Understanding the Ecosystem of Enterprise Risk Governance

被引:5
作者
Beasley, Mark S. [1 ]
Branson, Bruce C. [1 ]
Braumann, Evelyn C. [2 ]
Pagach, Donald P. [1 ]
机构
[1] North Carolina State Univ, Poole Coll Management, Dept Accounting, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
[2] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Sch Business & Econ, Dept Accounting, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
risk governance; enterprise risk management; board oversight; strategic risk management; METHOD BIAS; MANAGEMENT; DETERMINANTS; SCIENCE; CULTURE; SYSTEMS; MODELS; PERFORMANCE; QUALITY; DESIGN;
D O I
10.2308/TAR-2020-0488
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Approaches to risk governance are not homogeneous across organizations. Some organizations invest heavily in building formal and strategically focused enterprise-wide risk governance processes whereas others exhibit reduced formality and focus, allowing risk governance to be less structured. We argue that risk governance may best be described as a service dependent upon a network (or ecosystem) of participants who include users of risk information and providers who design and implement risk governance processes. Using a survey sample of 2,380 observations from 2011 to 2016, we find that external calls for enhanced risk governance are positively associated with risk governance processes having greater formality and strategic focus. We find this relationship is partially mediated by internal demands for enhanced risk governance. Further, we find that the positive association between internal demands and enhanced risk governance is reduced by resource constraints and that a risk-seeking attitude is negatively associated with enhanced risk governance.
引用
收藏
页码:99 / 128
页数:30
相关论文
共 116 条
[91]  
Powell WalterW., 1991, NEW I ORG ANAL, P183, DOI DOI 10.7208/CHICAGO/9780226185941.001.0001
[92]  
Power M., 2007, ORG UNCERTAINTY
[93]   The risk management of nothing [J].
Power, Michael .
ACCOUNTING ORGANIZATIONS AND SOCIETY, 2009, 34 (6-7) :849-855
[94]  
Protiviti/ and North Carolina State University, 2021, Executive Perspectives on Top Risks for 2022 and 2031
[95]   Dynamic risk management [J].
Rampini, Adriano A. ;
Sufi, Amir ;
Viswanathan, S. .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2014, 111 (02) :271-296
[96]  
Rittenberg L., 2012, Understanding and communicating risk appetite
[97]   What Drives Business Model Adaptation? The Impact of Opportunities, Threats and Strategic Orientation [J].
Saebi, Tina ;
Lien, Lasse ;
Foss, Nicolai J. .
LONG RANGE PLANNING, 2017, 50 (05) :567-581
[98]  
Sampson SE, 2006, PROD OPER MANAG, V15, P329, DOI 10.1111/j.1937-5956.2006.tb00248.x
[99]   Stakeholder pressure as a driver of risk management practices in public administrations [J].
Schaefer, Fabienne-Sophie ;
Hirsch, Bernhard ;
Nitzl, Christian .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING AND ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE, 2022, 18 (01) :33-56
[100]  
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), 2010, SEC Rule Release No. 33-9089-Proxy Disclosure Enhancements