Identifying predictive biomarkers for repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation response in depression patients with explainability

被引:7
作者
Squires, Matthew [1 ]
Tao, Xiaohui [1 ]
Elangovan, Soman [2 ]
Gururajan, Raj [3 ]
Zhou, Xujuan [3 ]
Li, Yuefeng [4 ]
Acharya, U. Rajendra [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southern Queensland, Sch Math Phys & Comp, Toowoomba, Australia
[2] Belmont Private Hosp, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[3] Univ Southern Queensland, Sch Business, Springfield, Australia
[4] Queensland Univ Technol, Sch Comp Sci, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[5] Univ Southern Queensland, Sch Math Phys & Comp, Springfield, Australia
关键词
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation; Deep learning; Explainable AI; Depression; RTMS TREATMENT; PERCEPTRON;
D O I
10.1016/j.cmpb.2023.107771
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) is an evidence-based treatment for depression. However, the patterns of response to this treatment modality are inconsistent. Whilst many people see a significant reduction in the severity of their depression following rTMS treatment, some patients do not. To support and improve patient outcomes, recent work is exploring the possibility of using Machine Learning to predict rTMS treatment outcomes. Our proposed model is the first to combine functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) connectivity with deep learning techniques to predict treatment outcomes before treatment starts. Furthermore, with the use of Explainable AI (XAI) techniques, we identify potential biomarkers that may discriminate between rTMS responders and non-responders. Our experiments utilize 200 runs of repeated bootstrap sampling on two rTMS datasets. We compare performances between our proposed feedforward deep neural network against existing methods, and compare the average accuracy, balanced accuracy and F1-score on a held-out test set. The results of these experiments show that our model outperforms existing methods with an average accuracy of 0.9423, balanced accuracy of 0.9423, and F1-score of 0.9461 in a sample of 61 patients. We found that functional connectivity measures between the Subgenual Anterior Cingulate Cortex and Centeral Opercular Cortex are a key determinant of rTMS treatment response. This knowledge provides psychiatrists with further information to explore the potential mechanisms of responses to rTMS treatment. Our developed prototype is ready to be deployed across large datasets in multiple centres and different countries.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   An unsupervised learning approach for multilayer perceptron networks [J].
Aldana-Bobadila, Edwin ;
Kuri-Morales, Angel ;
Lopez-Arevalo, Ivan ;
Rios-Alvarado, Ana B. .
SOFT COMPUTING, 2019, 23 (21) :11001-11013
[2]   Guidelines for Human-AI Interaction [J].
Amershi, Saleema ;
Weld, Dan ;
Vorvoreanu, Mihaela ;
Fourney, Adam ;
Nushi, Besmira ;
Collisson, Penny ;
Suh, Jina ;
Iqbal, Shamsi ;
Bennett, Paul N. ;
Inkpen, Kori ;
Teevan, Jaime ;
Kikin-Gil, Ruth ;
Horvitz, Eric .
CHI 2019: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2019 CHI CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYSTEMS, 2019,
[3]   Differentiating responders and non-responders to rTMS treatment for depression after one week using resting EEG connectivity measures [J].
Bailey, N. W. ;
Hoy, K. E. ;
Rogasch, N. C. ;
Thomson, R. H. ;
McQueen, S. ;
Elliot, D. ;
Sullivan, C. M. ;
Fulcher, B. D. ;
Daskalakis, Z. J. ;
Fitzgerald, P. B. .
JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2019, 242 :68-79
[4]   Responders to rTMS for depression show increased fronto-midline theta and theta connectivity compared to non-responders [J].
Bailey, N. W. ;
Hoy, K. E. ;
Rogasch, N. C. ;
Thomson, R. H. ;
McQueen, S. ;
Elliot, D. ;
Sullivan, C. M. ;
Fulcher, B. D. ;
Daskalakis, Z. J. ;
Fitzgerald, P. B. .
BRAIN STIMULATION, 2018, 11 (01) :190-203
[5]   The Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-21) as a Screener for Depression in Substance Use Disorder Inpatients: A Pilot Study [J].
Beaufort, Ilse N. ;
De Weert-Van Oene, Gerdien H. ;
Buwalda, Victor A. J. ;
de Leeuw, J. Rob J. ;
Goudriaan, Anna E. .
EUROPEAN ADDICTION RESEARCH, 2017, 23 (05) :260-268
[6]   Differences in cohort study data affect external validation of artificial intelligence models for predictive diagnostics of dementia-lessons for translation into clinical practice [J].
Birkenbihl, Colin ;
Emon, Mohammad Asif ;
Vrooman, Henri ;
Westwood, Sarah ;
Lovestone, Simon ;
Hofmann-Apitius, Martin ;
Froehlich, Holger .
EPMA JOURNAL, 2020, 11 (03) :367-376
[7]   ARPNet: Antidepressant Response Prediction Network for Major Depressive Disorder [J].
Chang, Buru ;
Choi, Yonghwa ;
Jeon, Minji ;
Lee, Junhyun ;
Han, Kyu-Man ;
Kim, Aram ;
Ham, Byung-Joo ;
Kang, Jaewoo .
GENES, 2019, 10 (11)
[8]  
Chollet F., 2021, Deep Learning with Python, V2nd ed.
[9]   Transcranial magnetic stimulation for treatment-resistant depression: Naturalistic treatment outcomes for younger versus older patients [J].
Conelea, Christine A. ;
Philip, Noah S. ;
Yip, Agustin G. ;
Barnes, Jennifer L. ;
Niedzwiecki, Matthew J. ;
Greenberg, Benjamin D. ;
Tyrka, Audrey R. ;
Carpenter, Linda L. .
JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2017, 217 :42-47
[10]   Artificial intelligence and the future of psychiatry: Insights from a global physician survey [J].
Doraiswamy, P. Murali ;
Blease, Charlotte ;
Bodner, Kaylee .
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN MEDICINE, 2020, 102