Tail risk dependence, co-movement and predictability between green bond and green stocks

被引:40
作者
Tiwari, Aviral Kumar [1 ]
Abakah, Emmanuel Joel Aikins [2 ]
Yaya, OlaOluwa Simon [3 ,4 ]
Appiah, Kingsley Opoku [5 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Management Bodh Gaya, Econ & Business Environm, Bodh Gaya, India
[2] Univ Ghana, Business Sch, Accra, Ghana
[3] Univ Ibadan, Dept Stat, Econ & Financial Stat Unit, Ibadan, Nigeria
[4] Univ Ibadan, Ctr Econometr & Allied Res, Ibadan, Nigeria
[5] Kwame Nkrumah Univ Sci & Technol, Business Sch, Kumasi, Ghana
关键词
Green bond; environmental securities; cross-Quantilogram correlation; wavelets scalogram; FREQUENCY CONNECTEDNESS; QUANTILE DEPENDENCE; POLICY UNCERTAINTY; TIME; COVID-19; PRICES;
D O I
10.1080/00036846.2022.2085869
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper examines the coherence of extreme returns between green bonds and a unique set of green stocks. We use the novel quantile cross-spectral coherence methodology of quantile spectral coherency model, cross-quantilogram correlation approach, windowed time-lagged cross-correlation, and windowed scalogram difference models as estimation techniques. The study period spans from 28 November 2008 to 23 September 2020. Our measure of green stocks comprises the constituents of the MSCI Global Environment Price Index: Alternative Energy, Green Building, Pollution Prevention or Clean Technology while our green bond market is proxied by S&P Green Bond Index. We find the dependency between Green Bonds and green stocks to be weak, and this is high during market downturn periods in the short- to medium-term dynamics. This suggests that Green Bonds do act as a hedge, diversifier, or safe-haven instrument for environment portfolio in the short-term, medium-term and long-term dynamics during bearish market conditions. We conclude that green bonds and green stocks are two distinct asset classes with a distinct risk-return profile despite their common climate-friendly nature.
引用
收藏
页码:201 / 222
页数:22
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   Re-examination of international bond market dependence: Evidence from a pair copula approach [J].
Abakah, Emmanuel Joel Aikins ;
Addo, Emmanuel, Jr. ;
Gil-Alana, Luis A. ;
Tiwari, Aviral Kumar .
INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF FINANCIAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 74
[2]  
Amihud Y., 2006, FDN TRENDS FINANCE, V1, P269, DOI DOI 10.1561/0500000003
[3]   COVID-19 and time-frequency connectedness between green and conventional financial markets [J].
Arif, Muhammad ;
Hasan, Mudassar ;
Alawi, Suha M. ;
Naeem, Muhammad Abubakr .
GLOBAL FINANCE JOURNAL, 2021, 49
[4]   Quantile coherency: A general measure for dependence between cyclical economic variables [J].
Barunik, Jozef ;
Kley, Tobias .
ECONOMETRICS JOURNAL, 2019, 22 (02) :131-+
[5]   The windowed scalogram difference: A novel wavelet tool for comparing time series [J].
Bolos, V. J. ;
Benitez, R. ;
Ferrer, R. ;
Jammazi, R. .
APPLIED MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTATION, 2017, 312 :49-65
[6]  
Climate Bonds Initiative, 2019, GREEN BOND MARK SUMM
[7]   DISTRIBUTION OF THE ESTIMATORS FOR AUTOREGRESSIVE TIME-SERIES WITH A UNIT ROOT [J].
DICKEY, DA ;
FULLER, WA .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1979, 74 (366) :427-431
[8]   Better to give than to receive: Predictive directional measurement of volatility spillovers [J].
Diebold, Francis X. ;
Yilmaz, Kamil .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FORECASTING, 2012, 28 (01) :57-66
[9]   Copulas in Econometrics [J].
Fan, Yanqin ;
Patton, Andrew J. .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS, VOL 6, 2014, 6 :179-200
[10]   The impact of liquidity risk on the yield spread of green bonds [J].
Febi, Wulandari ;
Schafer, Dorothea ;
Stephan, Andreas ;
Sun, Chen .
FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2018, 27 :53-59