College of Radiologists. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:199 / 208
页数:10
相关论文
共 48 条
[41]   What is needed by staff to implement PROMs into routine oncology care? A qualitative study with the multi-disciplinary team [J].
Roberts, Natasha A. ;
Alexander, Kim ;
Wyld, David ;
Janda, Monika .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE, 2019, 28 (06)
[42]   Implementing patient-reported outcome surveys as part of routine care: lessons from an academic radiation oncology department [J].
Rotenstein, Lisa S. ;
Agarwal, Ankit ;
O'Neil, Kelly ;
Kelly, Andrea ;
Keaty, Maureen ;
Whitehouse, Colleen ;
Kalinowski, Barbara ;
Orio, Peter F., III ;
Wagle, Neil ;
Martin, Neil E. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2017, 24 (05) :964-968
[43]   Mode of administration does not cause bias in patient-reported outcome results: a meta-analysis [J].
Rutherford, Claudia ;
Costa, Daniel ;
Mercieca-Bebber, Rebecca ;
Rice, Holly ;
Gabb, Liam ;
King, Madeleine .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2016, 25 (03) :559-574
[44]   Implementation of Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes in Routine Cancer Care at an Academic Center: Identifying Opportunities and Challenges [J].
Sandhu, Sahil ;
King, Zoe ;
Wong, Michelle ;
Bissell, Sean ;
Sperling, Jessica ;
Gray, Megan ;
Ratliff, William ;
Herring, Kris ;
LeBlanc, Thomas W. .
JCO ONCOLOGY PRACTICE, 2020, 16 (11) :742-+
[45]   Finding a new normal: a grounded theory study of rehabilitation after treatment for upper gastrointestinal or gynaecological cancers - the patient's perspective [J].
Sandsund, C. ;
Pattison, N. ;
Doyle, N. ;
Shaw, C. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE, 2013, 22 (02) :232-244
[46]   Holistic needs assessment and care plans for women with gynaecological cancer: do they improve cancer-specific health-related quality of life? A randomised controlled trial using mixed methods [J].
Sandsund, Catherine ;
Towers, Richard ;
Thomas, Karen ;
Tigue, Ruth ;
Lalji, Amyn ;
Fernandes, Andreia ;
Doyle, Natalie ;
Jordan, Jake ;
Gage, Heather ;
Shaw, Clare .
BMJ SUPPORTIVE & PALLIATIVE CARE, 2020, 10 (02)
[47]  
The Independent Cancer Taskforce, ACHIEVING WORLD CLAS
[48]  
World Health Organisation (WHO), US APPR DIG TECHN PU