Do green bonds and economic policy uncertainty matter for carbon price? New insights from a TVP-VAR framework

被引:64
作者
Li, Houjian [1 ]
Li, Qingman [1 ]
Huang, Xinya [1 ]
Guo, Lili [1 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Agr Univ, Coll Econ, Chengdu 611130, Peoples R China
关键词
Economic policy uncertainty; Green bonds; Carbon price; TVP-VAR model; BVAR model; PHASE-II; EU ETS; STOCK-MARKET; TIME-SERIES; EMISSIONS; ENERGY; ELECTRICITY; EFFICIENCY; CHINA; DRIVERS;
D O I
10.1016/j.irfa.2023.102502
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Green bond shocks and economic policy uncertainty are essential factors affecting macroeconomic development and green finance. In this paper, the time-varying parameter vector autoregressive (TVP-VAR) framework is used to analyze the monthly data of China from April 2014 to March 2022 and to investigate the dynamic impact of green bond shock and economic policy uncertainty on carbon prices. The results show that economic policy uncertainty and the impact of the green bond have significant time-varying and short-term effects on carbon price. In the short term, economic policy uncertainty has a significant positive impact on carbon price most of the time, while green bond has a significant negative impact on carbon price most of the time. Meanwhile, economic policy uncertainty and the impact of green bond on carbon price in Hubei and Guangdong are heterogeneous. In addition, we also use Bayesian VAR (BVAR) model to test the robustness of the results. Based on the research results, some policy suggestions are put forward, including improving the stability of economic policies, implementing green bond support policies, and speeding up the improvement of the national unified carbon emission trading market.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 81 条
[51]   Economic policy uncertainty, energy consumption and carbon emissions in G7 countries: evidence from a panel Granger causality analysis [J].
Pirgaip, Burak ;
Dincergok, Burcu .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2020, 27 (24) :30050-30066
[52]   Time varying structural vector autoregressions and monetary policy [J].
Primiceri, GE .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 2005, 72 (03) :821-852
[53]   Are Green Bond and Carbon Markets in Europe complements or substitutes? Insights from the activity of power firms [J].
Rannou, Yves ;
Boutabba, Mohamed Amine ;
Barneto, Pascal .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2021, 104 (104)
[54]   Do green bonds de-risk investment in low-carbon stocks? [J].
Reboredo, Juan C. ;
Ugolini, Andrea ;
Ojea-Ferreiro, Javier .
ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2022, 108
[56]   The interrelationship between the carbon market and the green bonds market: Evidence from wavelet quantile-on-quantile method [J].
Ren, Xiaohang ;
Li, Yiying ;
Yan, Cheng ;
Wen, Fenghua ;
Lu, Zudi .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2022, 179
[57]   Systemic risk, economic policy uncertainty and firm bankruptcies: Evidence from multivariate causal inference [J].
Stolbov, Mikhail ;
Shchepeleva, Maria .
RESEARCH IN INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS AND FINANCE, 2020, 52
[58]   Is There an Asymmetric Relationship between Economic Policy Uncertainty, Cryptocurrencies, and Global Green Bonds? Evidence from the United States of America [J].
Syed, Aamir Aijaz ;
Ahmed, Farhan ;
Kamal, Muhammad Abdul ;
Ullah, Assad ;
Ramos-Requena, Jose Pedro .
MATHEMATICS, 2022, 10 (05)
[59]   Dependence changes between the carbon price and its fundamentals: A quantile regression approach [J].
Tan, Xue-Ping ;
Wang, Xin-Yu .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2017, 190 :306-325
[60]   Factors of carbon price volatility in a comparative analysis of the EUA and sCER [J].
Tang, Bao-jun ;
Gong, Pi-qin ;
Shen, Cheng .
ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2017, 255 (1-2) :157-168