Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version of the Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-Carer

被引:0
作者
Lee, Juhee [1 ]
Sohn, Young H. [2 ]
Chung, Seok Jong [2 ,3 ]
Kim, Sung Hae [4 ]
Suh, Yujin [5 ]
Park, Jungah [6 ]
Kim, Yielin [7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Yonsei Univ, Joanna Briggs Inst Excellence, Yonsei Evidence Based Nursing Ctr Korea, Mo Im Kim Nursing Res Inst,Coll Nursing, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Dept Neurol, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Yonsei Univ Hlth Syst, Yongin Severance Hosp, Dept Neurol, Yongin, South Korea
[4] Tongmyong Univ, Dept Nursing, Busan, South Korea
[5] Dong Eui Univ, Coll Nursing Hlth Sci & Human Ecol, Busan, South Korea
[6] CHA Univ, Coll Nursing, Pochon, South Korea
[7] Yonsei Univ Hlth Syst, Severance Hosp, Div Nursing, Seoul, South Korea
[8] Yonsei Univ Hlth Syst, Severance Hosp, Div Nursing, 50-1 Yonsei Ro, Seoul 03722, South Korea
来源
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROLOGY | 2023年 / 19卷 / 06期
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Correspondence; Keywords Parkinson's disease; carers; translations; reliability; validity; CAREGIVER; TRANSLATION; VALIDATION; BURDEN; NEEDS;
D O I
10.3988/jcn.2022.0390
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Purpose The importance of the quality of life (QOL) of carers has been increasingly recognized as it has a wide range of effects on the psychological, emotional, and social outcomes of patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). Understanding their QOL is impor-tant as it reflects their unique characteristics; however, there have been few studies on this in Korea. This study aimed to translate and validate the Korean version of the Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-Carer (PDQ-Carer).Methods This was a methodological study that included a translation process and a cross-sectional investigation. The Korean version of the scale was developed using back translation, semantic adjustment, and pretests. The final version was self-administered by 125 Korean family carers. Cronbach's alpha values were used to assess the internal consistency of the PDQ-Carer. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were used to validate the translat-ed scale.Results Exploratory factor analysis identified four factors that accounted for 64.51% of the variance. A modified model using modification indices was found to fit the data well in the confirmatory factor analysis. That factor analysis supported the structure of the original four factors with relocation of several items that reflected Korean culture. Cronbach's alpha values were 0.96 for the total scale, 0.93 for personal and social activities, 0.89 for strain, 0.85 for anx-iety and depression, and 0.85 for self-care.Conclusions This study verified that the Korean version of the PDQ-Carer can be used to ac-quire important information about the multidimensional aspects of the QOL of Korean carers for patients with PD.
引用
收藏
页码:547 / 557
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Reliability, Validity, and Responsiveness of the Korean Version of the Shoulder Disability Questionnaire and Shoulder Rating Questionnaire
    Choi, Yuseong
    Park, Jong Wook
    Noh, Sujin
    Kim, Min Su
    Park, Yun Hee
    Sung, Duk Hyun
    ANNALS OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE-ARM, 2015, 39 (05): : 705 - 717
  • [42] Validity and reliability of Persian version of chronic liver disease questionnaire (CLDQ)
    Mahmoudi, Hilda
    Jafari, Peyman
    Alizadeh-Naini, Mahvash
    Gholami, Siyavash
    Malek-Hosseini, Seyed Ali
    Ghaffaripour, Sina
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2012, 21 (08) : 1479 - 1485
  • [43] Reliability, Validity, and Cross-Cultural Adaptation of the Turkish Version of the Bournemouth Questionnaire
    Gunaydin, Gurkan
    Citaker, Seyit
    Meray, Jale
    Cobanoglu, Gamze
    Gunaydin, Ozge Ece
    Kanik, Zeynep Hazar
    SPINE, 2016, 41 (21) : E1292 - E1297
  • [44] Assessment of voiding dysfunction in Parkinson's disease: Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Danish Prostate Symptom Score
    Akkoc, Yesim
    Gok, Haydar
    Karapolat, Hale
    Ersoz, Murat
    Sungur, Ulas
    Koklu, Kurtulus
    Alemdaroglu, Ebru
    Tunc, Hakan
    Acarer, Ahmet
    Ozer, Inci Sule
    Akbostanci, Cenk
    Arli, Berna
    Yoldas, Tahir Kurtulus
    NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, 2017, 36 (07) : 1903 - 1909
  • [45] Reliability and Validity of the Arabic Version of the Game Experience Questionnaire: Pilot Questionnaire Study
    Rebhi, Mahmoud
    Ben Aissa, Mohamed
    Tannoubi, Amayra
    Saidane, Mouna
    Guelmami, Noomen
    Puce, Luca
    Chen, Wen
    Chalghaf, Nasr
    Azaiez, Fairouz
    Zghibi, Makrem
    Bragazzi, Nicola Luigi
    JMIR FORMATIVE RESEARCH, 2023, 7
  • [46] Validity and reliability of an adapted arabic version of the long international physical activity questionnaire
    Helou, Khalil
    El Helou, Nour
    Mahfouz, Maya
    Mahfouz, Yara
    Salameh, Pascale
    Harmouche-Karaki, Mireille
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2017, 18
  • [47] The Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version of the Developmental Snapshot
    Pae, Soyeong
    Yoon, Hyojin
    Seol, Ahyoung
    Gilkerson, Jill
    COMMUNICATION SCIENCES AND DISORDERS-CSD, 2015, 20 (03): : 355 - 363
  • [48] Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of the Fremantle Back Awareness Questionnaire
    Erol, Erkan
    Yildiz, Ayse
    Yildiz, Ramazan
    Apaydin, Umut
    Gokmen, Derya
    Elbasan, Bulent
    SPINE, 2019, 44 (09) : E549 - E554
  • [49] Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of the Acute Stroke Management Questionnaire
    Adadioglu, Oeznur
    Acar, Bilgehan Atilgan
    Acar, Tuerkan
    BRAIN AND BEHAVIOR, 2024, 14 (12):
  • [50] Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Emotion Regulation Skills Questionnaire
    Fujisato, Hiroko
    Ito, Masaya
    Takebayashi, Yoshitake
    Hosogoshi, Hiroki
    Kato, Noriko
    Nakajima, Shun
    Miyamae, Mitsuhiro
    Oe, Yuki
    Usami, Satoshi
    Kanie, Ayako
    Horikoshi, Masaru
    Berking, Matthias
    JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2017, 208 : 145 - 152