Investigating EFL writers? critical thinking performance across languages

被引:1
|
作者
Dong, Yanning [1 ,3 ]
Chang, Xiaoling [2 ]
机构
[1] Tsinghua Univ, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Foreign Studies Univ, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Tsinghua Univ, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
关键词
Critical thinking; Assessment; L1; writing; L2; EFL students; STUDENTS; SKILLS;
D O I
10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101232
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Understanding how writing in different languages affects one's critical thinking (CT) performance is of high importance for both the teaching and assessment of CT. Previous research has identified a close connection between CT and writing as well as the effectiveness of evaluating CT through the proxy of writing (e.g., Bean, 2011; Dong, 2017, 2018; Rahmat, 2020); however, little is known about whether and how one's CT performance varies when writing in different languages. This mixed-methods study was designed to fill this gap by comparing 31 Chinese English-as-a-Foreign-Language (EFL) students' CT scores, determined through evaluation of their essays written in English and Chinese. The results showed that the participants demonstrated significantly better CT abilities when they wrote in their L1 (t = 8.105, p < 0.01); however, there was no significant correlation between students' L1 CT and L2 CT scores. In addition, the study identified a number of factors that significantly influenced students' decision-making in their L1 and L2 writing processes and affected their CT performance in aspects such as clarity, precision, breadth, depth, and relevance. This study contributes to a dynamic conceptualization of EFL writers' CT performance across languages and highlights the need to recognize the differences between multilingual students' CT abilities and CT performance. The study also provides practical implications for the teaching and assessment of CT in multilingual contexts.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] EFL LEARNERS' ATTITUDES TOWARDS CRITICAL THINKING INSTRUCTION
    Movafagh, Shabnam Azarmi
    Tahriri, Abdorreza
    MODERN JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE TEACHING METHODS, 2014, 4 (03): : 45 - 53
  • [22] Critical Thinking Ability and EFL Students' Grammar Knowledge
    Ebrahimpourtaher, Adel
    Eisaie, Saide
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON LANGUAGE, LITERATURE & COMMUNITY 2015, 2015, : 99 - 99
  • [23] Critical discourse analysis and critical thinking: An experimental study in an EFL context
    Hashemi, Mohammad Reza
    Ghanizadeh, Afsaneh
    SYSTEM, 2012, 40 (01) : 37 - 47
  • [24] Implementing tasks that stimulate critical thinking in EFL classrooms
    Fuquen Martinez, Aida Yolima
    Jimenez Nino, Patricia Kim
    CUADERNOS DE LINGUISTICA HISPANICA, 2013, 21 : 143 - 158
  • [25] Critical thinking from the ground up: teachers' conceptions and practice in EFL classrooms
    Li, Li
    TEACHERS AND TEACHING, 2023, 29 (06) : 571 - 593
  • [26] Critical thinking in the AI era: An exploration of EFL students' perceptions, benefits, and limitations
    Darwin
    Rusdin, Diyenti
    Mukminatien, Nur
    Suryati, Nunung
    Laksmi, Ekaning D.
    Marzuki
    COGENT EDUCATION, 2024, 11 (01):
  • [27] The Effect of Teaching Critical Thinking on EFL Speaking Competence: A Meta-analysis
    Li, Qianru
    Chan, Kan Kan
    ENGLISH TEACHING AND LEARNING, 2024,
  • [28] Investigating the Correlation Between Pharmacy Student Performance on the Health Science Reasoning Test and a Critical Thinking Assignment
    Nornoo, Adwoa O.
    Jackson, Jonathan
    Axtell, Samantha
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL EDUCATION, 2017, 81 (02)
  • [29] Critical thinking, autonomous learning, and academic grit among preservice EFL teachers
    Yuece, Erkan
    THINKING SKILLS AND CREATIVITY, 2023, 50
  • [30] Music academic performance: effect of intrinsic motivation and critical thinking
    Leon, Jaime
    Nunez, Juan L.
    Ruiz-Alfonso, Zuleica
    Bordon, Beatriz
    REVISTA DE PSICODIDACTICA, 2015, 20 (02): : 377 - 391