Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of a Prescription Digital Therapeutic in Type 2 Diabetes

被引:1
|
作者
Davison, Niall J. [1 ]
Guthrie, Nicole L. [2 ]
Medland, Sarah [1 ]
Lupinacci, Paul [3 ]
Nordyke, Robert J. [4 ]
Berman, Mark A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Maple Hlth Grp, Manchester, England
[2] Better Therapeut, 548 Market St, San Francisco, CA 49404 USA
[3] Villanova Univ, 800 Lancaster Ave, Villanova, PA USA
[4] Beta6 Consulting Grp, Entrada Rd, Topanga, CA USA
关键词
BT-001; Cost-effectiveness analysis; Glycemic control; Prescription digital therapeutic; Type; 2; diabetes; A1c;
D O I
10.1007/s12325-023-02752-2
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
IntroductionBT-001 (AspyreRx (TM)) prescription digital therapy, a form of personalized cognitive behavioral therapy, has demonstrated clinically meaningful and durable hemoglobin A1c reductions in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). The current study examined the cost-effectiveness of BT-001 plus standard of care (SoC) versus SoC alone in T2D over a lifetime horizon from a healthcare payer perspective.MethodsWe modeled the T2D pathway using an individual patient-level simulation; clinical data were sourced from the intention-to-treat subset of the BT-001 randomized clinical trial (RCT). SoC across both arms included the composition of oral and injectable treatments for T2D. Events were simulated using the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study Outcomes Model 2 risk equation. A 3-month model cycle length was used in the first year, then annual model cycles were used in line with the original risk engine specifications. Patient characteristics informed event equations and Monte Carlo random sampling was used to assess the occurrence of events within each model cycle. Incidence of hypoglycemic events, drug discontinuation, costs, and health utilities and disutility values were sourced from the literature.ResultsFrom a payer perspective, BT-001 plus SoC versus SoC alone was dominant with a gain in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) of 0.101 and cost savings of $7343 per patient over the lifetime horizon (i.e., more effective and less costly). BT-001 plus SoC was cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay of $100,000 per QALY (incremental net monetary benefit was $17,443). Savings with BT-001 were primarily driven by a reduction in drug acquisition costs. The reduction in hemoglobin A1c with BT-001 was associated with fewer T2D complications.ConclusionsBT-001 plus SoC was estimated to dominate SoC alone over the lifetime horizon from a payer perspective, suggesting that using BT-001 can empower patients to better manage their diabetes with the potential for lifelong advantages.
引用
收藏
页码:806 / 825
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of a Prescription Digital Therapeutic in Type 2 Diabetes
    Niall J. Davison
    Nicole L. Guthrie
    Sarah Medland
    Paul Lupinacci
    Robert J. Nordyke
    Mark A. Berman
    Advances in Therapy, 2024, 41 : 806 - 825
  • [2] THE COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS OF VIDALGLIPTIN IN TYPE 2 DIABETES IN POLAND
    Walczak, J.
    Nogas, G.
    Gebus, E.
    Pawlik, D.
    Pacocha, K.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2009, 12 (07) : A406 - A406
  • [3] Screening for type 2 diabetes mellitus: A cost-effectiveness analysis
    Hoerger, TJ
    Harris, R
    Hicks, KA
    Donahue, K
    Sorensen, S
    Engelgau, M
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2004, 140 (09) : 689 - 699
  • [4] Cost-effectiveness of treatment of type 2 diabetes
    Eastman, RC
    DIABETES CARE, 1998, 21 (03) : 464 - 465
  • [5] The cost-effectiveness of screening for type 2 diabetes
    Engelgau, MM
    Narayan, KMV
    Thompson, TJ
    Boyle, JP
    Williamson, DF
    Manninen, DL
    Dong, FB
    Orians, CE
    Dasbach, EJ
    Teutsch, SM
    Eastman, R
    Herman, WH
    Songer, TJ
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 280 (20): : 1757 - 1763
  • [6] Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the EndoBarrier Device in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes
    Sen Gupta, Piya
    Armstrong, Stephanie
    Amiel, Stephanie A.
    Ryder, Robert E.
    Pennington, Mark W.
    DIABETES, 2018, 67
  • [7] The Cost-Effectiveness of Supplemental Carnosine in Type 2 Diabetes
    Menon, Kirthi
    de Courten, Barbora
    Magliano, Dianna J.
    Ademi, Zanfina
    Liew, Danny
    Zomer, Ella
    NUTRIENTS, 2022, 14 (01)
  • [8] Cost-effectiveness of primary prevention of type 2 diabetes
    Icks, A.
    Chernyak, N.
    Klein, A.
    Brinks, R.
    Genz, J.
    Giani, G.
    DIABETOLOGE, 2011, 7 (02): : 92 - 98
  • [9] COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF EXERCISE PROGRAMS IN TYPE 2 DIABETES
    Coyle, Doug
    Coyle, Kathryn
    Kenny, Glen P.
    Boule, Normand G.
    Wells, George A.
    Fortier, Michelle
    Reid, Robert D.
    Phillips, Penny
    Sigal, Ronald J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2012, 28 (03) : 228 - 234
  • [10] COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS OF DRUG THERAPIES FOR DIABETES MELLITUS TYPE 2 IN CHILE
    Balmaceda, C.
    Abbott, T.
    Armijo, N.
    Zamorano, P.
    Espinoza, M. A.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2022, 25 (12) : S127 - S128