Laparoscopic versus open in right posterior sectionectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Ding, Zigang [1 ]
Fang, Hongcai [1 ]
Huang, Mingwen [2 ]
Yu, Tao [1 ]
机构
[1] Jiujiang Univ, Dept Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg, Affiliated Hosp, 57 Xunyang East Rd, Jiujiang 332000, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
[2] Nanchang Univ, Dept Gen Surg, Affiliated Hosp 2, Nanchang 330006, Peoples R China
关键词
Laparoscopic; Hepatectomy; Right posterior sectionectomy; Meta-analysis; LEFT LATERAL SECTIONECTOMY; HEPATOCELLULAR-CARCINOMA; LIVER RESECTION; CIRRHOTIC-PATIENTS; OPEN HEPATECTOMY; TUMORS; SEGMENTS; FEASIBILITY; OUTCOMES; BENIGN;
D O I
10.1007/s00423-023-02764-0
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundLaparoscopic liver resection (LLR) is now widely adopted for the treatment of liver tumors due to its minimally invasive advantages. However, multicenter, large-sample population-based laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy (LRPS) has rarely been reported. We aimed to assess the advantages and drawbacks of right posterior sectionectomy compared with laparoscopic and open surgery by meta-analysis.MethodsRelevant literature was searched using the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Ovid Medline, and Web of Science databases up to September 12, 2021. Quality assessment was performed based on a modified version of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). The data were analyzed by Review Manager 5.3. The data were calculated by odds ratio (OR) or mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for fixed-effects and random-effects models.ResultsThe meta-analysis included seven studies involving 739 patients. Compared with open right posterior sectionectomy (ORPS), the LRPS group had lower intraoperative blood loss (MD - 135.45; 95%CI - 170.61 to - 100.30; P < 0.00001) and shorter postoperative hospital stays (MD - 2.17; 95% CI - 3.03 to - 1.31; P < 0.00001). However, there were no statistically significant differences between LRPS and ORPS regarding operative time (MD 44.97; P = 0.11), pedicle clamping (OR 0.65; P = 0.44), clamping time (MD 2.72; P = 0.31), transfusion rate (OR 1.95; P = 0.25), tumor size (MD - 0.16; P = 0.13), resection margin (MD 0.08; P = 0.63), R0 resection (OR 1.49; P = 0.35), recurrence rate (OR 2.06; P = 0.20), 5-year overall survival (OR 1.44; P = 0.45), and 5-year disease-free survival (OR 1.07; P = 0.88). Furthermore, no significant difference was observed in terms of postoperative complications (P = 0.08), bile leakage (P = 0.60), ascites (P = 0.08), incisional infection (P = 0.09), postoperative bleeding (P = 0.56), and pleural effusion (P = 0.77).ConclusionsLRPS has an advantage in the length of hospital stay and blood loss. LRPS is a very useful technology and feasible choice in patients with the right posterior hepatic lobe tumor.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Laparoscopic Versus Open Pancreatoduodenectomy in Patients With Periampullary Tumors A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Sattari, Shahab Aldin
    Sattari, Ali Reza
    Makary, Martin A.
    Hu, Chen
    He, Jin
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2023, 277 (05) : 742 - 755
  • [42] Laparoscopic Versus Open Pancreatoduodenectomy for Periampullary Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Reis, Pedro C. A.
    Bittar, Vinicius
    Almiron, Giulia
    Schramm, Ana Julia
    Oliveira, Joao Pedro
    Cagnacci, Renato
    Camandaroba, Marcos P. G.
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL CANCER, 2024, 55 (03) : 1058 - 1068
  • [43] Laparoscopic versus open pyloromyotomy in infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Sathya, Chethan
    Wayne, Carolyn
    Gotsch, Anna
    Vincent, Jennifer
    Sullivan, Katrina J.
    Nasr, Ahmed
    PEDIATRIC SURGERY INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 33 (03) : 325 - 333
  • [44] Robotic versus laparoscopic right colectomy for colon cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zheng, Jian-Chun
    Zhao, Shuai
    Chen, Wei
    Wu, Jian-Xiang
    VIDEOSURGERY AND OTHER MINIINVASIVE TECHNIQUES, 2023, 18 (01) : 20 - 30
  • [45] Laparoscopic hepatectomy versus open hepatectomy in the management of posterosuperior segments of the Liver: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yin, Zi
    Jin, Haosheng
    Ma, Tingting
    Wang, Hongxu
    Huang, Bowen
    Jian, Zhixiang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2018, 60 : 101 - 110
  • [46] Open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis. Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Coccolini, Federico
    Catena, Fausto
    Pisano, Michele
    Gheza, Federico
    Fagiuoli, Stefano
    Di Saverio, Salomone
    Leandro, Gioacchino
    Montori, Giulia
    Ceresoli, Marco
    Corbella, Davide
    Sartelli, Massimo
    Sugrue, Michael
    Ansaloni, Luca
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2015, 18 : 196 - 204
  • [47] Meta-Analysis of Laparoscopic Versus Open Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Zhou, Yan-Ming
    Shao, Wen-Yu
    Zhao, Yan-Fang
    Xu, Dong-Hui
    Li, Bin
    DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 2011, 56 (07) : 1937 - 1943
  • [48] Laparoscopic versus robotic major hepatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ziogas, Ioannis A.
    Giannis, Dimitrios
    Esagian, Stepan M.
    Economopoulos, Konstantinos P.
    Tohme, Samer
    Geller, David A.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2021, 35 (02): : 524 - 535
  • [49] Laparoscopic liver resection in elderly patients: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Notarnicola, Margherita
    Felli, Emanuele
    Roselli, Stefania
    Altomare, Donato Francesco
    De Fazio, Michele
    de'Angelis, Nicola
    Piardi, Tullio
    Acquafredda, Silvana
    Ammendola, Michele
    Verbo, Alessandro
    Pessaux, Patrick
    Memeo, Riccardo
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2019, 33 (09): : 2763 - 2773
  • [50] Laparoscopic Versus Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Nickel, Felix
    Haney, Caelan Max
    Kowalewski, Karl Friedrich
    Probst, Pascal
    Limen, Eldridge Frederick
    Kalkum, Eva
    Diener, Marcus K.
    Strobel, Oliver
    Mueller-Stich, Beat Peter
    Hackert, Thilo
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2020, 271 (01) : 54 - 66