共 42 条
Predictive Models for Length of Stay and Discharge Disposition in Elective Spine Surgery: Development, Validation, and Comparison to the ACS NSQIP Risk Calculator
被引:16
作者:
Arora, Ayush
[1
,7
]
Lituiev, Dmytro
[2
]
Jain, Deeptee
[3
]
Hadley, Dexter
[4
]
Butte, Atul J.
[2
,5
,6
]
Berven, Sigurd
[1
]
Peterson, Thomas A.
[1
,2
]
机构:
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Orthopaed Surg, San Francisco, CA USA
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Bakar Computat Hlth Sci Inst, San Francisco, CA USA
[3] Washington Univ St Louis, Dept Orthopaed Surg, St Louis, MO USA
[4] Univ Cent Florida, Dept Pathol, Orlando, FL, Uruguay
[5] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Pediat, San Francisco, CA USA
[6] Univ Calif Hlth, Ctr Data Driven Insights & Innovat, Oakland, CA USA
[7] 500 Parnassus Ave,MUW 3rd Floor, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
来源:
基金:
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词:
machine learning;
preoperative optimization;
complications;
internal validation;
deformity;
cervical degenerative;
lumbar degenerative;
NONROUTINE DISCHARGE;
COMPLICATIONS;
DEFORMITY;
PATIENT;
IMPACT;
INDEX;
D O I:
10.1097/BRS.0000000000004490
中图分类号:
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号:
摘要:
Study Design.A retrospective study at a single academic institution. Objective.The purpose of this study is to utilize machine learning to predict hospital length of stay (LOS) and discharge disposition following adult elective spine surgery, and to compare performance metrics of machine learning models to the American College of Surgeon's National Surgical Quality Improvement Program's (ACS NSQIP) prediction calculator. Summary of Background Data.A total of 3678 adult patients undergoing elective spine surgery between 2014 and 2019, acquired from the electronic health record. Methods.Patients were divided into three stratified cohorts: cervical degenerative, lumbar degenerative, and adult spinal deformity groups. Predictive variables included demographics, body mass index, surgical region, surgical invasiveness, surgical approach, and comorbidities. Regression, classification trees, and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) were used to build predictive models. Validation of the models was conducted on 16% of patients (N=587), using area under the receiver operator curve (AUROC), sensitivity, specificity, and correlation. Patient data were manually entered into the ACS NSQIP online risk calculator to compare performance. Outcome variables were discharge disposition (home vs. rehabilitation) and LOS (days). Results.Of 3678 patients analyzed, 51.4% were male (n=1890) and 48.6% were female (n=1788). The average LOS was 3.66 days. In all, 78% were discharged home and 22% discharged to rehabilitation. Compared with NSQIP (Pearson R-2=0.16), the predictions of poisson regression (R-2=0.29) and LASSO (R-2=0.29) models were significantly more correlated with observed LOS (P=0.025 and 0.004, respectively). Of the models generated to predict discharge location, logistic regression yielded an AUROC of 0.79, which was statistically equivalent to the AUROC of 0.75 for NSQIP (P=0.135). Conclusion.The predictive models developed in this study can enable accurate preoperative estimation of LOS and risk of rehabilitation discharge for adult patients undergoing elective spine surgery. The demonstrated models exhibited better performance than NSQIP for prediction of LOS and equivalent performance to NSQIP for prediction of discharge location.
引用
收藏
页码:E1 / E13
页数:13
相关论文