How does heterogeneous environmental regulation affect net carbon emissions: Spatial and threshold analysis for China

被引:90
作者
Huang, Xiaoling [1 ]
Tian, Peng [1 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Geosci Wuhan, Sch Econ & Management, Wuhan 430074, Peoples R China
关键词
Environmental regulation; Carbon emissions; Carbon sinks; Spatial Durbin model; Threshold model; TECHNOLOGICAL-INNOVATION; EMPIRICAL-ANALYSIS; CLIMATE POLICY; GREEN PARADOX; AIR-POLLUTION; LEVEL; URBANIZATION; IMPACTS; GROWTH; ENERGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.117161
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The Chinese government has made great efforts in air pollutant reduction and carried out strict regulation policies. Since numerous air pollutants and CO2 tend to have the same root, source, and process, recent studies argue that environmental regulation may also contribute to reducing carbon emissions. To investigate how various types of environmental regulations affect carbon emissions reduction, this paper constructs the spatial Durbin model and panel threshold model based on provincial panel data in China during 2003-2019. The main findings are as follows: First, China's net carbon emissions show a decreasing trend from east to west, displaying significant spatial agglomeration characteristics. Then, formal and informal environmental regulations have inverted U-shaped impacts on net carbon emissions. The "green paradox" and "reverse emission reduction" effects come into play at different stages. Finally, the threshold model reveals that with the improvement of regional technological innovation levels, the carbon-reducing effect of environmental regulation will increasingly come to the fore. These research findings are conducive to providing theoretical guidance for government to formulate and implement environmental regulation policies rationally.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 82 条
[51]   Application of threshold regression analysis to study the impact of regional technological innovation level on sustainable development [J].
Su Yi ;
An Xiao-li .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2018, 89 :27-32
[52]  
Sun H., 2015, ECON GEOGR, V35, P154, DOI DOI 10.15957/J.CNKI.JJDL.2015.03.023
[53]   What are the roles of green technology innovation and ICT employment in lowering carbon intensity in China? A city-level analysis of the spatial effects [J].
Sun, Hongye .
RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2022, 186
[54]   The internal-structural effects of different types of environmental regulations on China's green total-factor productivity [J].
Tian, Ying ;
Feng, Chao .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2022, 113
[55]   Can a carbon trading system promote the transformation of a low-carbon economy under the framework of the porter hypothesis? -Empirical analysis based on the PSM-DID method [J].
Wang, Han ;
Chen, Zhoupeng ;
Wu, Xingyi ;
Niea, Xin .
ENERGY POLICY, 2019, 129 :930-938
[56]   Effects of environmental regulation on CO2 emissions: An empirical analysis of 282 cities in China [J].
Wang, Huiping ;
Zhang, Runjie .
SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION, 2022, 29 :259-272
[57]   Research on the impact mechanism of heterogeneous environmental regulation on enterprise green technology innovation [J].
Wang, Liping ;
Long, Ying ;
Li, Chuang .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2022, 322
[58]   Can China's carbon trading policy help achieve Carbon Neutrality?-A study of policy effects from the Five-sphere Integrated Plan perspective [J].
Wang, Xiaoxia ;
Huang, Jialiang ;
Liu, Hongda .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2022, 305
[59]   Spatial correlation of factors affecting CO2 emission at provincial level in China: A geographically weighted regression approach [J].
Wang, Yanan ;
Chen, Wei ;
Kang, Yanqing ;
Li, Wei ;
Guo, Fang .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 184 :929-937
[60]   Research on energy conservation and carbon emission reduction effects and mechanism: Quasi-experimental evidence from China [J].
Wen, Shibin ;
Liu, Hongman .
ENERGY POLICY, 2022, 169