PI-RADS-Based Segmented Threshold of PSMA-PET SUVmax Is Better than Traditional Fixed Threshold for Diagnosing Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Especially for PI-RADS 3 Lesions

被引:6
作者
Meng, Xiaoli [1 ]
Ma, Wenhui [1 ]
Zhang, Jingliang [2 ]
Quan, Zhiyong [1 ]
Zhang, Mingru [1 ]
Ye, Jiajun [1 ]
Shu, Jun [3 ]
Ren, Jing [3 ]
Qin, Weijun [2 ]
Kang, Fei [1 ]
Wang, Jing [1 ]
机构
[1] Fourth Mil Med Univ, Xijing Hosp, Dept Nucl Med, Xian, Peoples R China
[2] Fourth Mil Med Univ, Xijing Hosp, Dept Urol, Xian, Peoples R China
[3] Fourth Mil Med Univ, Xijing Hosp, Dept Radiol, Xian, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Prostate-specific membrane antigen; Positron emission tomography; Multi-parametric MRI; Prostate cancer; GA-68-PSMA PET/CT; MULTIPARAMETRIC MRI; VALIDATION; ACCURACY; BENIGN; TRUS; ISUP;
D O I
10.1007/s11307-023-01841-6
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
ObjectivesOur purpose was to compare the performance of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-positron emission tomography (PET) traditional fixed threshold (FT) and newly established Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS)-based segmented threshold (ST) for diagnosing clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa).MethodsThe study retrospectively included 218 patients who underwent multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and PSMA-PET examination for suspected prostate cancer (PCa) from January 2018 to November 2021. Lesions with Gleason score & GE; 3 + 4 were diagnosed as csPCa. In PSMA-PET maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), the FT for all the lesions and STs for lesions with different PI-RADS score for diagnosing csPCa were determined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves analysis and compared with Z test. The McNemar test was used to compare sensitivity and specificity.ResultsAmong the 218 patients, there were 113 csPCa and 105 non-csPCa. The PSMA-PET FT was SUVmax > 5.3 (area under the curve, AUC = 0.842) and STs for PI-RADS 3/4/5 were SUVmax > 4.2/5.7/6.0 (AUCs = 0.870/0.867/0.882), respectively. The AUC of PSMA-PET ST was higher than that of PSMA-PET FT (0.872 vs. 0.842), especially for PI-RADS 3 (0.870 vs. 0.653). Multimodality diagnostic criteria combining PSMA-PET ST and PI-RADS scores of mpMRI was established and its AUC was higher than that of PSMA-PET ST (0.893 vs. 0.872) and significantly higher than that of PSMA-PET FT (0.893 vs. 0.842) with an improvement in sensitivity (93% vs. 78%, p < 0.05) without significantly sacrificing specificity (86% vs. 91%, p > 0.05).ConclusionsFor diagnosing csPCa, PI-RADS-based PSMA-PET segmented threshold achieved better performance than traditional fixed threshold, especially for PI-RADS 3 lesions. Multimodality diagnostic criteria demonstrated higher diagnostic performance than segmented threshold and significantly better than PSMA-PET fixed threshold for detecting csPCa.
引用
收藏
页码:887 / 896
页数:10
相关论文
共 39 条
[31]   Usefulness of free PSA ratio to enhance detection of clinically significant prostate cancer in patients with PI-RADS<3 and PSA≤10 [J].
Heo, Ji Eun ;
Han, Hyun Ho ;
Jang, Won Sik ;
Ham, Won Sik ;
Han, Woong Kyu ;
Choi, Young Deuk ;
Lee, Jongsoo .
PROSTATE INTERNATIONAL, 2025, 13 (02) :112-115
[32]   Clinical -Prostate cancer Multicenter analysis of clinical and MRI characteristics associated with detecting clinically significant prostate cancer in PI-RADS (v2.0) category 3 lesions [J].
Al Awamlh, Bashir Al Hussein ;
Marks, Leonard S. ;
Sonn, Geoffrey A. ;
Natarajan, Shyam ;
Fan, Richard E. ;
Gross, Michael D. ;
Mauer, Elizabeth ;
Banerjee, Samprit ;
Hectors, Stefanie ;
Carlsson, Sigrid ;
Margolis, Daniel J. ;
Hu, Jim C. .
UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2020, 38 (07)
[33]   Development and Validation of Interpretable Machine Learning Models for Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Diagnosis in Patients With Lesions of PI-RADS v2.1 Score ≥3 [J].
Ruan, Mingjian ;
Liu, Yi ;
Yao, Kaifeng ;
Wang, Kexin ;
Fan, Yu ;
Wu, Shiliang ;
Wang, Xiaoying .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2024, 60 (05) :2130-2141
[34]   Avoiding Unnecessary Systematic Biopsy in Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: Comparison Between MRI-Based Radiomics Model and PI-RADS Category [J].
Cheng, Xueqing ;
Chen, Yuntian ;
Xu, Hui ;
Ye, Lei ;
Tong, Shun ;
Li, Haixia ;
Zhang, Tianjing ;
Tian, Song ;
Qi, Jin ;
Zeng, Hao ;
Yao, Jin ;
Song, Bin .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2023, 57 (02) :578-586
[35]   The role of the size and number of index lesion in the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer in patients with PI-RADS 4 lesions who underwent in-bore MRI-guided prostate biopsy [J].
Mert Kilic ;
Serdar Madendere ;
Metin Vural ;
Ersin Koseoglu ;
Mevlana Derya Balbay ;
Tarik Esen .
World Journal of Urology, 2023, 41 :449-454
[36]   The role of the size and number of index lesion in the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer in patients with PI-RADS 4 lesions who underwent in-bore MRI-guided prostate biopsy [J].
Kilic, Mert ;
Madendere, Serdar ;
Vural, Metin ;
Koseoglu, Ersin ;
Balbay, Mevlana Derya ;
Esen, Tarik .
WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2023, 41 (02) :449-454
[37]   Association Between Tumor Multifocality on Multi-parametric MRI and Detection of Clinically-Significant Prostate Cancer in Lesions with Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) Score 4 [J].
Ghabili, Kamyar ;
Swallow, Matthew ;
Sherrer, Rachael L. ;
Syed, Jamil S. ;
Khajir, Ghazal ;
Gordetsky, Jennifer B. ;
Leapman, Michael S. ;
Rais-Bahrami, Soroush ;
Sprenkle, Preston C. .
UROLOGY, 2019, 134 :173-180
[38]   Pharmacokinetic modeling of dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MRI in PI-RADS category 3 peripheral zone lesions: preliminary study evaluating DCE-MRI as an imaging biomarker for detection of clinically significant prostate cancers [J].
Abreu-Gomez, Jorge ;
Lim, Christopher ;
Cron, Gregory O. ;
Krishna, Satheesh ;
Sadoughi, Nima ;
Schieda, Nicola .
ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2021, 46 (09) :4370-4380
[39]   Pharmacokinetic modeling of dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MRI in PI-RADS category 3 peripheral zone lesions: preliminary study evaluating DCE-MRI as an imaging biomarker for detection of clinically significant prostate cancers [J].
Jorge Abreu-Gomez ;
Christopher Lim ;
Gregory O. Cron ;
Satheesh Krishna ;
Nima Sadoughi ;
Nicola Schieda .
Abdominal Radiology, 2021, 46 :4370-4380