Linking cardiac and extracardiac sarcoidosis and their clinical outcome: 18F-FDG PET/CT analysis in patients with systemic cardiac sarcoidosis

ObjectiveTo clarify the link between cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) and extra-CS (ECS) in systemic CS (SCS) patients in terms of extent and clinical outcome by serial FDG-PET/CT.MethodsThirty-five SCS patients treated for > 2 years were enrolled in this study. In the overall analysis, patient-based comparisons of the complete resolution (CR) and recurrence rate between CS and ECS lesions were performed. Then, subgroup analyses were performed according to the extent (mono- vs. multi-organ ECS group) and clinical outcome (stable vs. unstable ECS group) of ECS. Pre-treatment cardiac FDG uptake was compared between the mono- and multi-organ ECS groups. The rates of CR, recurrence, and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were compared between the two groups.ResultsThe CR rate was significantly higher in CS than ECS lesions [77.1% (27/35) vs. 48.5% (17/35), p = 0.01], whereas recurrence rates were similar between CS and ECS [40.7% (11/27) vs. 58.8% (10/17)]. Both the mono- and multi-organ ECS groups showed similar SUVmax, cardiac metabolic volume, and cardiac metabolic activity in the pre-treatment condition. The CR rates were similar between the mono- and multi-organ ECS groups [71.4% (15/21) vs. 85.7% (12/14)], but the recurrence rate was significantly lower in the multi-organ ECS group [60.0% (9/15) vs. 16.7% (2/12), p = 0.02]. The CR [71.4% (5/7) vs. 78.6% (22/28)] and recurrence rates [60.0% (3/5) vs. 36.3% (8/22)] were not significantly different between the stable and unstable ECS groups. The occurrence of MACE was also not significantly different between the mono- and multi-organ ECS groups [19.0% (4/21) vs. 28.6% (4/14)] or between the stable and unstable ECS groups [42.9% (3/7) vs. 17.8% (5/28)].ConclusionsCS lesions respond to treatment better than ECS lesions, and the extent and clinical outcome of ECS lesion are not linked with those of CS lesions.