The Integration of Cultural Ecosystem Services and Cultural Routes Based on the Sharing Paradigm

被引:0
|
作者
Gormus, Sevgi [1 ]
Yilmaz, Bulent [1 ]
Cengiz, Serhat [1 ]
机构
[1] Inonu Univ, Fac Fine Art & Design, Dept Landscape Architecture, Malatya, Turkiye
来源
FORESTIST | 2023年 / 73卷 / 01期
关键词
Cultural ecosystem services; cultural route; Malatya; sharing paradigm; sustainable tourism; Turkey; CHALLENGES; LESSONS;
D O I
10.5152/forestist.2022.22007
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
Cultural ecosystem services are ecosystem services developed on landscape aesthetics as the basis of recreation and tourism. The sharing paradigm produces the possibility of integration of the economic, spatial, and social contexts of cultural ecosystem services with cultural route planning. This study focuses on how to develop a good relationship between ecosystem services, which are named as the earth's aggregative by the sharing paradigm, and the cultural routes that put our aggregative into circulation globally. In this context, route-planning setup is suggested as a conjoint tool between ecosystem services and tourism. The aim of this study is to develop a design setup with an analysis technique to determine cultural routes with an ecosystem services approach at the provincial scale of Malatya and to evaluate the developed route set up within the scope of sharing paradigm. This study can raise awareness of connecting ecosystem services with sustainable tourism for the quality of human life and the conservation of biodiversity. In addition, it is a guide on how awareness can be integrated into the tourism planning process. The method of the research has based on determining cultural ecosystem values, clustering cultural ecosystem values and the realization of the route setup by using the corridor and network analyzes in the Geographical Information Systems software. For each action to provide a curative and supportive cultural ecosystem service, the interconnectedness between actions needs to be evaluated based on knowledge, on the ground plane, and on the possibility of benefit.
引用
收藏
页码:70 / 84
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Geopolitical imaginaries and Cultural Ecosystem Services (CES) in the desert
    Gutberlet, Manuela
    TOURISM GEOGRAPHIES, 2022, 24 (4-5) : 549 - 577
  • [22] Intangible Bonds: Cultural Ecosystem Services and Landscape Practices
    Wen, Chen
    Xu, Haiyun
    Plieninger, Tobias
    LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE FRONTIERS, 2022, 10 (05) : 4 - 7
  • [23] Integrating cultural ecosystem services in wildfire risk assessment
    Vigna, Ingrid
    Battisti, Luca
    Ascoli, Davide
    Besana, Angelo
    Pezzoli, Alessandro
    Comino, Elena
    LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2024, 243
  • [24] Cultural ecosystem services as a gateway for improving urban sustainability
    Andersson, Erik
    Tengo, Maria
    McPhearson, Timon
    Kremer, Peleg
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2015, 12 : 165 - 168
  • [25] Characterizing the cultural ecosystem services of coastal sand dunes
    Richardson, Robert B.
    Nicholls, Sarah
    JOURNAL OF GREAT LAKES RESEARCH, 2021, 47 (02) : 546 - 551
  • [26] The influence of landscape context on the production of cultural ecosystem services
    Zoeller, Kim C.
    Gurney, Georgina G.
    Cumming, Graeme S.
    LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2022, 37 (03) : 883 - 894
  • [27] Indicators of Cultural Ecosystem Services for urban planning: A review
    La Rosa, Daniele
    Spyra, Marcin
    Inostroza, Luis
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2016, 61 : 74 - 89
  • [28] Introducing accessibility analysis in mapping cultural ecosystem services
    Ala-Hulkko, Terhi
    Kotavaara, Ossi
    Alahuhta, Janne
    Helle, Pekka
    Hjort, Jan
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2016, 66 : 416 - 427
  • [29] The influence of landscape context on the production of cultural ecosystem services
    Kim C. Zoeller
    Georgina G. Gurney
    Graeme S. Cumming
    Landscape Ecology, 2022, 37 : 883 - 894
  • [30] The importance of landscape characteristics for the delivery of cultural ecosystem services
    Ridding, Lucy E.
    Redhead, John W.
    Oliver, Tom H.
    Schmucki, Reto
    McGinlay, James
    Graves, Anil R.
    Morris, Joe
    Bradbury, Richard B.
    King, Helen
    Bullock, James M.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2018, 206 : 1145 - 1154