Weekly versus triweekly cisplatin treatment in patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal cancer during concurrent chemoradiotherapy

被引:1
|
作者
Li, Xin [1 ]
Li, Lei [2 ]
Sun, Ruimei [2 ]
Gao, Jingyan [1 ]
Li, Zhengfei [1 ]
Xue, Yongyuan [1 ]
Zhu, Lixiu [1 ]
Xu, Tianrui [1 ]
Sun, Chuanzheng [2 ]
Xi, Yan [2 ]
Xiong, Wei [1 ]
机构
[1] Kunming Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 3, Yunnan Canc Hosp, Dept Radiotherapy, 519 Kunzhou Rd, Kunming, Yunnan, Peoples R China
[2] Kunming Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 3, Yunnan Canc Hosp, Dept Head & Neck Surg,Sect 2, 519 Kunzhou Rd, Kunming, Yunnan, Peoples R China
关键词
Nasopharyngeal cancer; Concurrent chemoradiotherapy; Cisplatin; Meta-analysis; PLUS ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY; RANDOMIZED PHASE-II; RADIATION-THERAPY; 3-WEEKLY CISPLATIN; DOSE CISPLATIN; CARCINOMA; RADIOTHERAPY; METAANALYSIS; MULTICENTER; HEAD;
D O I
10.1186/s40001-023-01297-y
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
BackgroundFor patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal cancer (LA-NPC), concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) is the standardized treatment. However, whether a weekly or triweekly cisplatin regimen should be used during CCRT is controversial. Therefore, we conducted this meta-analysis to explore differences in the effects and toxicities of the two regimens.MethodsWe searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library (until June 10, 2022). We evaluated overall survival (OS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS), disease-free survival (DFS) and grade >= 3 adverse events. The effect indices were hazard ratios (HRs) and odds ratios (ORs), and Review Manager software 5.4 (RevMan 5.4) was used for computations.ResultsWe identified 7 studies in our analysis. There was no significant difference in OS (HR = 1.00, 95% CI 0.73-1.38, P = 0.99), DMFS (HR = 0.84, 95% CI 0.58-1.22, P = 0.36), LRFS (HR = 0.91, 95% CI 0.63-1.32, P = 0.62) or DFS (HR = 0.93, 95% CI 0.56-1.56; P = 0.78) between the weekly and triweekly cisplatin regimens. We found that the weekly cisplatin regimen was more likely to cause grade >= 3 hematological toxicity events than the triweekly cisplatin regimen. In addition, subgroup analyses revealed that patients undergoing CCRT and CCRT plus adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) had similar OS or DFS.ConclusionWeekly and triweekly cisplatin regimens had similar efficacy for LA-NPC. The triweekly regimen may replace the weekly regimen for LA-NPC because of lower toxicity. Larger data accumulation and more multicenter clinical trials may be needed to verify these results.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL OF WEEKLY VS. TRIWEEKLY CISPLATIN-BASED CHEMOTHERAPY CONCURRENT WITH RADIOTHERAPY IN THE TREATMENT OF LOCALLY ADVANCED CERVICAL CANCER
    Ryu, Sang-Young
    Lee, Won-Moo
    Kim, Kidong
    Park, Sang-Il
    Kim, Beob-Jong
    Kim, Moon-Hong
    Choi, Seok-Cheol
    Cho, Chul-Koo
    Nam, Byung-Ho
    Lee, Eui-Don
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2011, 81 (04): : E577 - E581
  • [32] A pilot study of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin in patients with locally advanced biliary tract cancer
    Lee, Kyong Joo
    Yi, Seung Woo
    Cha, Jihye
    Seong, Jinsil
    Bang, Seungmin
    Song, Si Young
    Kim, Hee Man
    Park, Seung Woo
    CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2016, 78 (04) : 841 - 846
  • [33] Concurrent chemoradiotherapy with weekly docetaxel and cisplatin versus docetaxel and nedaplatin for locally advanced esophageal carcinoma
    Lu, Chunhui
    Liang, Ning
    Hu, Pingping
    Zhang, Jiandong
    Zhang, Xuede
    Liu, Yuanshui
    Lu, Chunxiao
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2018, 11 (08): : 8382 - 8391
  • [34] Comparison of therapeutic efficacy and toxicity of docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil (TPF)-based induction chemotherapy plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy and chemoradiotherapy alone in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma
    Chen, Ruijuan
    Lu, Yongkai
    Zhang, Yuemei
    He, Ruixin
    Tang, Fengwen
    Yuan, Wei
    Li, Yi
    Zhang, Xiaowei
    MEDICINE, 2021, 100 (42) : E27475
  • [35] Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with concurrent chemoradiotherapy in the treatment of nasopharyngeal cancer: Southern Tunisian experience
    Mnejja, Wafa
    Toumi, Nabil
    Fourati, Nejla
    Bouzguenda, Racem
    Ghorbel, Abdelmonem
    Frikha, Mounir
    Siala, Wicem
    Daoud, Jamel
    BULLETIN DU CANCER, 2018, 105 (05) : 450 - 457
  • [36] Gemcitabine-based Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Versus Chemotherapy Alone in Patients with Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer
    Wang, Bu-Hai
    Cao, Wen-Miao
    Yu, Jie
    Wang, Xiao-Lei
    ASIAN PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION, 2012, 13 (05) : 2129 - 2132
  • [37] Phase I Study of Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy With Weekly Cisplatin and Paclitaxel Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Cervical Carcinoma in Japanese Women
    Umayahara, Kenji
    Takeshima, Nobuhiro
    Nose, Takayuki
    Fujiwara, Kiyoshi
    Sugiyama, Yuko
    Utsugi, Kuniko
    Yamashita, Takashi
    Takizawa, Ken
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2009, 19 (04) : 723 - 727
  • [38] Comparison of Carboplatin- and Cisplatin-Based Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer Patients With Morbidity Risks
    Nam, Eun Ji
    Lee, Maria
    Yim, Ga Won
    Kim, Jae Hoon
    Kim, Sunghoon
    Kim, Sang Wun
    Kim, Jae Wook
    Kim, Young Tae
    ONCOLOGIST, 2013, 18 (07) : 843 - 849
  • [39] Weekly Cisplatin versus Standard Three-weekly Cisplatin in Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy of Head and Neck Cancer: the Baskent University Experience
    Kose, Fatih
    Besen, Ayberk
    Sumbul, Taner
    Sezer, Ahmet
    Karadeniz, Cemile
    Disel, Umut
    Altundag, Ozden
    Ozyilkan, Ozgur
    ASIAN PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION, 2011, 12 (05) : 1185 - 1188
  • [40] Chemoradiotherapy with weekly low-dose docetaxel and cisplatin concurrent with radiation for patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma, followed by adjuvant chemotherapy for selected patientsaEuro
    Nakahara, Susumu
    Hanamoto, Atsushi
    Seo, Yuji
    Miyaguchi, Shinichi
    Yamamoto, Yoshifumi
    Tomiyama, Yoichiro
    Yoshii, Tadashi
    Takenaka, Yukinori
    Yoshioka, Yasuo
    Isohashi, Fumiaki
    Ogawa, Kazuhiko
    Inohara, Hidenori
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 46 (10) : 903 - 910