What do we know about the selection of action research methodologies in primary science education? - A systematic literature review

被引:3
|
作者
Kamarudin, Muhammad Zulfadhli [1 ,2 ]
Mat Noor, Mohd Syafiq Aiman [3 ]
机构
[1] Sultan Idris Educ Univ, Fac Human Dev, Perak, Malaysia
[2] Sekolah Kebangsaan Taman Merdeka, Melaka, Malaysia
[3] Univ Leeds, Sch Educ, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
关键词
Systematic literature review; action research; methodological choices; primary science; science education; PROFESSIONAL-DEVELOPMENT; TEACHERS; QUALITY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1080/09650792.2023.2261502
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Since the development of the notion of the teacher-researcher, a range of published action research studies have focused on school-based pedagogy. Scholars agree that action research is an essential tool for teachers to improve their practice, but there is little known about the process underpinning teachers' choice of particular action research methodologies in primary science education. In this systematic literature review, 33 articles were reviewed to examine the methodological considerations teacher-researchers made when conducting action research within the primary school context, as well as the quality of the action plans and the impacts of the research on children's learning in science. The systematic review navigated existing primary science studies, focusing on methodological considerations in the choice of particular types of action research. With regards to the quality of action research studies, the reviewed articles had a good average score for all three types of validity. In terms of the effects of the employed action research methodologies, most studies demonstrated positive impacts on children's learning in science. Based on this review, it is recommended that future researchers be encouraged to carry out action research in their classroom settings, as most authors in the review favour this approach. Researchers should also examine the outcome, process, and democratic validity of their action research studies to generate better quality action plans. Lastly, primary school science teachers can adopt the various action research methodologies employed in this review since most studies support their positive impacts on children's learning in science.
引用
收藏
页码:825 / 847
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] What do we know about sibling attended birth? An integrative literature review
    Naber, Nora L.
    Miller, Suzanne
    Baddock, Sally A.
    MIDWIFERY, 2018, 63 : 24 - 32
  • [22] Consumer ethnocentrism: What we learned and what we need to know? - A systematic literature review
    Baber, Ruturaj
    Sankpal, Shilpa
    Baber, Prerana
    Gulati, Chanda
    COGENT BUSINESS & MANAGEMENT, 2024, 11 (01):
  • [23] A systematic literature review on meta sustainability labeling e What do we (not) know?
    Torma, Gabriele
    Thogersen, John
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 293
  • [24] What do we know about high performance teams in software engineering? Results from a systematic literature review
    Dutra, Alessandra C. S.
    Prikladnicki, Rafael
    Franca, Cesar
    PROCEEDINGS 41ST EUROMICRO CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING AND ADVANCED APPLICATIONS SEAA 2015, 2015, : 183 - 190
  • [25] What do we know about government public relations (GPR)? A systematic review of GPR in public relations literature
    Dong, Chuqing
    Zheng, Qi
    Morehouse, Jordan
    PUBLIC RELATIONS REVIEW, 2023, 49 (01)
  • [26] Action research in science education - an analytical review of the literature
    Laudonia, Ivano
    Mamlok-Naaman, Rachel
    Abels, Simone
    Eilks, Ingo
    EDUCATIONAL ACTION RESEARCH, 2018, 26 (03) : 480 - 495
  • [27] Two decades of research into SIEs and what do we know? A systematic review of the most influential literature and a proposed research agenda
    Brewster, Chris
    Suutari, Vesa
    Waxin, Marie-France
    JOURNAL OF GLOBAL MOBILITY-THE HOME OF EXPATRIATE MANAGEMENT RESEARCH, 2021, 9 (03) : 311 - 337
  • [28] A systematic literature review on network marketing: What do we know and where should we be heading?
    Chopra, Ishani Patharia
    Jebarajakirthy, Charles
    Acharyya, Moumita
    Saha, Raiswa
    Maseeh, Haroon Iqbal
    Nahar, Shamsun
    INDUSTRIAL MARKETING MANAGEMENT, 2023, 113 : 180 - 201
  • [29] What do we talk about when we talk about strategic renewal: a systematic literature review of 40 years of research
    Ciszewska-Mlinaric, Mariola
    Wojcik, Piotr
    CENTRAL EUROPEAN MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2023, 31 (03) : 416 - 441
  • [30] WHAT DO WE KNOW ABOUT FLOSS DEVELOPERS' ATTRACTION, RETENTION, AND COMMITMENT? A LITERATURE REVIEW
    Schilling, Andreas
    2014 47TH HAWAII INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEM SCIENCES (HICSS), 2014, : 4003 - 4012