共 50 条
A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase IIa trial of efruxifermin for patients with compensated NASH cirrhosis
被引:49
|作者:
Harrison, Stephen A.
[1
]
Ruane, Peter J.
[2
]
Freilich, Bradley
[3
]
Neff, Guy
Patil, Rashmee
Behling, Cynthia
[4
]
Hu, Chen
[5
,7
]
Shringarpure, Reshma
[6
,8
]
de Temple, Brittany
[6
,8
]
Fong, Erica
[6
,8
]
Tillman, Erik J.
[6
,8
]
Rolph, Timothy
[6
,8
]
Cheng, Andrew
[6
,8
]
Yale, Kitty
[8
,9
]
机构:
[1] Pinnacle Clin Res, San Antonio, TX USA
[2] Ruane Clin Res Grp Inc, Los Angeles, CA USA
[3] Kansas City Res Inst, Kansas City, MO USA
[4] Covenant Metab Specialists LLC, Sarasota, FL USA
[5] South Texas Res Inst, Edinburg, TX USA
[6] Univ Calif San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
[7] MedPace INC, Cincinnati, OH USA
[8] Akero Therapeut, South San Francisco, CA 94080 USA
[9] 601 Gateway Blvd,Suite 350, South San Francisco, CA 94080 USA
来源:
关键词:
FATTY LIVER-DISEASE;
IMPROVES INSULIN SENSITIVITY;
BONE TURNOVER MARKERS;
FIBROSIS STAGE;
NONALCOHOLIC STEATOHEPATITIS;
PEGBELFERMIN BMS-986036;
BODY-WEIGHT;
FGF21;
FIBROGENESIS;
ASSOCIATION;
D O I:
10.1016/j.jhepr.2022.100563
中图分类号:
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号:
摘要:
Background & Aims: Efruxifermin has shown clinical efficacy in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and F1- F3 fibrosis. The primary objective of the BALANCED Cohort C was to assess the safety and tolerability of efruxifermin in patients with compensated NASH cirrhosis. Methods: Patients with NASH and stage 4 fibrosis (n = 30) were randomized 2:1 to receive efruxifermin 50 mg (n = 20) or placebo (n = 10) once-weekly for 16 weeks. The primary endpoint was safety and tolerability of efruxifermin. Secondary and exploratory endpoints included evaluation of non-invasive markers of liver injury and fibrosis, glucose and lipid metabolism, and changes in histology in a subset of patients who consented to end-of-study liver biopsy. Results: Efruxifermin was safe and well-tolerated; most adverse events (AEs) were grade 1 (n = 7, 23.3%) or grade 2 (n = 19, 63.3%). The most frequent AEs were gastrointestinal, including transient, mild to moderate diarrhea, and/or nausea. Significant improvements were noted in key markers of liver injury (alanine aminotransferase) and glucose and lipid metabolism. Sixteen-week treatment with efruxifermin was associated with significant reductions in non-invasive markers of fibrosis including Pro-C3 (least squares mean change from baseline [LSMCFB] -9 lg/L efruxifermin vs. -3.4 lg/L placebo; p = 0.0130) and ELF score (-0.4 efruxifermin vs. +0.4 placebo; p = 0.0036), with a trend towards reduced liver stiffness (LSMCFB -5.7 kPa efruxifermin vs. -1.1 kPa placebo; n.s.). Of 12 efruxifermin-treated patients with liver biopsy after 16 weeks, 4 (33%) achieved fibrosis improvement of at least one stage without worsening of NASH, while an additional 3 (25%) achieved resolution of NASH, compared to 0 of 5 placebo-treated patients. Conclusions: Efruxifermin appeared safe and well-tolerated with encouraging improvements in markers of liver injury, fibrosis, and glucose and lipid metabolism following 16 weeks of treatment, warranting confirmation in larger and longer term studies. Lay summary: Cirrhosis resulting from non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), the progressive form of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, represents a major unmet medical need. Currently there are no approved drugs for the treatment of NASH. This proof of-concept randomized, double-blind clinical trial demonstrated the potential therapeutic benefit of efruxifermin treatment compared to placebo in patients with cirrhosis due to NASH. Clinical Trial Number: NCT03976401 & COPY; 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL). This is an access article under the CC BY license
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文