When public administration education switches online: Student perceptions during COVID-19

被引:7
作者
Rawat, Stuti [1 ]
Yan, Yifei [2 ,3 ]
Wu, Alfred M. [4 ]
Vyas, Lina [1 ]
机构
[1] Educ Univ Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] London Sch Econ & Polit Sci, London, England
[3] Univ Southampton, Southampton, Hants, England
[4] Natl Univ Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
关键词
COVID-19; higher education; online education; student perception; public administration education; Asia; TEACHING POLICY-ANALYSIS; AFFAIRS EDUCATION; DISTANCE EDUCATION; MPA PROGRAMS; ENGAGEMENT; LEADERSHIP; WIKIPEDIA; PEDAGOGY; DESIGN; TOOL;
D O I
10.1177/01447394221119092
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Public administration education is traditionally known for its emphasis on interaction, discussion and experiential learning, which require effective in-person instructions. With COVID-19 pushing many programmes across the globe to be delivered online rather than in person, how this shift has affected the student experience in public administration programmes has been a pertinent and important consideration. This paper addresses the question through two surveys of 147 students in total, at a graduate-level public policy school in Singapore. Two distinctive waves of data collection allow us to capture a nuanced picture of student perceptions both when online teaching was introduced as an emergency response and when it was planned as a deliberate strategy later on. Our findings suggest that students consistently reported a decline in participation and interaction in an online setting, compared with a face-to-face setting. Our study fills a critical gap in the literature related to online public administration education in Asia, while the immediate constraints it highlights and lessons it offers on maintaining a highly interactive and engaging public administration education are likely to apply for educators elsewhere both during and beyond the COVID-19 era.
引用
收藏
页码:122 / 142
页数:21
相关论文
共 68 条
[21]   Zoom Exhaustion & Fatigue Scale [J].
Fauville, G. ;
Luo, M. ;
Queiroz, A. C. M. ;
Bailenson, J. N. ;
Hancock, J. .
COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR REPORTS, 2021, 4
[22]   Teaching public administration: Key themes 1996-2016 [J].
Fenwick, John .
TEACHING PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2018, 36 (01) :6-13
[23]   Public Policy Pedagogy: Mixing Methodologies Using Cases [J].
Foster, Richard H. ;
McBeth, Mark K. ;
Clemons, Randy S. .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS EDUCATION, 2010, 16 (04) :517-540
[24]   Experiential Learning in MPA Programs: A Case for Complementarity between Internship and Service Learning Requirements [J].
Gerlach, John David ;
Reinagel, Tyler P. .
PS-POLITICAL SCIENCE & POLITICS, 2016, 49 (01) :132-138
[25]   Creating Quality Online Course Design Through a Peer-Reviewed Assessment [J].
Gibson, Pamela A. ;
Dunning, Pamela Trump .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS EDUCATION, 2012, 18 (01) :209-228
[26]   Online Education in Public Affairs: Current State and Emerging Issues [J].
Ginn, Martha H. ;
Hammond, Augustine .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS EDUCATION, 2012, 18 (02) :247-270
[27]  
Gosen J., 2004, Simulation & Gaming, V35, P270, DOI 10.1177/1046878104263544
[28]   An Analysis of Response Rate and Economic Costs Between Mail and Web-Based Surveys Among Practicing Dentists: A Randomized Trial [J].
Hardigan, Patrick C. ;
Succar, Claudia Tammy ;
Fleisher, Jay M. .
JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2012, 37 (02) :383-394
[29]  
Hartnett M., 2016, MOTIVATION ONLINE ED, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-981-10-0700-2_2, 10.1007/978-981-10-0700-2_2]
[30]  
Harvard University, 2021, COVID 19 INF