Laparoscopic versus open in right posterior sectionectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Ding, Zigang [1 ]
Fang, Hongcai [1 ]
Huang, Mingwen [2 ]
Yu, Tao [1 ]
机构
[1] Jiujiang Univ, Dept Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg, Affiliated Hosp, 57 Xunyang East Rd, Jiujiang 332000, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
[2] Nanchang Univ, Dept Gen Surg, Affiliated Hosp 2, Nanchang 330006, Peoples R China
关键词
Laparoscopic; Hepatectomy; Right posterior sectionectomy; Meta-analysis; LEFT LATERAL SECTIONECTOMY; HEPATOCELLULAR-CARCINOMA; LIVER RESECTION; CIRRHOTIC-PATIENTS; OPEN HEPATECTOMY; TUMORS; SEGMENTS; FEASIBILITY; OUTCOMES; BENIGN;
D O I
10.1007/s00423-023-02764-0
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundLaparoscopic liver resection (LLR) is now widely adopted for the treatment of liver tumors due to its minimally invasive advantages. However, multicenter, large-sample population-based laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy (LRPS) has rarely been reported. We aimed to assess the advantages and drawbacks of right posterior sectionectomy compared with laparoscopic and open surgery by meta-analysis.MethodsRelevant literature was searched using the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Ovid Medline, and Web of Science databases up to September 12, 2021. Quality assessment was performed based on a modified version of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). The data were analyzed by Review Manager 5.3. The data were calculated by odds ratio (OR) or mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for fixed-effects and random-effects models.ResultsThe meta-analysis included seven studies involving 739 patients. Compared with open right posterior sectionectomy (ORPS), the LRPS group had lower intraoperative blood loss (MD - 135.45; 95%CI - 170.61 to - 100.30; P < 0.00001) and shorter postoperative hospital stays (MD - 2.17; 95% CI - 3.03 to - 1.31; P < 0.00001). However, there were no statistically significant differences between LRPS and ORPS regarding operative time (MD 44.97; P = 0.11), pedicle clamping (OR 0.65; P = 0.44), clamping time (MD 2.72; P = 0.31), transfusion rate (OR 1.95; P = 0.25), tumor size (MD - 0.16; P = 0.13), resection margin (MD 0.08; P = 0.63), R0 resection (OR 1.49; P = 0.35), recurrence rate (OR 2.06; P = 0.20), 5-year overall survival (OR 1.44; P = 0.45), and 5-year disease-free survival (OR 1.07; P = 0.88). Furthermore, no significant difference was observed in terms of postoperative complications (P = 0.08), bile leakage (P = 0.60), ascites (P = 0.08), incisional infection (P = 0.09), postoperative bleeding (P = 0.56), and pleural effusion (P = 0.77).ConclusionsLRPS has an advantage in the length of hospital stay and blood loss. LRPS is a very useful technology and feasible choice in patients with the right posterior hepatic lobe tumor.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Laparoscopic VS open hepatectomy for hepatolithiasis: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis
    Li, Hui
    Zheng, Jun
    Cai, Jian-Ye
    Li, Shi-Hui
    Zhang, Jun-Bin
    Wang, Xiao-Ming
    Chen, Gui-Hua
    Yang, Yang
    Wang, Gen-Shu
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2017, 23 (43) : 7791 - 7806
  • [22] Outcomes of laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma in the era of laparoscopic surgery
    Cho, Jai Young
    Han, Ho-Seong
    Yoon, Yoo-Seok
    Choi, YoungRok
    Lee, Woohyung
    SURGERY, 2015, 158 (01) : 135 - 141
  • [23] Laparoscopic versus open colectomy for obstructing right colon cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Cirocchi, R.
    Campanile, F. Cesare
    Di Saverio, S.
    Popivanov, G.
    Carlini, L.
    Pironi, D.
    Tabola, R.
    Vettoretto, N.
    JOURNAL OF VISCERAL SURGERY, 2017, 154 (06) : 387 - 399
  • [24] Assessment of laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Lyu, Yunxiao
    Cheng, Yunxiao
    Wang, Bin
    Zhao, Sicong
    Chen, Liang
    MINIMALLY INVASIVE THERAPY & ALLIED TECHNOLOGIES, 2022, 31 (03) : 350 - 358
  • [25] Laparoscopic versus open treatment of gallbladder cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhao, Xin
    Li, Xiang Yang
    Ji, Wu
    JOURNAL OF MINIMAL ACCESS SURGERY, 2018, 14 (03) : 185 - 191
  • [26] Laparoscopic Versus Open Major Hepatectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis
    Chen, Ke
    Pan, Yu
    Hu, Geng-yuan
    Maher, Hendi
    Zheng, Xue-yong
    Yan, Jia-fei
    SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES, 2018, 28 (05) : 267 - 274
  • [27] Laparoscopic Versus Open Liver Resection for Difficult Lesions: A Meta-Analysis
    Liu, Fei
    Li, Qin
    Wei, Yonggang
    Li, Bo
    JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2018, 28 (12): : 1428 - 1436
  • [28] Laparoscopic Versus Open Liver Resection for Tumors in the Posterosuperior Segments: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Hajibandeh, Shahab
    Hajibandeh, Shahin
    Dave, Madhav
    Tarazi, Munir
    Satyadas, Thomas
    SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES, 2020, 30 (02) : 93 - 105
  • [29] Systematic review and meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open repeat hepatectomy for recurrent liver cancer
    Peng, Long
    Zhou, Zhiyong
    Xiao, Weidong
    Hu, Xiaoyun
    Cao, Jiaqing
    Mao, Shengxun
    SURGICAL ONCOLOGY-OXFORD, 2019, 28 : 19 - 30
  • [30] Laparoscopic or open liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A meta-analysis and systematic review
    Zhao, Xin
    Gao, Feng-wei
    Jiang, Kang-yi
    Yang, Jie
    Xie, Qing-yun
    Gong, Jie
    Yang, Man-yu
    Mao, Tian-yang
    Lei, Ze-hua
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2023, 13