Laparoscopic versus open in right posterior sectionectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Ding, Zigang [1 ]
Fang, Hongcai [1 ]
Huang, Mingwen [2 ]
Yu, Tao [1 ]
机构
[1] Jiujiang Univ, Dept Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg, Affiliated Hosp, 57 Xunyang East Rd, Jiujiang 332000, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
[2] Nanchang Univ, Dept Gen Surg, Affiliated Hosp 2, Nanchang 330006, Peoples R China
关键词
Laparoscopic; Hepatectomy; Right posterior sectionectomy; Meta-analysis; LEFT LATERAL SECTIONECTOMY; HEPATOCELLULAR-CARCINOMA; LIVER RESECTION; CIRRHOTIC-PATIENTS; OPEN HEPATECTOMY; TUMORS; SEGMENTS; FEASIBILITY; OUTCOMES; BENIGN;
D O I
10.1007/s00423-023-02764-0
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundLaparoscopic liver resection (LLR) is now widely adopted for the treatment of liver tumors due to its minimally invasive advantages. However, multicenter, large-sample population-based laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy (LRPS) has rarely been reported. We aimed to assess the advantages and drawbacks of right posterior sectionectomy compared with laparoscopic and open surgery by meta-analysis.MethodsRelevant literature was searched using the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Ovid Medline, and Web of Science databases up to September 12, 2021. Quality assessment was performed based on a modified version of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). The data were analyzed by Review Manager 5.3. The data were calculated by odds ratio (OR) or mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for fixed-effects and random-effects models.ResultsThe meta-analysis included seven studies involving 739 patients. Compared with open right posterior sectionectomy (ORPS), the LRPS group had lower intraoperative blood loss (MD - 135.45; 95%CI - 170.61 to - 100.30; P < 0.00001) and shorter postoperative hospital stays (MD - 2.17; 95% CI - 3.03 to - 1.31; P < 0.00001). However, there were no statistically significant differences between LRPS and ORPS regarding operative time (MD 44.97; P = 0.11), pedicle clamping (OR 0.65; P = 0.44), clamping time (MD 2.72; P = 0.31), transfusion rate (OR 1.95; P = 0.25), tumor size (MD - 0.16; P = 0.13), resection margin (MD 0.08; P = 0.63), R0 resection (OR 1.49; P = 0.35), recurrence rate (OR 2.06; P = 0.20), 5-year overall survival (OR 1.44; P = 0.45), and 5-year disease-free survival (OR 1.07; P = 0.88). Furthermore, no significant difference was observed in terms of postoperative complications (P = 0.08), bile leakage (P = 0.60), ascites (P = 0.08), incisional infection (P = 0.09), postoperative bleeding (P = 0.56), and pleural effusion (P = 0.77).ConclusionsLRPS has an advantage in the length of hospital stay and blood loss. LRPS is a very useful technology and feasible choice in patients with the right posterior hepatic lobe tumor.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Laparoscopic versus open in right posterior sectionectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zigang Ding
    Hongcai Fang
    Mingwen Huang
    Tao Yu
    Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, 408
  • [2] The safety and feasibility of laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy vs. open approach: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wang, Meng-Xiao
    Xiang, Ji-Feng
    Chen, Sheng-Kai
    Xiao, Lin-Kang
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2022, 9
  • [3] Laparoscopic versus open liver resections of posterolateral liver segments - a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Rubinkiewicz, Mateusz
    Mizera, Magdalena
    Malczak, Piotr
    Gajewska, Natalia
    Torbicz, Grzegorz
    Su, Michael
    Karcz, Konrad
    Pedziwiatr, Michal
    VIDEOSURGERY AND OTHER MINIINVASIVE TECHNIQUES, 2020, 15 (03) : 395 - 402
  • [4] Laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy versus laparoscopic right hemihepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma in posterior segments: Propensity Score Matching Analysis
    Rhu, J.
    Choi, G. S.
    Kim, J. M.
    Kwon, C. H. D.
    Kim, S. J.
    Joh, J. -W.
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2019, 108 (01) : 23 - 29
  • [5] A meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open left lateral hepatic sectionectomy
    Zacharoulis, Dimitrios
    Tasiopoulou, Vasiliki S.
    Svokos, Konstantina A.
    Svokos, Alexis A.
    Christodoulidis, Gregory
    Mamaloudis, Ioannis
    Sioka, Eleni
    Magouliotis, Dimitrios E.
    HPB, 2018, 20 (12) : 1130 - 1136
  • [6] Robotic versus laparoscopic hepatectomy for malignancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hu, Yingnan
    Guo, Kaibo
    Xu, Jingming
    Xia, Taotao
    Wang, Tingting
    Liu, Nan
    Fu, Yongqing
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 44 (04) : 615 - 628
  • [7] Laparoscopic versus open Nissen fundoplication in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ru, Wei
    Wu, Peng
    Feng, Shaoguang
    Lai, Xin-He
    Chen, Guorong
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 2016, 51 (10) : 1731 - 1736
  • [8] Economic analysis of open versus laparoscopic versus robotic hepatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ziogas, Ioannis A.
    Evangeliou, Alexandros P.
    Mylonas, Konstantinos S.
    Athanasiadis, Dimitrios I.
    Cherouveim, Panagiotis
    Geller, David A.
    Schulick, Richard D.
    Alexopoulos, Sophoclis P.
    Tsoulfas, Georgios
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2021, 22 (04) : 585 - 604
  • [9] Laparoscopic versus Robotic Hepatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Aboudou, Taslim
    Li, Meixuan
    Zhang, Zeliang
    Wang, Zhengfeng
    Li, Yanfei
    Feng, Lufang
    Chu, Xiajing
    Chen, Nan
    Zhou, Wence
    Yang, Kehu
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (19)
  • [10] Robotic Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Liver Resections: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Kamarajah, S. K., V
    Bundred, J.
    Manas, D.
    Jiao, L. R.
    Hilal, M. A.
    White, S. A.
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 110 (03) : 290 - 300