Multifactor configurations of coal power technology in China substantially differ in life-cycle environmental impacts

被引:4
|
作者
Li, Junjie [1 ,2 ]
Yan, Yulong [1 ]
Wang, Yirong [1 ]
Wang, Jia [1 ]
Cao, Zimeng [1 ]
Hu, Kexin [1 ]
Li, Menggang [3 ,4 ]
Lu, Xi [5 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Jiaotong Univ, Engn Res Ctr Clean & Low carbon Technol Intelligen, Sch Environm, Minist Educ, Beijing 100044, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Jiaotong Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing 100044, Peoples R China
[3] Beijing Jiaotong Univ, Natl Acad Econ Secur, Beijing 100044, Peoples R China
[4] Beijing Jiaotong Univ, Beijing Lab Natl Econ Secur Early Warning Engn, Beijing 100044, Peoples R China
[5] Tsinghua Univ, Sch Environm, State Key Joint Lab Environm Simulat & Pollut Cont, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
[6] Tsinghua Univ, Inst Carbon Neutral, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
[7] Tsinghua Univ, Beijing Lab Environm Frontier Technol, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
基金
中国博士后科学基金; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Electrical energy; Operating parameter; Boiler type; Cooling approach; Turbine mode; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; ELECTRICITY-GENERATION; CARBON EMISSIONS; ENERGY USE; WATER; CONSUMPTION; CAPTURE; SYSTEM; PLANT;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.168132
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The expansion of coal power in China has led to a coexistence of multiple technologies, whereas differences in environmental impacts of each other remain hitherto unclear. This gap is largely a result of the difficulty of fully covering the factors that significantly affect environmental performances and the lack of fine data inventory. The limitation welcomes an approach that can go well beyond characterizing coal power technology with a single factor. To this end, we surveyed the information data for all coal power units in China to couple four factors (viz. operating parameter, boiler type, cooling approach, and turbine mode) into 22 types of multifactor technology configurations, as well as the first-hand operating data of nearly half of all coal power units in China to compile an elaborate data inventory that each configuration includes 88 input and output data. These fine data were modeled by the life cycle assessment method of CML 2016 to quantify twelve environmental impact categories. The results show substantial differences in environmental impacts exist for different technology configurations. High operating parameters gain environmental friendliness but the diversification of boiler type and cooling approach to improve the applicability of coal quality and water resources increases environmental impacts. The insignificant impact of the turbine mode is owning to the exergy allocation that eliminates the quality gap in electrical and thermal energy. The technology-level differences are aggregated into the provincial level by various configuration structures, which show markedly spatial heterogeneity varying by impact categories. This implies a great potential for structural adjustment and an overall improvement requires cleaner production beyond that, focused on the coal power generation process and its upstream coal supply process. Our modeling shows a majority of results with an uncertainty of lower than 10 %, which is robust for the proposal of policy suggestions.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Life-cycle environmental burdens of ethylene production in the context of China's chemical feedstock transition from naphtha to coal and shale gas by-product of ethane
    Qian, Huimin
    Zhao, Yueru
    Qin, Fen
    Song, Guobao
    ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2023, 101
  • [42] A Life Cycle Analysis of Deploying Coking Technology to Utilize Low-Rank Coal in China
    Li, Yan
    Wang, Guoshun
    Li, Zhaohao
    Yuan, Jiahai
    Gao, Dan
    Zhang, Heng
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (12)
  • [43] Transit-oriented smart growth can reduce life-cycle environmental impacts and household costs in Los Angeles
    Nahlik, Matthew J.
    Chester, Mikhail V.
    TRANSPORT POLICY, 2014, 35 : 21 - 30
  • [44] Life cycle assessment of typical methanol production routes: The environmental impacts analysis and power optimization
    Chen, Zhuo
    Shen, Qun
    Sun, Nannan
    Wei, Wei
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 220 : 408 - 416
  • [45] Floating wind power in deep-sea area: Life cycle assessment of environmental impacts
    Yuan, Weiyu
    Feng, Jing-Chun
    Zhang, Si
    Sun, Liwei
    Cai, Yanpeng
    Yang, Zhifeng
    Sheng, Songwei
    ADVANCES IN APPLIED ENERGY, 2023, 9
  • [46] Environmental Performance Analysis of Cement Production with CO2 Capture and Storage Technology in a Life-Cycle Perspective
    An, Jing
    Middleton, Richard S.
    Li, Yingnan
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (09)
  • [47] Life cycle assessment shows that retrofitting coal-fired power plants with fuel cells will substantially reduce greenhouse gas emissions
    Yang, Fan
    Jia, Lichao
    Zhou, Ya
    Guan, Dabo
    Feng, Kuishuang
    Choi, Yongrok
    Zhang, Ning
    Li, Jiashuo
    ONE EARTH, 2022, 5 (04): : 392 - 402
  • [48] Recycling routes of lithium-ion batteries: A critical review of the development status, the process performance, and life-cycle environmental impacts
    Wagner-Wenz, Ronja
    Berberich, Katrin
    Weidenkaff, Anke
    van Zuilichem, Albert-Jan
    Gollner-Volker, Laura
    Schebek, Liselotte
    MRS ENERGY & SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 10 (01) : 1 - 34
  • [49] Evaluating environmental impacts of alternative construction waste management approaches using supply-chain-linked life-cycle analysis
    Kucukvar, Murat
    Egilmez, Gokhan
    Tatari, Omer
    WASTE MANAGEMENT & RESEARCH, 2014, 32 (06) : 500 - 508
  • [50] Life-cycle cost assessment of conventional and self-centering steel frames in seismic zones: An extra focus on environmental impacts
    Ping, Boyan
    Fang, Cheng
    Hu, Yue
    Yu, Shengxin
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2025, 325