Characterization of the stanford integrated psychosocial assessment for transplant for heart, liver, and kidney transplant candidates in Japan

被引:6
|
作者
Takano, Kosuke [1 ]
Oshibuchi, Hidehiro [1 ]
Kobayashi, Sayaka [1 ,2 ]
Tsutsui, Junko [1 ,3 ]
Ito, Satoko [1 ]
Kamba, Rumiko [1 ]
Akaho, Rie [1 ]
Nishimura, Katsuji [1 ]
机构
[1] Tokyo Womens Med Univ, Dept Psychiat, 8-1 Kawada Cho,Shinjuku Ku, Tokyo 1628666, Japan
[2] Saitama Med Univ, Saitama Med Ctr, Dept Psychiat, Saitama 1981, Kawagoe, Saitama 3508550, Japan
[3] Denen Chofu Univ, Fac Human Sci, 3-4-1 Higashiyurigaoka,Asao Ku, Kawasaki, Kanagawa 2158542, Japan
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
Organ-specific; Pre-transplant evaluation; Post-transplant outcomes; Psychosocial support; Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for transplantation; Transplant recipient; INTERRATER RELIABILITY; VERSION; SIPAT; PREDICTORS; SURVIVAL; VALIDITY;
D O I
10.1186/s13030-023-00281-6
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
BackgroundThe Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplantation (SIPAT) is a comprehensive psychosocial assessment proven useful for predicting the outcomes of organ transplantation that is expected to be useful in Japan. However, the characteristics of organ-specific SIPAT scores for organ transplant recipient candidates in Japan are unclear and, to date, the SIPAT has not been properly utilized in clinical practice. The purpose of this study was to present basic data that can be used to establish the relation between SIPAT scores and post-transplantation psychosocial outcomes as well as organ-specific outcomes.MethodsThis study included 167 transplant recipient candidates (25 heart, 71 liver, and 71 kidney) who completed a semi-structured interview based on the Japanese version of SIPAT (SIPAT-J) prior to transplantation. The differences between organs in terms of SIPAT scores and differences in SIPAT scores based on demographic data were comparatively analyzed.ResultsThe total SIPAT scores were higher for liver recipient candidates than for heart recipient candidates (P = .019). Regarding the subscales, SIPAT B (social support system) scores were higher for liver and kidney recipient candidates than for heart recipient candidates (P = .021), whereas SIPAT C (psychological stability and psychopathology) scores were higher for liver recipient candidates than for kidney recipient candidates (P = .002). Recipient candidates with a history of psychiatric treatment and those who were unemployed had higher SIPAT scores, regardless of the transplant organ, than recipient candidates without a history of psychiatric treatment and those who were employed (P < .001, P = .016, respectively).ConclusionsThere were notable differences in the total SIPAT-J and subscale scores among the liver, heart, and kidney recipient candidates. Each organ was associated with specific psychosocial issues that should be addressed before transplantation. Interventions such as information provision and patient education based on SIPAT assessment results for each organ may improve recipient post-transplant outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The Psychosocial Assessment of Candidates for Transplantation: A Cohort Study of its Association With Survival Among Lung Transplant Recipients
    Hitschfeld, Mario J.
    Schneekloth, Terry D.
    Kennedy, Cassie C.
    Rummans, Teresa A.
    Niazi, Shehzad K.
    Vasquez, Adriana R.
    Geske, Jennifer R.
    Petterson, Tanya M.
    Kremers, Walter K.
    Jowsey-Gregoire, Sheila G.
    PSYCHOSOMATICS, 2016, 57 (05) : 489 - 497
  • [42] Use of the Stanford Integrative Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant as a Pre-surgical Psychological Evaluation Tool for Bariatric Surgery
    Stephanie E. Punt
    Ashley C. Rhodes
    Stephen S. Ilardi
    Jessica L. Hamilton
    Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings, 2022, 29 : 808 - 817
  • [43] Simultaneous Heart-Kidney Transplant-Does Hospital Experience With Heart Transplant or Kidney Transplant Have a Greater Impact on Patient Outcomes?
    Catalano, Michael A.
    Pupovac, Stevan
    Jhaveri, Kenar D.
    Stevens, Gerin R.
    Hartman, Alan R.
    Yu, Pey-Jen
    TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2023, 36
  • [44] Higher Mortality in Pediatric Liver Transplant Candidates With Sarcopenia
    Boster, Julia M.
    Browne, Lorna P.
    Pan, Zhaoxing
    Zhou, Wenru
    Ehrlich, Peter F.
    Sundaram, Shikha S.
    LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2021, 27 (06) : 808 - 817
  • [45] Frailty Predicts Waitlist Mortality in Liver Transplant Candidates
    Lai, J. C.
    Feng, S.
    Terrault, N. A.
    Lizaola, B.
    Hayssen, H.
    Covinsky, K.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2014, 14 (08) : 1870 - 1879
  • [46] Longitudinal analysis of transplant candidates with primary sclerosing cholangitis in an Asian liver transplant center
    Yu, Ping-Jui
    Ho, Cheng-Maw
    Hsiao, Chih-Yang
    Wu, Yao-Ming
    Ho, Ming-Chih
    Lee, Po-Huang
    Hu, Rey-Heng
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2023, 35 (04) : 480 - 487
  • [47] Screening colonoscopy in liver transplant candidates: risks and findings
    Weismueller, Tobias J.
    Bleich, Florian
    Negm, Ahmed A.
    Schneider, Andrea
    Lankisch, Tim O.
    Manns, Michael P.
    Strassburg, Christian P.
    Wedemeyer, Jochen
    CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2013, 27 (02) : E161 - E168
  • [48] Psychosocial Risk Predicts New Episode Depression After Heart Transplant
    Schneekloth, Terry D.
    Hitschfeld, Mario J.
    Jowsey-Gregoire, Sheila G.
    Petterson, Tanya M.
    Dunlay, Shannon M.
    Niazi, Shehzad K.
    Vasquez, Adriana R.
    Rummans, Teresa A.
    PSYCHOSOMATICS, 2019, 60 (01) : 47 - 55
  • [49] Heart-kidney transplant versus heart transplant in the obese: a propensity-matched analysis
    Weingarten, Noah
    Iyengar, Amit
    Herbst, David Alan
    Helmers, Mark
    Rekhtman, David
    Song, Cindy
    Kim, Samuel T.
    Atluri, Pavan
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2022, 63 (01)
  • [50] Cardiovascular Screening and Management Among Kidney Transplant Candidates in Hungary
    Szabo, R. P.
    Varga, I.
    Balle, J.
    Zsom, L.
    Nemes, B.
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2015, 47 (07) : 2192 - 2195