Asymmetric effects of geopolitical risks and uncertainties on green bond markets

被引:95
作者
Tang, Yumei [1 ]
Chen, Xihui Haviour [2 ]
Sarker, Provash Kumer [3 ,4 ]
Baroudi, Sarra [2 ]
机构
[1] Chongqing Business Vocat Coll, Chongqing, Peoples R China
[2] Heriot Watt Univ, Res Ctr Social & Econ Data Analyt CSEDA, Edinburgh Business Sch, Edinburgh, Scotland
[3] Wuhan Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Wuhan, Hubei, Peoples R China
[4] Bangladesh Bank, Dhaka, Bangladesh
关键词
Economic policy uncertainty; Geopolitical threats; Geopolitical acts; WTI; Green bond; NARDL; INTERNATIONAL CRUDE-OIL; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; GRANGER-CAUSALITY; RENEWABLE ENERGY; POLICY UNCERTAINTY; YIELD SPREADS; PRICE SHOCKS; STOCK-PRICES; CLEAN ENERGY; CO-MOVEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122348
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper examines the asymmetric effects of the United States Economic Policy Uncertainty (USEPU), Geopolitical Threats (GPRT), Geopolitical Acts (GPRA), and the West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude oil on Green Bond returns. Our study analyses USEPU, GPRT, GPRA, WTI, and Green Bond monthly data from September 2012 to August 2022. By applying the Nonlinear Autoregressive Distributed Lags (NARDL) model, our empirical evidence shows that in the short run, the return on green bonds is negatively affected by an increase in USEPU and GPRA positively affected by an increase in GPRT and WTI. In the long run, the return on green bonds is negatively affected by an increase in USEPU, GPRA, and GPRT but positively affected by WTI. Considering the climate crisis, looking at these findings in the context of green bonds is essential to entice green investments. Policymakers should use our results for a policy design to mitigate green bond market volatility caused by external uncertainties and risks. Furthermore, we conclude that uncertainties should be considered when investing in green bonds and managing investment portfolios.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 101 条
[1]   The effects of macroeconomic, fiscal and monetary policy announcements on sovereign bond spreads [J].
Afonso, Antonio ;
Jalles, Joao Tovar ;
Kazemi, Mina .
INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF LAW AND ECONOMICS, 2020, 63
[2]  
Al-Thaqeb SA., 2019, The Journal of Economic Asymmetries, V20, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.JECA.2019.E00133
[3]   Geopolitical risks and the oil-stock nexus over 1899-2016 [J].
Antonakakis, Nikolaos ;
Gupta, Rangan ;
Kollias, Christos ;
Papadamou, Stephanos .
FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2017, 23 :165-173
[4]   Good volatility, bad volatility: What drives the asymmetric connectedness of Australian electricity markets? [J].
Apergis, Nicholas ;
Barunik, Jozef ;
Lau, Marco Chi Keung .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2017, 66 :108-115
[5]   Oil prices, stock markets and portfolio investment: Evidence from sector analysis in Europe over the last decade [J].
Arouri, Mohamed El Hedi ;
Nguyen, Duc Khuong .
ENERGY POLICY, 2010, 38 (08) :4528-4539
[6]  
Azhgaliyeva D., 2021, Policy support in promoting green bonds in Asia (no. 1275)
[7]   The Unprecedented Stock Market Reaction to COVID-19 [J].
Baker, Scott R. ;
Bloom, Nicholas ;
Davis, Steven J. ;
Kost, Kyle ;
Sammon, Marco ;
Viratyosin, Tasaneeya .
REVIEW OF ASSET PRICING STUDIES, 2020, 10 (04) :742-758
[8]   Measuring Economic Policy Uncertainty [J].
Baker, Scott R. ;
Bloom, Nicholas ;
Davis, Steven J. .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2016, 131 (04) :1593-1636
[9]   Geopolitical risks and stock market dynamics of the BRICS [J].
Balcilar, Mehmet ;
Bonato, Matteo ;
Demirer, Riza ;
Gupta, Rangan .
ECONOMIC SYSTEMS, 2018, 42 (02) :295-306
[10]  
Banerjee A., 1998, J TIME SER ANAL, V19, P267, DOI [10.1111/1467-9892.00091, DOI 10.1111/1467-9892.00091]