Multifactor configurations of coal power technology in China substantially differ in life-cycle environmental impacts

被引:4
|
作者
Li, Junjie [1 ,2 ]
Yan, Yulong [1 ]
Wang, Yirong [1 ]
Wang, Jia [1 ]
Cao, Zimeng [1 ]
Hu, Kexin [1 ]
Li, Menggang [3 ,4 ]
Lu, Xi [5 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Jiaotong Univ, Engn Res Ctr Clean & Low carbon Technol Intelligen, Sch Environm, Minist Educ, Beijing 100044, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Jiaotong Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing 100044, Peoples R China
[3] Beijing Jiaotong Univ, Natl Acad Econ Secur, Beijing 100044, Peoples R China
[4] Beijing Jiaotong Univ, Beijing Lab Natl Econ Secur Early Warning Engn, Beijing 100044, Peoples R China
[5] Tsinghua Univ, Sch Environm, State Key Joint Lab Environm Simulat & Pollut Cont, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
[6] Tsinghua Univ, Inst Carbon Neutral, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
[7] Tsinghua Univ, Beijing Lab Environm Frontier Technol, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
基金
中国博士后科学基金; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Electrical energy; Operating parameter; Boiler type; Cooling approach; Turbine mode; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; ELECTRICITY-GENERATION; CARBON EMISSIONS; ENERGY USE; WATER; CONSUMPTION; CAPTURE; SYSTEM; PLANT;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.168132
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The expansion of coal power in China has led to a coexistence of multiple technologies, whereas differences in environmental impacts of each other remain hitherto unclear. This gap is largely a result of the difficulty of fully covering the factors that significantly affect environmental performances and the lack of fine data inventory. The limitation welcomes an approach that can go well beyond characterizing coal power technology with a single factor. To this end, we surveyed the information data for all coal power units in China to couple four factors (viz. operating parameter, boiler type, cooling approach, and turbine mode) into 22 types of multifactor technology configurations, as well as the first-hand operating data of nearly half of all coal power units in China to compile an elaborate data inventory that each configuration includes 88 input and output data. These fine data were modeled by the life cycle assessment method of CML 2016 to quantify twelve environmental impact categories. The results show substantial differences in environmental impacts exist for different technology configurations. High operating parameters gain environmental friendliness but the diversification of boiler type and cooling approach to improve the applicability of coal quality and water resources increases environmental impacts. The insignificant impact of the turbine mode is owning to the exergy allocation that eliminates the quality gap in electrical and thermal energy. The technology-level differences are aggregated into the provincial level by various configuration structures, which show markedly spatial heterogeneity varying by impact categories. This implies a great potential for structural adjustment and an overall improvement requires cleaner production beyond that, focused on the coal power generation process and its upstream coal supply process. Our modeling shows a majority of results with an uncertainty of lower than 10 %, which is robust for the proposal of policy suggestions.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A life-cycle comparison of the energy, environmental and economic impacts of coal versus wood pellets for generating heat in China
    Wang, Changbo
    Chang, Yuan
    Zhang, Lixiao
    Pang, Mingyue
    Hao, Yan
    ENERGY, 2017, 120 : 374 - 384
  • [2] Life cycle assessment and environmental cost accounting of coal-fired power generation in China
    Wang, Jinman
    Wang, Ruogu
    Zhu, Yucheng
    Li, Jiayan
    ENERGY POLICY, 2018, 115 : 374 - 384
  • [3] Evaluating environmental impacts of pig slurry treatment technologies with a life-cycle perspective
    Yuan, Zengwei
    Pan, Xiao
    Chen, Tianming
    Liu, Xuewei
    Zhang, You
    Jiang, Songyan
    Sheng, Hu
    Zhang, Ling
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 188 : 840 - 850
  • [4] A comparative life-cycle assessment of hydro-, nuclear and wind power: A China study
    Wang, Like
    Wang, Yuan
    Du, Huibin
    Zuo, Jian
    Li, Rita Yi Man
    Zhou, Zhihua
    Bi, Fenfen
    Garvlehn, McSimon P.
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2019, 249 : 37 - 45
  • [5] High-resolution analysis of life-cycle carbon emissions from China's coal-fired power industry: A provincial perspective
    Li, Junjie
    Wang, Yonggang
    Xu, Deping
    Xie, Kechang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2020, 100
  • [6] The life-cycle energy and environmental emissions of a typical offshore wind farm in China
    Yang, Juhua
    Chang, Yuan
    Zhang, Lixiao
    Hao, Yan
    Yan, Qin
    Wang, Changbo
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 180 : 316 - 324
  • [7] Sensitivity analysis of design variables in life-cycle environmental impacts of buildings
    Zhou, Yijun
    Tam, Vivian WY.
    Le, Khoa N.
    JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING, 2023, 65
  • [8] The GHG Intensities of Wind Power Plants in China from a Life-Cycle Perspective: The Impacts of Geographical Location, Turbine Technology and Management Level
    Feng, Yashuang
    Zhang, Lixiao
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (05)
  • [9] Life cycle assessment of environmental impacts and energy demand for capacitive deionization technology
    Yu, Ting-Hua
    Shiu, Huan-Yu
    Lee, Mengshan
    Chiueh, Pei-Te
    Hou, Chia-Hung
    DESALINATION, 2016, 399 : 53 - 60
  • [10] Examining the life-cycle environmental impacts of desalination: A case study in the State of Qatar
    Mannan, Mehzabeen
    Alhaj, Mohamed
    Mabrouk, Abdel Nasser
    Al-Ghamdi, Sami G.
    DESALINATION, 2019, 452 : 238 - 246