Laparoscopic versus open in right posterior sectionectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Ding, Zigang [1 ]
Fang, Hongcai [1 ]
Huang, Mingwen [2 ]
Yu, Tao [1 ]
机构
[1] Jiujiang Univ, Dept Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg, Affiliated Hosp, 57 Xunyang East Rd, Jiujiang 332000, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
[2] Nanchang Univ, Dept Gen Surg, Affiliated Hosp 2, Nanchang 330006, Peoples R China
关键词
Laparoscopic; Hepatectomy; Right posterior sectionectomy; Meta-analysis; LEFT LATERAL SECTIONECTOMY; HEPATOCELLULAR-CARCINOMA; LIVER RESECTION; CIRRHOTIC-PATIENTS; OPEN HEPATECTOMY; TUMORS; SEGMENTS; FEASIBILITY; OUTCOMES; BENIGN;
D O I
10.1007/s00423-023-02764-0
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundLaparoscopic liver resection (LLR) is now widely adopted for the treatment of liver tumors due to its minimally invasive advantages. However, multicenter, large-sample population-based laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy (LRPS) has rarely been reported. We aimed to assess the advantages and drawbacks of right posterior sectionectomy compared with laparoscopic and open surgery by meta-analysis.MethodsRelevant literature was searched using the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Ovid Medline, and Web of Science databases up to September 12, 2021. Quality assessment was performed based on a modified version of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). The data were analyzed by Review Manager 5.3. The data were calculated by odds ratio (OR) or mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for fixed-effects and random-effects models.ResultsThe meta-analysis included seven studies involving 739 patients. Compared with open right posterior sectionectomy (ORPS), the LRPS group had lower intraoperative blood loss (MD - 135.45; 95%CI - 170.61 to - 100.30; P < 0.00001) and shorter postoperative hospital stays (MD - 2.17; 95% CI - 3.03 to - 1.31; P < 0.00001). However, there were no statistically significant differences between LRPS and ORPS regarding operative time (MD 44.97; P = 0.11), pedicle clamping (OR 0.65; P = 0.44), clamping time (MD 2.72; P = 0.31), transfusion rate (OR 1.95; P = 0.25), tumor size (MD - 0.16; P = 0.13), resection margin (MD 0.08; P = 0.63), R0 resection (OR 1.49; P = 0.35), recurrence rate (OR 2.06; P = 0.20), 5-year overall survival (OR 1.44; P = 0.45), and 5-year disease-free survival (OR 1.07; P = 0.88). Furthermore, no significant difference was observed in terms of postoperative complications (P = 0.08), bile leakage (P = 0.60), ascites (P = 0.08), incisional infection (P = 0.09), postoperative bleeding (P = 0.56), and pleural effusion (P = 0.77).ConclusionsLRPS has an advantage in the length of hospital stay and blood loss. LRPS is a very useful technology and feasible choice in patients with the right posterior hepatic lobe tumor.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Laparoscopic Versus Open Right Posterior Sectionectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in a High-Volume Center: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis
    Rhu, Jinsoo
    Kim, Sung Joo
    Choi, Gyu Seong
    Kim, Jong Man
    Joh, Jae-Won
    Kwon, Choon Hyuck David
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2018, 42 (09) : 2930 - 2937
  • [32] Laparoscopic versus open pyloromyotomy in infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chethan Sathya
    Carolyn Wayne
    Anna Gotsch
    Jennifer Vincent
    Katrina J. Sullivan
    Ahmed Nasr
    Pediatric Surgery International, 2017, 33 : 325 - 333
  • [33] Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy in pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Negin Sedaghat
    Amy M. Cao
    Guy D. Eslick
    Michael R. Cox
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2017, 31 : 673 - 679
  • [34] Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Laparoscopic Versus Open Distal Gastrectomy
    Qiuye Cheng
    Tony C. Y. Pang
    Michael J. Hollands
    Arthur J. Richardson
    Henry Pleass
    Emma S. Johnston
    Vincent W. T. Lam
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2014, 18 : 1087 - 1099
  • [35] Laparoscopic versus open major liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative cohort studies
    Wang, Zi-Yu
    Chen, Qing-Lian
    Sun, Ling-Ling
    He, Shu-Ping
    Luo, Xiao-Fen
    Huang, Li-Shuang
    Huang, Jun-Hai
    Xiong, Cheng-Ming
    Zhong, Chong
    BMC CANCER, 2019, 19 (01)
  • [36] Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy in pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Sedaghat, Negin
    Cao, Amy M.
    Eslick, Guy D.
    Cox, Michael R.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2017, 31 (02): : 673 - 679
  • [37] A comparison between robotic, laparoscopic and open hepatectomy: A systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Gavriilidis, Paschalis
    Roberts, Keith J.
    Aldrighetti, Luca
    Sutcliffe, Robert P.
    EJSO, 2020, 46 (07): : 1214 - 1224
  • [38] Laparoscopic versus open complete mesocolic excision: a systematic review by updated meta-analysis
    Gavriilidis, Paschalis
    Davies, R. Justin
    Biondi, Antonio
    Wheeler, James
    Testini, Mario
    Carcano, Giulio
    Di Saverio, Salomone
    UPDATES IN SURGERY, 2020, 72 (03) : 639 - 648
  • [39] Safety and feasibility for laparoscopic versus open caudate lobe resection: a meta-analysis
    Ding, Zigang
    Liu, Lingpeng
    Xu, Bangran
    Huang, Yong
    Xiong, Hu
    Luo, Dilai
    Huang, Mingwen
    LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2021, 406 (05) : 1307 - 1316
  • [40] A meta-analysis: laparoscopic versus open liver resection for large hepatocellular carcinoma
    Peng, Zha
    Zhu, Zhuang-Rong
    He, Cheng-Yi
    Huang, Hai
    MINIMALLY INVASIVE THERAPY & ALLIED TECHNOLOGIES, 2025, 34 (01) : 24 - 34