Effect of Commercial Mouth Rinses on Physical Properties of Conventional and Bulk-fill Resin Composites

Objective: To evaluate the effects of commercial mouth rinses on color, roughness, sorption (SR), and solubility (SL) of resin composites. Methods and Materials: Disc-shaped specimens (stage I: 6 mm x 2 mm; stage II: 10 mm x 1.5 mm) were made from the following resin composites (n=10): conventional nanofilled (Filtek Z350XT, 3M Oral Care), conventional nanohybrid (Luna, SDI), bulk-fill nanofilled (Filtek One Bulk-Fill, 3M Oral Care), and bulk-fill nanohybrid (Aura Bulk-Fill, SDI) exposed to distilled water (control), blue mouth rinse without alcohol (Colgate Total 12 Clean Mint, Colgate-Palmolive), or blue mouth rinse with alcohol and essential oil (Listerine Tartar Control, Johnson & Johnson). In stage I, tests were performed at the baseline, and after the immersion in solution time points to evaluate coordinates of the CIEL*a*b* system (Delta L*,Delta a*,Delta b*), general color change (Delta E-ab,Delta E-00, and Delta SGU), and surface roughness (Ra). In stage II, SR and SL were evaluated (ISO 4049:2019) after immersion in the solutions for 7 days. The results were evaluated by generalized linear models (Ra, SR), Kruskal-Wallis, and Dunn tests (color, SL), with alpha= 0.05. Results: There were no significative differences for Ra between the solutions. Both mouth rinses promoted significantly negative Delta L* (Luna), Delta a* (Filtek One Bulk-fill), and Delta b* (all materials except conventional nanofilled resin composite). Mouth rinse without alcohol promoted significantly negative Delta a* on all resin composites tested. Both mouth rinses promoted higher Delta E-ab and Delta E-00 for bulk-fill resin composites compared to control. Mouth rinse with alcohol caused higher Delta SGU for bulk-fill nanofilled resin composite. It also promoted greater SR in all the resin composites compared with mouth rinse without alcohol and higher SR in nanohybrid resin composites compared with control. Both mouth rinses promoted higher SL values in Luna and differed significantly from control. Conclusions: The physical properties were manufacturer dependent and mediated by mouth rinses. The mouth rinses promoted color changes in the resin composites, pointing out that bulk-fill resin composites were more affected by these effects, especially when the mouth rinse contained essential oil and alcohol.