Efficacy and safety of oral versus intranasal midazolam as premedication in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:2
|
作者
Chen, Shouming [1 ,2 ]
Lang, Bingchen [2 ,3 ]
Wu, Lan [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Wensheng [4 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, West China Univ Hosp 2, Dept Anesthesiol, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, Minist Educ, Key Lab Birth Defects & Related Dis Women & Childr, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[3] Sichuan Univ, West China Univ Hosp 2, Dept Pharm, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[4] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Translat Neurosci Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol,Lab Anesthesia & Crit Care Med, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[5] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Natl Local Joint Engn Res Ctr Translat Med Anesthe, Lab Anesthesia & Crit Care Med, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[6] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Natl Local Joint Engn Res Ctr Translat Med Anesthe, Dept Anesthesiol,Lab Anesthesia & Crit Care Med, Chengdu 610000, Sichuan, Peoples R China
关键词
Midazolam; Premedication; Anesthesia; general; Meta-analysis; Randomized controlled trials as topic; PEDIATRIC-PATIENTS; DOUBLE-BLIND; DEXMEDETOMIDINE; LIDOCAINE;
D O I
10.23736/S0375-9393.22.16937-3
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
INTRODUCTION: Midazolam hydrochloride is a widely accepted benzodiazepine for premedication in pediatric pa-tients. However, there is no consistent conclusion regarding which route of administration is best. We performed a meta -analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of oral versus intranasal midazolam premedication in children.EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar databases were searched from inception to June 2022, for randomized controlled trials comparing oral versus intranasal midazolam. Primary out-comes included satisfactory mask acceptance for induction and satisfactory sedation at separation from parents. Second-ary outcomes included the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, incidence of nasal irritation, postoperative recovery time, and hemodynamic changes.EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Data from 14 studies involving a total of 901 children were obtained. The results indicated that intranasal and oral midazolam premedication in children provided similar satisfactory mask acceptance for induction (RR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.93-1.13; P=0.64; I2=0%), satisfactory sedation at separation from parents (RR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.89-1.10; P=0.90; I2=57%), and postoperative recovery time (WMD,-8.01; 95% CI,-20.16-4.14; P=0.20; I2=85%). Addition-ally, intranasal midazolam premedication was associated with lower incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (RR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.51-0.96; P=0.03; I2=0%) and shorter onset time.CONCLUSIONS: Differences between intranasal and oral midazolam in satisfactory mask acceptance for induction, sat-isfactory sedation at separation from parents, and postoperative recovery time were not significant. Intranasal midazolam premedication was associated with shorter onset time and higher incidence of nasal irritation.(Cite this article as: Chen S, Lang B, Wu L, Zhang W. Efficacy and safety of oral versus intranasal midazolam as pre-medication in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Minerva Anestesiol 2023;89:331-40. DOI: 10.23736/S0375-9393.22.16937-3)
引用
收藏
页码:331 / 340
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Safety and clinical efficacy of linezolid in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Shi, Yi
    Wu, Hai-Lan
    Wu, Yu-Hang
    Li, Shuang
    Zhang, Li-Ya
    Xu, Shan-Shan
    Huang, He-Yu
    Zhang, Chun-Hong
    Yu, Xu-Ben
    Cai, Kang
    Zhang, Jing
    Huang, Li-Su
    WORLD JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2023, 19 (02) : 129 - 138
  • [22] PREMEDICATION WITH MIDAZOLAM IN CHILDREN - EFFECT OF INTRANASAL, RECTAL AND ORAL ROUTES ON PLASMA MIDAZOLAM CONCENTRATIONS
    MALINOVSKY, JM
    POPULAIRE, C
    COZIAN, A
    LEPAGE, JY
    LEJUS, C
    PINAUD, M
    ANAESTHESIA, 1995, 50 (04) : 351 - 354
  • [23] Is dexmedetomidine superior to midazolam as a premedication in children? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Sun, Yu
    Lu, Yi
    Huang, Yan
    Jiang, Hong
    PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, 2014, 24 (08) : 863 - 874
  • [24] Comparison of Efficacy of Oral Clonidine and Oral Midazolam as Premedication in Children
    Vellut, G. Angel
    Palaramakrishnan, D.
    Anandan, Heber
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC STUDY, 2016, 4 (07) : 165 - 167
  • [25] Safety and Efficacy of Dexmedetomidine for Bronchoscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Guo, Qianqian
    An, Qi
    Zhao, Lin
    Wu, Meng
    Wang, Ye
    Guo, Zhenggang
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (04)
  • [26] Oral Dexmedetomidine Achieves Superior Effects in Mitigating Emergence Agitation and Demonstrates Comparable Sedative Effects to Oral Midazolam for Pediatric Premedication: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Studies
    Jen, Chun-Kai
    Lu, Kuo-Ching
    Chen, Kuan-Wen
    Lu, Yun-Ru
    Huang, I-Tao
    Huang, Yu-Chen
    Huang, Chun-Jen
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (04)
  • [27] Efficacy and safety of caspofungin in children: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Rosanova, Maria T.
    Bes, David
    Serrano Aguilar, Pedro
    Cuellar Pompa, Leticia
    Sberna, Norma
    Lede, Roberto
    ARCHIVOS ARGENTINOS DE PEDIATRIA, 2016, 114 (04): : 305 - 311
  • [28] Systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the efficacy of dexmedetomidine to midazolam as premedication and a sedative agent in pediatric patients undergoing dental procedures
    Taneja, Saumya
    Jain, Anuj
    ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY-HEIDELBERG, 2023, 27 (04): : 547 - 557
  • [29] Efficacy and safety of prophylactic intravenous dexmedetomidine on opioid-induced cough: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wu, Hongliang
    Hu, Weijiang
    Tan, Gang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2016, 9 (05): : 7655 - 7667
  • [30] Systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the efficacy of dexmedetomidine to midazolam as premedication and a sedative agent in pediatric patients undergoing dental procedures
    Saumya Taneja
    Anuj Jain
    Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2023, 27 : 547 - 557