Shaping the future of Ethereum: exploring energy consumption in Proof-of-Work and Proof-of-Stake consensus

被引:15
|
作者
Asif, Rameez [1 ]
Hassan, Syed Raheel [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ East Anglia, Sch Comp Sci, Norwich, England
来源
FRONTIERS IN BLOCKCHAIN | 2023年 / 6卷
关键词
blockchain; Ethereum; Bitcoin; cryptocurrencies; cybersecuriy; cryptography; security; privacy; BLOCKCHAIN; ARCHITECTURE;
D O I
10.3389/fbloc.2023.1151724
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Ethereum (ETH) is a popular Layer-1 blockchain platform that has been used to create decentralized applications (dApps) and smart contracts. Ethereum 2.0, or Serenity, is a significant update to the network that intends to address numerous issues with scalability, security, and energy efficiency. The Proof-of-Stake (PoS) consensus method will replace the Proof-of-Work (PoW) mechanism, which is one of the major new features of Ethereum 2.0. Given that PoS doesn't require miners to do intensive mathematical calculations in order to validate transactions, it has the potential to be more energy-efficient than PoW. Additionally, this Ethereum upgrade will also be more secure due to the introduction of a new mechanism called "Casper" that will ensure that validators are always in agreement on the state of the blockchain. The paper begins by discussing the current issues facing Ethereum, including the limitations of the Proof of Work (PoW) consensus mechanism and the need for more efficient and scalable solutions. In this study, we peered at the major changes introduced by Ethereum 2.0, such as the new consensus method (Proof-of-Stake) and the addition of shard chains (Ethereum 2.0), as well as the associated development timelines, benefits and the community criticism on this upgrade.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] RDV: An Alternative To Proof-of-Work And A Real Decentralized Consensus For Blockchain
    Solat, Siamak
    BLOCKSYS'18: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 1ST BLOCKCHAIN-ENABLED NETWORKED SENSOR SYSTEMS, 2018, : 25 - 32
  • [32] Do crypto investors care about energy use and climate change? Evidence from Ethereum's transition to proof-of-stake
    Baur, Dirk G.
    Karlsen, Jonathan R.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2024, 369
  • [33] Green-PoW: An energy-efficient blockchain Proof-of-Work consensus algorithm
    Lasla, Noureddine
    Al-Sahan, Lina
    Abdallah, Mohamed
    Younis, Mohamed
    COMPUTER NETWORKS, 2022, 214
  • [34] Modeling the Impact of Network Connectivity on Consensus Security of Proof-of-Work Blockchain
    Xiao, Yang
    Zhang, Ning
    Lou, Wenjing
    Hou, Y. Thomas
    IEEE INFOCOM 2020 - IEEE CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER COMMUNICATIONS, 2020, : 1648 - 1657
  • [35] WARChain: Consensus-based trust in web archives via proof-of-stake blockchain technology
    Lendak, Imre
    Indig, Balazs
    Palko, Gabor
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER SECURITY, 2022, 30 (03) : 499 - 515
  • [36] ASIC-Resistance of Multi-Hash Proof-of-Work Mechanisms for Blockchain Consensus Protocols
    Cho, Hyungmin
    IEEE ACCESS, 2018, 6 : 66210 - 66222
  • [37] The flip side of the coin: Exploring the environmental and health impacts of proof-of-work cryptocurrency mining
    Tayebi, Shali
    Amini, Heresh
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2024, 252
  • [38] Serious Game for Blockchain Education Purposes (using Proof-of-Work consensus of Bitcoin)
    Oktian, Yustus Eko
    Singgih, Ivan Kristianto
    Ferdinand, Friska Natalia
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2019 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NEW MEDIA STUDIES (CONMEDIA 2019), 2019, : 177 - 183
  • [39] A fuzzy dematel-based delegated Proof-of-Stake consensus mechanism for medical model fusion on blockchain
    Li, Zhi
    Liang, Fuhe
    Li, Ming
    ADVANCED ENGINEERING INFORMATICS, 2025, 64
  • [40] Lay Down the Common Metrics: Evaluating Proof-of-Work Consensus Protocols' Security
    Zhang, Ren
    Preneel, Bart
    2019 IEEE SYMPOSIUM ON SECURITY AND PRIVACY (SP 2019), 2019, : 175 - 192