Introduction to the special section: "Methodologies and considerations for meaningful change"

被引：10
作者：
Trigg, Andrew [1 ]
Lenderking, William R. [2 ]
Boehnke, Jan R. [3 ]
机构：
[1] Bayer plc, Med Affairs Stat, Reading, England
[2] Evidera, Patient Ctr Res, Bethesda, MD USA
[3] Univ Dundee, Sch Hlth Sci, 11 Airlie Pl, Dundee DD1 4HJ, Scotland
来源：
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH | 2023年 / 32卷 / 05期
关键词：
MINIMAL IMPORTANT DIFFERENCE; INTERPRETING CHANGE; OUTCOMES;
D O I：
10.1007/s11136-023-03413-1
中图分类号：
R19 [保健组织与事业（卫生事业管理）];
学科分类号：
摘要：
引用
收藏
页码：1223 / 1230
页数：8
相关论文
共 52 条
  • [1] Comparison of raw and regression approaches to capturing change on patient-reported outcome measures
    Andrae, David A.
    Foster, Brandon
    Peipert, J. Devin
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2023, 32 (05) : 1381 - 1390
  • [2] [Anonymous], SISAQOL IMI IMI INNO
  • [3] "From Where I Stand": using multiple anchors yields different benchmarks for meaningful improvement and worsening in the rheumatoid arthritis flare questionnaire (RA-FQ)
    Bartlett, Susan J.
    Bykerk, Vivian P.
    Schieir, Orit
    Valois, Marie-France
    Pope, Janet E.
    Boire, Gilles
    Hitchon, Carol
    Hazlewood, Glen
    Bessette, Louis
    Keystone, Edward
    Thorne, Carter
    Tin, Diane
    Bingham, Clifton O., III
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2023, 32 (05) : 1307 - 1318
  • [4] Smallest real difference, a link between reproducibility and responsiveness
    Beckerman, H
    Roebroeck, ME
    Lankhorst, GJ
    Becher, JG
    Bezemer, PD
    Verbeek, ALM
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2001, 10 (07) : 571 - 578
  • [5] Important differences and meaningful changes for the functional assessment of cancer therapy-cognitive function (FACT-COG)
    Bell M.L.
    Dhillon H.M.
    Bray V.J.
    Vardy J.L.
    [J]. Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, 2 (1)
  • [6] Establishing thresholds for meaningful within-individual change using longitudinal item response theory
    Bjorner, Jakob Bue
    Terluin, Berend
    Trigg, Andrew
    Hu, Jinxiang
    Brady, Keri J. S.
    Griffiths, Pip
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2023, 32 (05) : 1267 - 1276
  • [7] Reliable change and the reliable change index: still useful after all these years?
    Blampied, Neville M. M.
    [J]. COGNITIVE BEHAVIOUR THERAPIST, 2022, 15
  • [8] ESMvis: a tool for visualizing individual Experience Sampling Method (ESM) data
    Bringmann, Laura F.
    van der Veen, Date C.
    Wichers, Marieke
    Riese, Harriette
    Stulp, Gert
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2021, 30 (11) : 3179 - 3188
  • [9] Evidence-based guidelines for interpreting change scores for the European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30
    Cocks, K.
    King, M. T.
    Velikova, G.
    de Castro, G., Jr.
    St-James, M. Martyn
    Fayers, P. M.
    Brown, J. M.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2012, 48 (11) : 1713 - 1721
  • [10] How scoring limits the usability of minimal important differences (MIDs) as responder definition (RD): an exemplary demonstration using EORTC QLQ-C30 subscales
    Cocks, Kim
    Buchanan, Jacqueline
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2023, 32 (05) : 1247 - 1253
123456