Can additional variables be used to predict stone-free rates following retrograde intrarenal surgery? Anticoagulants and parenchyma thickness: a detailed examination

被引:1
作者
Yildirim, Umit [1 ]
Ezer, Mehmet [1 ]
Uslu, Mehmet [1 ]
Guzel, Rasim [2 ]
Sarica, Kemal [3 ]
机构
[1] Kafkas Univ, Med Sch, Dept Urol, TR-36100 Merkez Kars, Turkiye
[2] Medistate Kavacik Hosp, Dept Urol, Istanbul, Turkiye
[3] Biruni Univ, Med Sch, Dept Urol, Istanbul, Turkiye
关键词
Kidney stones; Retrograde intrarenal surgery; Anticoagulants; Parenchymal thickness; FLEXIBLE URETEROSCOPY; LITHOTRIPSY; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1007/s00240-022-01404-4
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The purpose of this article is to identify the factors that predict the success of retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS), with a focus on the effect of renal parenchymal thickness and anticoagulant use on stone-free rates. From February 2014 to April 2022, cases of kidney stones treated with RIRS at our clinic were retrospectively screened. The study included 642 cases meeting all inclusion and exclusion criteria. The patients who were observed to be stone free after a single session of RIRS were assigned to Group F, while those with residual fragments were assigned to Group R. Group F comprised 472 patients, while Group R included 170 patients. The two groups have compared certain preoperative and postoperative laboratory and radiological parameters. The infundibulopelvic angle was significantly more acute in Group R (45.63 & PLUSMN; 16.25 vs. 49.28 & PLUSMN; 15.36, p = 0.011) while patients in Group F tended to have thicker parenchyma (27.39 & PLUSMN; 8.38 vs. 22.88 & PLUSMN; 5.56, p < 0.001). In our analysis of multivariate logistic regression, stone size (OR: 1.074, 1.037-1.113; p < 0.001), lower calyceal location (OR: 0.550, 95% CI 0.364-0.831; p = 0.005), multiple numbers of stones (OR 0.254, 95% CI 0.166-0.389; p = < 0.001), the value of parenchymal thickness (OR 0.911, 95% CI 0.882-0.941; p = < 0.001) and more importantly use of anticoagulants/antiplatelets (OR 0.557, 95% CI 0.333-0.933; p = 0.026) appeared to be independent predictors of stone-free status after RIRS. Further evaluation of the data revealed that the cut-off value of the renal parenchymal thickness for an effective stone-free status in a ROC curve analysis was 24.5 with 62.9% sensitivity and 56.8% specificity (area under curve value: 0.654 [95% CI 0.608-0.699, p < 0.001]). The endourologist may be able to make more informed decisions by evaluating renal parenchymal thickness in addition to patient-related factors like anticoagulant use, which we find significantly affects outcomes, along with the stone and renal anatomy-related factors.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [11] Development and internal validation of a nomogram for predicting stone-free status after flexible ureteroscopy for renal stones
    Ito, Hiroki
    Sakamaki, Kentaro
    Kawahara, Takashi
    Terao, Hideyuki
    Yasuda, Kengo
    Kuroda, Shinnosuke
    Yao, Masahiro
    Kubota, Yoshinobu
    Matsuzaki, Junichi
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 115 (03) : 446 - 451
  • [12] Modified Seoul National University Renal Stone Complexity score for retrograde intrarenal surgery
    Jung, Jin-Woo
    Lee, Byung Ki
    Park, Yong Hyun
    Lee, Sangchul
    Jeong, Seong Jin
    Lee, Sang Eun
    Jeong, Chang Wook
    [J]. UROLITHIASIS, 2014, 42 (04) : 335 - 340
  • [13] Kaplon DM, 2009, INT BRAZ J UROL, V35, P3
  • [14] Effects of Parenchymal Thickness and Stone Density Values on Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Outcomes
    Karalar, Mustafa
    Tuzel, Emre
    Keles, Ibrahim
    Okur, Nazan
    Sarici, Hasmet
    Ates, Mutlu
    [J]. MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR, 2016, 22 : 4363 - 4368
  • [15] Role of pelvicalyceal anatomy in the outcomes of retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for lower pole stones: outcomes with a systematic review of literature
    Karim, Sulaiman Sadaf
    Hanna, Luke
    Geraghty, Robert
    Somani, Bhaskar K.
    [J]. UROLITHIASIS, 2020, 48 (03) : 263 - 270
  • [16] Does the renal parenchymal thickness affect the efficacy of the retrograde intrarenal surgery? A prospective cohort study
    Koc, Erdem
    Kamaci, Davut
    Gok, Bahri
    Bedir, Fevzi
    Metin, Baki Can
    Atmaca, Ali Fuat
    [J]. UROLITHIASIS, 2021, 49 (01) : 57 - 64
  • [17] Treatment Outcomes of Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for Renal Stones and Predictive Factors of Stone-Free
    Lim, Soo Hyun
    Jeong, Byong Chang
    Seo, Seong Il
    Jeon, Seong Soo
    Han, Deok Hyun
    [J]. KOREAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 51 (11) : 777 - 782
  • [18] Single-use flexible ureteroscopes: Comparative in vitro analysis of four scopes
    Patil, Abhijit
    Agrawal, Shashank
    Batra, Rohan
    Singh, Abhishek
    Ganpule, Arvind
    Sabnis, Ravindra
    Desai, Mahesh
    [J]. ASIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2023, 10 : 64 - 69
  • [19] A New Scoring System for Predicting Stone-free Rate After Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery: The "Resorlu-Unsal Stone Score"
    Resorlu, Berkan
    Unsal, Ali
    Gulec, Handan
    Oztuna, Derya
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2012, 80 (03) : 512 - 517
  • [20] Periprocedural Management of Oral Anticoagulation
    Shaw, Joseph R.
    Kaplovitch, Eric
    Douketis, James
    [J]. MEDICAL CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2020, 104 (04) : 709 - +