A Survey of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network on Approaches Toward Addressing Patients' Transportation Insecurity

被引:13
作者
Chaiyachati, Krisda H. [1 ]
Krause, Diana [2 ]
Sugalski, Jessica [2 ]
Graboyes, Evan M. [3 ]
Shulman, Lawrence N. [4 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Verily Life Sci, San Francisco, CA USA
[2] Natl Comprehens Canc Network, Plymouth Meeting, PA USA
[3] Med Univ South Carolina, Charleston, SC USA
[4] Univ Penn, Perelman Sch Med, Philadelphia, PA USA
[5] Univ Penn, Penn Ctr Canc Care Innovat, Philadelphia, PA USA
[6] Univ Penn, Abramson Canc Ctr, Philadelphia, PA USA
来源
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE CANCER NETWORK | 2023年 / 21卷 / 01期
关键词
RISK SCREENING ACCEPTABILITY; BARRIERS; CARE;
D O I
10.6004/jnccn.2022.7073
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Addressing patients' social determinants of health is a national priority for cancer treatment centers. Transportation insecurity is one major challenge for patients undergoing active cancer treatment, and missing treatments can result in worse cancer treatment outcomes, including worse morbidity and mortality. How cancer treatment centers are addressing transportation insecurity is understudied. Methods: In January and February 2022, the NCCN Best Practices Committee conducted a survey of NCCN's 31 Member Institutions (currently 32 member institutions as of April 2022) to assess how centers were addressing patient transportation insecurity: how they screen for transportation insecurity, coordinate transportation, and fund transportation initiatives, and their plans to address transportation insecurity in the future. Results: A total of 25 of 31 (81%) NCCN Member Institutions responded to the survey, of which 24 (96%) reported supporting the transportation needs of their patients through screening, coordinating, and/or funding transportation. Patients' transportation needs were most often identified by social workers (96%), clinicians (83%), or patients self-declaring their needs (79%). Few centers (33%) used routine screening approaches (eg, universal screening of social risk factors) to systematically identify transportation needs, and 54% used the support of technology platforms or a vendor to coordinate transportation. Transportation was predominantly funded via some combination of philanthropy (88%), grants (63%), internal dollars (63%), and reimbursement from insurance companies (58%). Over the next 12 months, many centers were either going to continue their current transportation programs in their current state (60%) or expand existing programs (32%). Conclusions: Many NCCN Member Institutions are addressing the transportation needs of their patients. Current efforts are heterogeneous. Few centers have systematic, routine screening approaches, and funding relies on philanthropy more so than institutional dollars or reimbursement from insurers. Opportunities exist to establish more structured, scalable, and sustainable programs for patients' transportation needs.
引用
收藏
页码:21 / 26
页数:6
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Meanings and Misunderstandings: A Social Determinants of Health Lexicon for Health Care Systems [J].
Alderwick, Hugh ;
Gottlieb, Laura M. .
MILBANK QUARTERLY, 2019, 97 (02) :407-419
[2]   Patient navigator reported patient barriers and delivered activities in two large federally-funded cancer screening programs [J].
Barrington, Wendy E. ;
DeGroff, Amy ;
Melillo, Stephanie ;
Thuy Vu ;
Cole, Allison ;
Escoffery, Cam ;
Askelson, Natoshia ;
Seegmiller, Laura ;
Gonzalez, Sarah Koopman ;
Hannon, Peggy .
PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2019, 129
[3]   Financial Toxicity Among Patients with Prostate, Bladder, and Kidney Cancer: A Systematic Review and Call to Action [J].
Bhanvadia, Sumeet K. ;
Psutka, Sarah P. ;
Burg, Madeleine L. ;
de Wit, Ronald ;
Dhillon, Haryana M. ;
Gyawali, Bishal ;
Morgans, Alicia K. ;
Goldstein, Daniel A. ;
Smith, Angela B. ;
Sun, Maxine ;
Penson, David F. .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2021, 4 (03) :396-404
[4]   Part II: A Qualitative Study of Social Risk Screening Acceptability in Patients and Caregivers [J].
Byhoff, Elena ;
De Marchis, Emilia H. ;
Hessler, Danielle ;
Fichtenberg, Caroline ;
Adler, Nancy ;
Cohen, Alicia J. ;
Doran, Kelly M. ;
de Cuba, Stephanie Ettinger ;
Fleegler, Eric W. ;
Gavin, Nicholas ;
Huebschmann, Amy G. ;
Lindau, Stacy Tessler ;
Tung, Elizabeth L. ;
Raven, Maria ;
Jepson, Susan ;
Johnson, Wendy ;
Olson, Ardis L. ;
Sandel, Megan ;
Sheward, Richard S. ;
Gottlieb, Laura M. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2019, 57 (06) :S38-S46
[5]  
Damico N, 2020, INT J RADIAT ONCOL, V108, pE388
[6]  
De Marchis EH, 2019, AM J PREV MED, V57, pS25, DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2019.07.010
[7]   Modeling the Structural Relationships between Travel Distance, Built Environment, and Cancer Outcomes [J].
Etminani-Ghasrodashti, Roya ;
Khan, Muhammad Arif ;
Mozaffarian, Ladan .
JOURNAL OF URBAN PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT, 2022, 148 (03)
[8]   Investigating the Role of Transportation Barriers in Cancer Patients' Decision Making Regarding the Treatment Process [J].
Etminani-Ghasrodashti, Roya ;
Kan, Chen ;
Mozaffarian, Ladan .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2021, 2675 (06) :175-187
[9]   Prevalence of Screening for Food Insecurity, Housing Instability, Utility Needs, Transportation Needs, and Interpersonal Violence by US Physician Practices and Hospitals [J].
Fraze, Taressa K. ;
Brewster, Amanda L. ;
Lewis, Valerie A. ;
Beidler, Laura B. ;
Murray, Genevra F. ;
Colla, Carrie H. .
JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2019, 2 (09)
[10]   Screening for Social Determinants of Health [J].
Gottlieb, Laura ;
Fichtenberg, Caroline ;
Adler, Nancy .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2016, 316 (23) :2552-2552