Multifactor configurations of coal power technology in China substantially differ in life-cycle environmental impacts

被引:4
|
作者
Li, Junjie [1 ,2 ]
Yan, Yulong [1 ]
Wang, Yirong [1 ]
Wang, Jia [1 ]
Cao, Zimeng [1 ]
Hu, Kexin [1 ]
Li, Menggang [3 ,4 ]
Lu, Xi [5 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Jiaotong Univ, Engn Res Ctr Clean & Low carbon Technol Intelligen, Sch Environm, Minist Educ, Beijing 100044, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Jiaotong Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing 100044, Peoples R China
[3] Beijing Jiaotong Univ, Natl Acad Econ Secur, Beijing 100044, Peoples R China
[4] Beijing Jiaotong Univ, Beijing Lab Natl Econ Secur Early Warning Engn, Beijing 100044, Peoples R China
[5] Tsinghua Univ, Sch Environm, State Key Joint Lab Environm Simulat & Pollut Cont, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
[6] Tsinghua Univ, Inst Carbon Neutral, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
[7] Tsinghua Univ, Beijing Lab Environm Frontier Technol, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
基金
中国博士后科学基金; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Electrical energy; Operating parameter; Boiler type; Cooling approach; Turbine mode; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; ELECTRICITY-GENERATION; CARBON EMISSIONS; ENERGY USE; WATER; CONSUMPTION; CAPTURE; SYSTEM; PLANT;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.168132
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The expansion of coal power in China has led to a coexistence of multiple technologies, whereas differences in environmental impacts of each other remain hitherto unclear. This gap is largely a result of the difficulty of fully covering the factors that significantly affect environmental performances and the lack of fine data inventory. The limitation welcomes an approach that can go well beyond characterizing coal power technology with a single factor. To this end, we surveyed the information data for all coal power units in China to couple four factors (viz. operating parameter, boiler type, cooling approach, and turbine mode) into 22 types of multifactor technology configurations, as well as the first-hand operating data of nearly half of all coal power units in China to compile an elaborate data inventory that each configuration includes 88 input and output data. These fine data were modeled by the life cycle assessment method of CML 2016 to quantify twelve environmental impact categories. The results show substantial differences in environmental impacts exist for different technology configurations. High operating parameters gain environmental friendliness but the diversification of boiler type and cooling approach to improve the applicability of coal quality and water resources increases environmental impacts. The insignificant impact of the turbine mode is owning to the exergy allocation that eliminates the quality gap in electrical and thermal energy. The technology-level differences are aggregated into the provincial level by various configuration structures, which show markedly spatial heterogeneity varying by impact categories. This implies a great potential for structural adjustment and an overall improvement requires cleaner production beyond that, focused on the coal power generation process and its upstream coal supply process. Our modeling shows a majority of results with an uncertainty of lower than 10 %, which is robust for the proposal of policy suggestions.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Assessing the life cycle environmental impacts of wind power: A review of present knowledge and research needs
    Arvesen, Anders
    Hertwich, Edgar G.
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2012, 16 (08) : 5994 - 6006
  • [22] Energy and environmental life-cycle impacts of solar-assisted systems: The application of the tool "ELISA"
    Longo, Sonia
    Beccali, Marco
    Cellura, Maurizio
    Guarino, Francesco
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2020, 145 : 29 - 40
  • [23] A review of fleet-based life-cycle approaches focusing on energy and environmental impacts of vehicles
    Garcia, Rita
    Freire, Fausto
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2017, 79 : 935 - 945
  • [24] Considering life-cycle environmental impacts and society's willingness for optimizing construction and demolition waste management fee: An empirical study of China
    Wang, Jiayuan
    Wu, Huanyu
    Tam, Vivian W. Y.
    Zuo, Jian
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 206 : 1004 - 1014
  • [25] Life cycle environmental impacts of five technological routes for straw utilisation in China
    Li, Xiang
    Du, Yueying
    Chang, Huimin
    Ai, Jing
    Zhao, Yan
    BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2024, 183
  • [26] Environmental impacts of shale gas development in China: A hybrid life cycle analysis
    Wang, Jianliang
    Liu, Mingming
    McLellan, Benjamin C.
    Tang, Xu
    Feng, Lianyong
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2017, 120 : 38 - 45
  • [27] Life Cycle Water Use of Energy Production and Its Environmental Impacts in China
    Zhang, Chao
    Anadon, Laura Diaz
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 47 (24) : 14459 - 14467
  • [28] Life cycle environmental impacts of decommissioning Magnox nuclear power plants in the UK
    Wallbridge, Steve
    Banford, Anthony
    Azapagic, Adisa
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2013, 18 (05) : 990 - 1008
  • [29] Life cycle environmental impacts of electricity production by solarthermal power plants in Spain
    Lechon, Yolanda
    de la Rua, Cristina
    Saez, Rosa
    JOURNAL OF SOLAR ENERGY ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2008, 130 (02): : 0210121 - 0210127
  • [30] Assessing the Energetic and Environmental Impacts of the Operation and Maintenance of Spanish Sewer Networks from a Life-Cycle Perspective
    Petit-Boix, Anna
    Sanjuan-Delmas, David
    Chenel, Sergio
    Marin, Desiree
    Gasol, Carles M.
    Farreny, Ramon
    Villalba, Gara
    Suarez-Ojeda, Maria Eugenia
    Gabarrell, Xavier
    Josa, Alejandro
    Rieradevall, Joan
    WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2015, 29 (08) : 2581 - 2597