Optimization of landscape pattern in China Luojiang Xiaoxi basin based on landscape ecological risk assessment

被引:46
|
作者
Li, Shaokun [1 ]
He, Wenxi [1 ]
Wang, Lei [1 ]
Zhang, Zhi [3 ]
Chen, Xiaoqian [4 ]
Lei, Tianci [1 ]
Wang, Shaojun [2 ]
Wang, Zhuangzhuang [3 ]
机构
[1] China Geol Survey, Wuhan Ctr, Wuhan 430205, Peoples R China
[2] China Univ Geosci, Res Ctr Spatial Planning & Human Environm Syst Sim, Sch Geog & Informat Engn, Wuhan 430074, Peoples R China
[3] China Univ Geosci, Inst Geophys & Geomat, Wuhan 430074, Peoples R China
[4] Changjiang Space Informat Technol Engn Co Ltd, Wuhan 430010, Peoples R China
关键词
Landscape ecological risk assessment; Landscape pattern optimization; Spatial principal component analysis; Minimum cumulative resistance model; Luojiang Xiaoxi Basin;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.109887
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Multi-source ecological risks have induced many ecological pollution problems that cannot be ignored and seriously threaten regional ecological security. Constructing and optimizing the landscape pattern is beneficial to improve watershed ecosystem services. In this study, an innovative method is proposed to construct and optimize the landscape pattern, which takes Luojiang-Small Creek watershed as an example. 10-meter high-precision raster elements are selected as the basic unit for landscape ecological risk evaluation, and 20 evaluation factors are selected from three dimensions of "natural environment-human society-landscape pattern" to establish the evaluation index system. The spatial principal component-redundancy analysis (SPCA-RDA) was used to comprehensively evaluate the landscape ecological risk in 2019, and the minimum cumulative resistance model (MCR) and gravity model were used to optimize the landscape pattern of the watershed. The results show (1) Human social and landscape pattern factors have a more significant influence on the integrated ecological risk, while natural factors, except for soil type and vegetation cover, have a weaker influence on the integrated ecological risk. (2) The overall landscape ecological risk is low, and the area of the mild landscape ecological risk zone is 259.89 km2, accounting for 81.68 % of the study area. According to the MCR model and gravity model, forest land with an area larger than 1 km2 and water bodies and grassland with an area larger than 0.01 km2 were identified as ecological source sites. (3) 17 potential ecological corridors were constructed, including 4 road-type corridors, 9 green belt-type corridors and 4 river-type corridors, with a total length of 68.72 km, and 22 potential ecological nodes were identified, including 8 A-type ecological nodes and 14 B-type ecological nodes. A comprehensive three-dimensional spatial ecological network of "ecological nodes-ecological corridors-ecological zones" was constructed, and the optimization effect of the landscape pattern in the study area was evaluated, and it was found that the optimized landscape pattern had significantly improved in terms of connectivity. The results of the study provide ecological protection and planning guidance for future risk prevention and control and landscape pattern optimization of the area with watershed as a unit.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Optimization of landscape ecological risk assessment method and ecological management zoning considering resilience
    Wang, Jin
    Wang, Jinman
    Zhang, Jianing
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2025, 376
  • [42] Spatiotemporal pattern of landscape ecological risk in the Yangtze River Basin and its influence on NPP
    Jia, Lu
    Yu, Kunxia
    Li, Zhanbin
    Li, Peng
    Cong, Peijuan
    Li, Binbin
    FRONTIERS IN FORESTS AND GLOBAL CHANGE, 2024, 6
  • [43] Prediction of ecological security network in Northeast China based on landscape ecological risk
    Sui, Lu
    Yan, Zhiming
    Li, Kaifang
    Wang, Chengwu
    Shi, Yan
    Du, Yongjun
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2024, 160
  • [44] Changes in Landscape Pattern and an Ecological Risk Assessment of the Changshagongma Wetland Nature Reserve
    Yang, Cai
    Deng, Wei
    Yuan, Quanzhi
    Zhang, Shaoyao
    FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2022, 10
  • [45] Risk assessment of sandstorm diffusion and landscape pattern optimization in southern Xinjiang
    Shi N.
    Han Y.
    Wang Q.
    Han R.
    Gao X.
    Zhao Z.
    Liu G.
    Xiao N.
    Dili Xuebao/Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76 (01): : 73 - 86
  • [46] Landscape Ecological Risk Assessment of the Chaohu Lake Region Based on Dynamic Evolution of Landscape Patterns
    Wang, Mimi
    Niu, Zhenyong
    Zhong, Zixun
    Li, Jiahao
    Liu, Haiyang
    POLISH JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES, 2024, 33 (03): : 2831 - 2846
  • [47] Review of landscape ecological risk and an assessment framework based on ecological services: ESRISK
    Cao Q.
    Zhang X.
    Ma H.
    Wu J.
    Wu, Jiansheng (wujs@pkusz.edu.cn), 2018, Science Press (73): : 843 - 855
  • [48] Landscape Ecological Risk Assessment Based on LUCC-A Case Study of Chaoyang County, China
    Ji, Yuxin
    Bai, Zhongke
    Hui, Jiawei
    FORESTS, 2021, 12 (09):
  • [49] Landscape ecological risk assessment of farming-pastoral ecotone in China based on terrain gradients
    Yan, Jixuan
    Li, Guang
    Qi, Guangping
    Qiao, Hongqiang
    Nie, Zhigang
    Huang, Caixia
    Kang, Yanxia
    Sun, Dongyuan
    Zhang, Meihua
    Kang, Xia
    Yao, Xiangdong
    HUMAN AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT, 2021, 27 (08): : 2124 - 2141
  • [50] Construction of a landscape ecological network based on landscape ecological risk assessment: A case study of the resource-based city of Linfen
    Zhao J.
    Yu Q.
    Xu C.
    Ma J.
    Meitan Xuebao/Journal of the China Coal Society, 2024, 49 (06): : 2811 - 2825