The impact of cognitive and motivational resources on engagement with automated formative feedback

被引:3
作者
Barkela, Veronika [1 ]
Schmitt, Lukas [1 ]
Leuchter, Miriam [1 ]
机构
[1] RPTU Kaiserslautern Landau, Inst Children & Youth Educ, August Croissant Str 5, D-76829 Landau, Germany
关键词
Feedback engagement; Expectancy-value theory; Mental effort; Automated formative feedback; Summarization; Pre-service teacher students; TASK VALUES; SELF-EFFICACY; STUDENT ENGAGEMENT; COMPETENCE BELIEFS; ACHIEVEMENT; EXPECTANCY; PERFORMANCE; LOAD; INVOLVEMENT; ACCEPTANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.cedpsych.2023.102234
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
The effectiveness of automated formative feedback highly depends on student feedback engagement that is largely determined by learners' cognitive and motivational resources. Yet, most studies have only investigated either cognitive resources (e.g., mental effort), or motivational resources (e.g., expectancy-value-cost variables). The purpose of this study is to examine the development (indicated by time) and relationship of 1) cognitive, 2) affective, and 3) behavioral feedback engagement as a function of cognitive and motivational resources in a computer-based learning environment with automated formative feedback. Data was collected from N = 330 German B.Ed. Elementary Education students who worked four consecutive sessions on summarizing texts. Previously invested mental effort (t -1) affected situational expectancy and cost but not situational value. 1) Cognitive feedback engagement was positively associated with previous performance but neither associated with cognitive nor motivational resources. 2) Affective feedback engagement was positively associated with intrinsic value and negatively associated with situational expectancies, invested mental effort and previous performance. 3) Behavioral feedback engagement was positively associated with situational expectancies and invested mental effort. This study contributes to the understanding of student's cognitive and motivational structures when engaging with automated formative feedback.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 77 条
  • [1] Student engagement with feedback and attainment: the role of academic self-efficacy
    Adams, Anne-Marie
    Wilson, Hannah
    Money, Julie
    Palmer-Conn, Susan
    Fearn, Jamie
    [J]. ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2020, 45 (02) : 317 - 329
  • [2] Identifying predictors of students' perception of and engagement with assessment feedback
    Ali, Nadia
    Ahmed, Lubna
    Rose, Sarah
    [J]. ACTIVE LEARNING IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2018, 19 (03) : 239 - 251
  • [3] Alipio M., 2020, Education & Administration, DOI DOI 10.35542/OSF.IO/PRA6Z
  • [4] Barkela V., Effectiveness of automated formative feedback in an online tutorial for promoting summarizing
  • [5] Barron K. E., 2015, International Encyclopedia of Social & Behavioral Sciences, P503, DOI [DOI 10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.26099-6, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-08-0970868.26099-6]
  • [6] Beliefs about sources of knowledge predict motivation for learning in teacher education
    Braten, Ivar
    Ferguson, Leila E.
    [J]. TEACHING AND TEACHER EDUCATION, 2015, 50 : 13 - 23
  • [7] Investigating Instruction for Improving Revision of Argumentative Essays
    Butler, Jodie A.
    Britt, M. Anne
    [J]. WRITTEN COMMUNICATION, 2011, 28 (01) : 70 - 96
  • [8] Darby A., 2013, COLL STUD J, V47, P185
  • [9] In-the-Moment Profiles of Expectancies, Task Values, and Costs
    Dietrich, Julia
    Moeller, Julia
    Guo, Jiesi
    Viljaranta, Jaana
    Kracke, Baerbel
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 10
  • [10] Situational expectancies and task values: Associations with students' effort
    Dietrich, Julia
    Viljaranta, Jaana
    Moeller, Julia
    Kracke, Baerbel
    [J]. LEARNING AND INSTRUCTION, 2017, 47 : 53 - 64