Frequency of Prenatal Care Visits: Protocol to Develop a Core Outcome Set for Prenatal Care Schedules

被引:1
作者
Turrentine, Mark [1 ]
Nguyen, Buu-Hac [2 ]
Choby, Beth [3 ,4 ]
Kendig, Susan [5 ]
King, Tekoa L. [6 ]
Kotelchuck, Milton [7 ]
Simas, Tiffany A. Moore [8 ,9 ,10 ,11 ]
Srinivas, Sindhu K. [12 ]
Zahn, Christopher M. [13 ]
Peahl, Alex Friedman [14 ]
机构
[1] Baylor Coll Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Houston, TX USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Coll Literature Sci & Arts, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[3] Univ Tennessee, Dept Med Educ, Coll Med, Memphis, TN USA
[4] Baptist Hlth Sci Univ, Baptist Univ, Coll Osteopath Med, Memphis, TN USA
[5] SSM Hlth St Louis Region, Maternal Serv, Shiloh, IL USA
[6] Univ Calif San Francisco, San Francisco Sch Nursing, Dept Family Hlth Care Nursing, San Francisco, CA USA
[7] Harvard Med Sch, Dept Pediat, Boston, MA USA
[8] Univ Massachusetts, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Sch Med, Worcester, MA USA
[9] Univ Massachusetts, Dept Pediat, Sch Med, Worcester, MA USA
[10] Univ Massachusetts, Dept Psychiat, Sch Med, Worcester, MA USA
[11] Univ Massachusetts, Dept Populat & Quantitat Hlth Sci, Sch Med, Worcester, MA USA
[12] Penn Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Philadelphia, PA USA
[13] Amer Coll Obstetricians & Gynecologists, Clin Practice & Hlth Equ & Qual, Washington, DC USA
[14] Univ Michigan, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Ann Arbor, MI USA
来源
JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS | 2023年 / 12卷
关键词
core outcome set; Delphi; prenatal care schedules; telemedicine; prenatal; pediatric; maternal; obstetric; core outcome; pregnant; pregnancy; care delivery; care schedule; infant; review method; systematic review;
D O I
10.2196/43962
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Prenatal care, one of the most common preventive care services in the United States, endeavors to improve pregnancy outcomes through evidence-based screenings and interventions. Despite the prevalence of prenatal care and its importance to maternal and infant health, there are several debates about the best methods of prenatal care delivery, including the most appropriate schedule frequency and content of prenatal visits. Current US national guidelines recommend that low-risk individuals receive a standard schedule of 12 to 14 in-office visits, a care delivery model that has remained unchanged for almost a century. Objective: In early 2020, to mitigate individuals' exposure to the SARS-CoV-2 virus, prenatal care providers implemented new paradigms that altered the schedule frequency, interval, and modality (eg, telemedicine) of how prenatal care services were offered. In this paper, we describe the development of a core outcome set (COS) that can be used to evaluate the effect of the frequency of prenatal care schedules on maternal and infant outcomes. Methods: We will systematically review the literature to identify previously reported outcomes important to individuals who receive prenatal care and the people who care for them. Stakeholders with expertise in prenatal care delivery (ie, patients or family members, health care providers, and public health professionals and policy makers) will rate the importance of identified outcomes in a web-based survey using a 3-round Delphi process. A digital consensus meeting will be held for a group of stakeholder representatives to discuss and vote on the outcomes to include in the final COS. Results: The Delphi survey was initiated in July 2022 with invited 71 stakeholders. A digital consensus conference was conducted on October 11, 2022. Data are currently under analysis with plans to submit them in a subsequent manuscript. Conclusions: More research about the optimal schedule frequency and modality for prenatal care delivery is needed. Standardizing outcomes that are measured and reported in evaluations of the recommended prenatal care schedules will assist evidence synthesis and results reported in systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Overall, this COS will expand the consistency and patient-centeredness of reported outcomes for various prenatal care delivery schedules and modalities, hopefully improving the overall efficacy of recommended care delivery for pregnant people and their families. International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/43962 (JMIR Res Protoc 2023;12:e43962) doi: 10.2196/43962
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] Balk E M., 2022, Schedule of Visits and Televisits for Routine Antenatal Care: A Systematic Review
  • [2] A Review of Prenatal Care Delivery to Inform the Michigan Plan for Appropriate Tailored Healthcare in Pregnancy Panel
    Barrera, Chloe M.
    Powell, Allison R.
    Biermann, Chloe Ramirez
    Siden, Jonathan Y.
    Buu-Hac Nguyen
    Roberts, Suni Jo
    James, LaTeesa
    Chopra, Vineet
    Peahl, Alex
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2021, 138 (04) : 603 - 615
  • [3] Dowswell Therese, 2015, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, pCD000934, DOI [10.1002/14651858.CD000934.pub2, 10.1002/14651858.CD000934.pub3]
  • [4] Guyatt GH, 2011, J CLIN EPIDEMIOL, V64, P1311, DOI [10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.03.017, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.06.004]
  • [5] Important research outcomes for treatment studies of perinatal depression: systematic overview and development of a core outcome set
    Hellberg, C.
    Osterberg, M.
    Jonsson, A. K.
    Fundell, S.
    Tronnberg, F.
    Jonsson, M.
    Skalkidou, A.
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2021, 128 (13) : 2141 - 2149
  • [6] Higgins JP., 2008, Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, DOI [10.1002/9780470712184, DOI 10.1002/9780470712184]
  • [7] Kilpatrick S, 2017, Guidelines for Perinatal Care. 8 Edn
  • [8] Core Outcome Set-STAndardised Protocol Items: the COS-STAP Statement
    Kirkham, Jamie J.
    Gorst, Sarah
    Altman, Douglas G.
    Blazeby, Jane M.
    Clarke, Mike
    Tunis, Sean
    Williamson, Paula R.
    Aldcroft, Adrian
    Bagley, Heather
    Connolly, Bronwen
    Gorst, Sarah
    Kirkham, Jamie J.
    Li, Tianjing
    Matvienko-Sikar, Karen
    Thomas, Victoria
    Tunis, Sean
    Williamson, Paula R.
    [J]. TRIALS, 2019, 20 (1)
  • [9] Core Outcome Set-STAndards for Development: The COS-STAD recommendations
    Kirkham, Jamie J.
    Davis, Katherine
    Altman, Douglas G.
    Blazeby, Jane M.
    Clarke, Mike
    Tunis, Sean
    Williamson, Paula R.
    [J]. PLOS MEDICINE, 2017, 14 (11):
  • [10] How Long Is Too Long in Contemporary Peer Review? Perspectives from Authors Publishing in Conservation Biology Journals
    Nguyen, Vivian M.
    Haddaway, Neal R.
    Gutowsky, Lee F. G.
    Wilson, Alexander D. M.
    Gallagher, Austin J.
    Donaldson, Michael R.
    Hammerschlag, Neil
    Cooke, Steven J.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (08):