Characterization of the stanford integrated psychosocial assessment for transplant for heart, liver, and kidney transplant candidates in Japan

被引:6
|
作者
Takano, Kosuke [1 ]
Oshibuchi, Hidehiro [1 ]
Kobayashi, Sayaka [1 ,2 ]
Tsutsui, Junko [1 ,3 ]
Ito, Satoko [1 ]
Kamba, Rumiko [1 ]
Akaho, Rie [1 ]
Nishimura, Katsuji [1 ]
机构
[1] Tokyo Womens Med Univ, Dept Psychiat, 8-1 Kawada Cho,Shinjuku Ku, Tokyo 1628666, Japan
[2] Saitama Med Univ, Saitama Med Ctr, Dept Psychiat, Saitama 1981, Kawagoe, Saitama 3508550, Japan
[3] Denen Chofu Univ, Fac Human Sci, 3-4-1 Higashiyurigaoka,Asao Ku, Kawasaki, Kanagawa 2158542, Japan
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
Organ-specific; Pre-transplant evaluation; Post-transplant outcomes; Psychosocial support; Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for transplantation; Transplant recipient; INTERRATER RELIABILITY; VERSION; SIPAT; PREDICTORS; SURVIVAL; VALIDITY;
D O I
10.1186/s13030-023-00281-6
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
BackgroundThe Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplantation (SIPAT) is a comprehensive psychosocial assessment proven useful for predicting the outcomes of organ transplantation that is expected to be useful in Japan. However, the characteristics of organ-specific SIPAT scores for organ transplant recipient candidates in Japan are unclear and, to date, the SIPAT has not been properly utilized in clinical practice. The purpose of this study was to present basic data that can be used to establish the relation between SIPAT scores and post-transplantation psychosocial outcomes as well as organ-specific outcomes.MethodsThis study included 167 transplant recipient candidates (25 heart, 71 liver, and 71 kidney) who completed a semi-structured interview based on the Japanese version of SIPAT (SIPAT-J) prior to transplantation. The differences between organs in terms of SIPAT scores and differences in SIPAT scores based on demographic data were comparatively analyzed.ResultsThe total SIPAT scores were higher for liver recipient candidates than for heart recipient candidates (P = .019). Regarding the subscales, SIPAT B (social support system) scores were higher for liver and kidney recipient candidates than for heart recipient candidates (P = .021), whereas SIPAT C (psychological stability and psychopathology) scores were higher for liver recipient candidates than for kidney recipient candidates (P = .002). Recipient candidates with a history of psychiatric treatment and those who were unemployed had higher SIPAT scores, regardless of the transplant organ, than recipient candidates without a history of psychiatric treatment and those who were employed (P < .001, P = .016, respectively).ConclusionsThere were notable differences in the total SIPAT-J and subscale scores among the liver, heart, and kidney recipient candidates. Each organ was associated with specific psychosocial issues that should be addressed before transplantation. Interventions such as information provision and patient education based on SIPAT assessment results for each organ may improve recipient post-transplant outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Renal outcomes of simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation compared to liver transplant alone for candidates with renal dysfunction
    Brennan, Todd V.
    Lunsford, Keri E.
    Vagefi, Parsia A.
    Bostrom, Alan
    Ma, Michael
    Feng, Sandy
    CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2015, 29 (01) : 34 - 43
  • [22] Outcomes after combined liver-kidney transplant vs. kidney transplant followed by liver transplant
    Chan, Edie Y.
    Bhattacharya, Renuka
    Eswaran, Sheila
    Hertl, Martin
    Shah, Nikunj
    Fayek, Sameh
    Cohen, Eric B.
    Hollinger, Edward F.
    Olaitan, Oyedolamu
    Jensik, Stephen C.
    Perkins, James D.
    CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2015, 29 (01) : 60 - 66
  • [23] An Emerging Population: Kidney Transplant Candidates Who Are Placed on the Waiting List after Liver, Heart, and Lung Transplantation
    Srinivas, Titte R.
    Stephany, Brian R.
    Budev, Marie
    Mason, David P.
    Starling, Randall C.
    Miller, Charles
    Goldfarb, David A.
    Flechner, Stuart M.
    Poggio, Emilio D.
    Schold, Jesse D.
    CLINICAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2010, 5 (10): : 1881 - 1886
  • [24] The Transplant Evaluation Rating Scale (TERS): A Tool for the Psychosocial Evaluation of Lung Transplant Candidates
    Zimmermann, Tanja
    Weusthoff, Sarah
    Beneke, Johannes
    Krueger, Jan Hendrik
    Tudorache, Igor
    Gottlieb, Jens
    de Zwaan, Martina
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PSYCHOSOMATISCHE MEDIZIN UND PSYCHOTHERAPIE, 2018, 64 (02): : 172 - 185
  • [25] Psychosocial Factors in Noncompliance During Liver Transplant Selection
    Harper, R. G.
    Wager, J.
    Chacko, R. C.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY IN MEDICAL SETTINGS, 2010, 17 (01) : 71 - 76
  • [26] Standardized Use of the Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplantation in LVAD Patients
    Cagliostro, Matthew
    Bromley, Andrew
    Ting, Peter
    Donehey, John
    Ferket, Bart
    Parks, Kira
    Palumbo, Elyse
    Mancini, Donna
    Anyanwu, Anelechi
    Pawale, Amit
    Pinney, Sean
    Moss, Noah
    Lala, Anuradha
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC FAILURE, 2019, 25 (09) : 735 - 743
  • [27] Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Access and Outcomes of Simultaneous Liver-Kidney Transplant Among Liver Transplant Candidates With Renal Dysfunction in the United States
    Chang, Su-Hsin
    Wang, Mei
    Liu, Xiaoyan
    Alhamad, Tarek
    Lentine, Krista L.
    Schnitzler, Mark A.
    Colditz, Graham A.
    Park, Yikyung
    Chapman, William C.
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2019, 103 (08) : 1663 - 1674
  • [28] Psychometric properties of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) in inpatient liver transplant candidates
    Szymkowicz, Sarah M.
    May, Pamela E.
    Weeks, Justin W.
    O'Connell, Debra
    Nelson Sheese, Amelia L.
    APPLIED NEUROPSYCHOLOGY-ADULT, 2024, 31 (01) : 19 - 26
  • [29] Marijuana Use in Potential Liver Transplant Candidates
    Ranney, D. N.
    Acker, W. B.
    Al-Holou, S. N.
    Ehrlichman, L.
    Lee, D. S.
    Lewin, S. A.
    Nguyen, C.
    Peterson, S. F.
    Sell, K.
    Kubus, J.
    Reid, D.
    Englesbe, M. J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2009, 9 (02) : 280 - 285
  • [30] The role of attachment and parental bonding in the psychosocial assessment of transplant candidates: a cross-sectional study
    Pistorio, Maria Luisa
    De Pasquale, Concetta
    Veroux, Massimiliano
    Bottesi, Gioia
    Granziol, Umberto
    Panzeri, Anna
    Giambra, Martina Maria
    Giaquinta, Alessia
    Veroux, Pierfrancesco
    BMC PSYCHOLOGY, 2025, 13 (01)