Revising the JBI quantitative critical appraisal tools to improve their applicability: an overview of methods and the development process

被引:120
作者
Barker, Timothy Hugh [1 ]
Stone, Jennifer C. [1 ]
Sears, Kim [2 ]
Klugar, Miloslav [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Leonardi-Bee, Jo [6 ]
Tufanaru, Catalin [1 ,7 ]
Aromataris, Edoardo [1 ]
Munn, Zachary [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Adelaide, Fac Hlth & Med Sci, JBI, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[2] Queens Univ, Queens Collaborat Hlth Care Qual, Kingston, ON, Canada
[3] Czech Natl Ctr Evidence Based Healthcare & Knowled, Brno, Czech Republic
[4] JBI Ctr Excellence, Czech Republ Middle European Ctr Evidence Based He, Brno, Czech Republic
[5] Masaryk Univ, Masaryk Univ GRADE Ctr, Inst Biostat & Anal, Fac Med, Brno, Czech Republic
[6] Univ Nottingham, Nottingham Ctr Evidence Based Healthcare, JBI Ctr Excellence, Sch Med, Nottingham, England
[7] Macquarie Univ, Australian Inst Hlth Innovat, Ctr Hlth Informat, Sydney, NSW, Australia
基金
澳大利亚国家健康与医学研究理事会;
关键词
critical appraisal instruments; methodological quality; risk of bias; systematic review methodology; EXTERNAL VALIDITY; BIAS; QUALITY; SELECTION; TRIALS; RISK;
D O I
10.11124/JBIES-22-00125
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
JBI offers a suite of critical appraisal instruments that are freely available to systematic reviewers and researchers investigating the methodological limitations of primary research studies. The JBI instruments are designed to be study-specific and are presented as questions in a checklist. The JBI instruments have existed in a checklist-style format for approximately 20 years; however, as the field of research synthesis expands, many of the tools offered by JBI have become outdated. The JBI critical appraisal tools for quantitative studies (eg, randomized controlled trials, quasi-experimental studies) must be updated to reflect the current methodologies in this field. Cognizant of this and the recent developments in risk-of-bias science, the JBI Effectiveness Methodology Group was tasked with updating the current quantitative critical appraisal instruments. This paper details the methods and rationale that the JBI Effectiveness Methodology Group followed when updating the JBI critical appraisal instruments for quantitative study designs. We detail the key changes made to the tools and highlight how these changes reflect current methodological developments in this field.
引用
收藏
页码:478 / 493
页数:16
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] Aromataris E, 2020, JBI MANUAL EVIDENCE, DOI [10.46658/JBIMES-20-01, 10.46658/JBIMES-20-11, DOI 10.46658/JBIMES-20-01]
  • [2] The risk of bias in observational studies of exposures (ROBINS-E) tool: concerns arising from application to observational studies of exposures
    Bero, Lisa
    Chartres, Nicholas
    Diong, Joanna
    Fabbri, Alice
    Ghersi, Davina
    Lam, Juleen
    Lau, Agnes
    McDonald, Sally
    Mintzes, Barbara
    Sutton, Patrice
    Turton, Jessica Louise
    Woodruff, Tracey J.
    [J]. SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2018, 7
  • [3] Cook TD., 1979, Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings
  • [4] The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions
    Downs, SH
    Black, N
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 1998, 52 (06) : 377 - 384
  • [5] External validity, generalizability, and knowledge utilization
    Ferguson, L
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NURSING SCHOLARSHIP, 2004, 36 (01) : 16 - 22
  • [6] Statistical conclusion validity: some common threats and simple remedies
    Garcia-Perez, Miguel A.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 3
  • [7] Group G.W., 2004, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V328, P1490, DOI DOI 10.1136/BMJ.328.7454.1490
  • [8] Higgins JPT, COCHRANE HDB SYSTEMA
  • [9] Higgins JPT, 2021, COCHRANE HDB SYSTEMA
  • [10] The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials
    Higgins, Julian P. T.
    Altman, Douglas G.
    Gotzsche, Peter C.
    Jueni, Peter
    Moher, David
    Oxman, Andrew D.
    Savovic, Jelena
    Schulz, Kenneth F.
    Weeks, Laura
    Sterne, Jonathan A. C.
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2011, 343