Multifactor configurations of coal power technology in China substantially differ in life-cycle environmental impacts

被引:4
|
作者
Li, Junjie [1 ,2 ]
Yan, Yulong [1 ]
Wang, Yirong [1 ]
Wang, Jia [1 ]
Cao, Zimeng [1 ]
Hu, Kexin [1 ]
Li, Menggang [3 ,4 ]
Lu, Xi [5 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Jiaotong Univ, Engn Res Ctr Clean & Low carbon Technol Intelligen, Sch Environm, Minist Educ, Beijing 100044, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Jiaotong Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing 100044, Peoples R China
[3] Beijing Jiaotong Univ, Natl Acad Econ Secur, Beijing 100044, Peoples R China
[4] Beijing Jiaotong Univ, Beijing Lab Natl Econ Secur Early Warning Engn, Beijing 100044, Peoples R China
[5] Tsinghua Univ, Sch Environm, State Key Joint Lab Environm Simulat & Pollut Cont, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
[6] Tsinghua Univ, Inst Carbon Neutral, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
[7] Tsinghua Univ, Beijing Lab Environm Frontier Technol, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
基金
中国博士后科学基金; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Electrical energy; Operating parameter; Boiler type; Cooling approach; Turbine mode; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; ELECTRICITY-GENERATION; CARBON EMISSIONS; ENERGY USE; WATER; CONSUMPTION; CAPTURE; SYSTEM; PLANT;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.168132
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The expansion of coal power in China has led to a coexistence of multiple technologies, whereas differences in environmental impacts of each other remain hitherto unclear. This gap is largely a result of the difficulty of fully covering the factors that significantly affect environmental performances and the lack of fine data inventory. The limitation welcomes an approach that can go well beyond characterizing coal power technology with a single factor. To this end, we surveyed the information data for all coal power units in China to couple four factors (viz. operating parameter, boiler type, cooling approach, and turbine mode) into 22 types of multifactor technology configurations, as well as the first-hand operating data of nearly half of all coal power units in China to compile an elaborate data inventory that each configuration includes 88 input and output data. These fine data were modeled by the life cycle assessment method of CML 2016 to quantify twelve environmental impact categories. The results show substantial differences in environmental impacts exist for different technology configurations. High operating parameters gain environmental friendliness but the diversification of boiler type and cooling approach to improve the applicability of coal quality and water resources increases environmental impacts. The insignificant impact of the turbine mode is owning to the exergy allocation that eliminates the quality gap in electrical and thermal energy. The technology-level differences are aggregated into the provincial level by various configuration structures, which show markedly spatial heterogeneity varying by impact categories. This implies a great potential for structural adjustment and an overall improvement requires cleaner production beyond that, focused on the coal power generation process and its upstream coal supply process. Our modeling shows a majority of results with an uncertainty of lower than 10 %, which is robust for the proposal of policy suggestions.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Infrastructure and automobile shifts: positioning transit to reduce life-cycle environmental impacts for urban sustainability goals
    Chester, Mikhail
    Pincetl, Stephanie
    Elizabeth, Zoe
    Eisenstein, William
    Matute, Juan
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2013, 8 (01):
  • [32] A Call for Technology Developers To Apply Life Cycle and Market Perspectives When Assessing the Potential Environmental Impacts of Chemical Technology Projects
    Hunter, Shawn E.
    Helling, Richard K.
    INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2015, 54 (16) : 4003 - 4010
  • [33] Life cycle analysis of direct and indirect coal liquefaction for vehicle power in China
    Gao, Dan
    Ye, Chao
    Ren, Xiangkun
    Zhang, Yuning
    FUEL PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 169 : 42 - 49
  • [34] Environmental Burdens of China's Propylene manufacturing: Comparative life-cycle assessment and scenario analysis
    Lv, Lin
    Song, Guobao
    Zhao, Xinyue
    Chen, Jingwen
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 799
  • [35] Life-cycle comparisons of economic and environmental consequences for pig production with four different models in China
    Wu, Huijun
    Liu, Yongxin
    Dai, Chengjuan
    Ye, Yuanyuan
    Zhu, Huimin
    Fang, Weixin
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2024, 31 (14) : 21668 - 21686
  • [36] Environmental impact assessment of different power generation strategies in Oman: A comparative life-cycle analysis
    Al Rashdi, Zuhoor
    Barghash, Hind
    Al Habsi, Fahmi
    Okedu, Kenneth E.
    HELIYON, 2024, 10 (18)
  • [37] Life cycle assessment of Power-to-Gas (PtG) technology - Evaluation of system configurations of renewable hydrogen and methane production
    Litheko, Andrew
    Oboirien, Bilainu
    Patel, Bilal
    SUSTAINABLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES AND ASSESSMENTS, 2023, 60
  • [38] Sustainable urban water resources management considering life-cycle environmental impacts of water utilization under uncertainty
    Cai, Yanpeng
    Yue, Wencong
    Xu, Linyu
    Yang, Zhifeng
    Rong, Qiangqiang
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2016, 108 : 21 - 40
  • [39] Environmental effects evaluation of photovoltaic power industry in China on life cycle assessment
    Pu, Yanru
    Wang, Peng
    Wang, Yuyi
    Qiao, Wenhui
    Wang, Lu
    Zhang, Yuhu
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 278
  • [40] Assessment and projection of environmental impacts of food waste treatment in China from life cycle perspectives
    Liu, Min
    Ogunmoroti, Abiodun
    Liu, Wei
    Li, Muyang
    Bi, Mengyan
    Liu, Wenqiu
    Cui, Zhaojie
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 807