Using Policy Briefs to Communicate Dental Research Findings to Policymakers

Objectives: New scientific knowledge is not always available to decision makers. Policy briefs are a way that dental researchers can communicate research findings to policymakers. This study compares usefulness of 2 types of policy briefs about sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) intake and tooth decay. Methods: We developed 2 policy brief types (data focused and narrative focused) and emailed a randomly assigned policy brief to 825 policymakers and staff from 3 levels of government (city, county, and state) in Washington State. Participants completed a 22-item online questionnaire. There were 4 study outcomes: whether the brief was understandable, whether the brief was credible, likelihood of use, and likelihood to be shared (each measured on a 5-point Likert-like scale). The t test was used to evaluate whether outcomes differed by policy brief type and government level (alpha = 0.05). Results: There were 108 respondents (adjusted response rate 14.6%). About 41.6% of participants were in city government, 26.9% were in county government, and 29.6% were in state government. Participants reported that both data- and narrative-focused briefs were understandable (mean rating [MR] and standard deviation [SD]: 4.15 +/- 0.68 and 4.09 +/- 0.81, respectively; P = 0.65) and credible (MR and SD: 4.13 +/- 0.70 and 4.09 +/- 0.70, respectively; P = 0.74), but they were not likely to use (MR and SD: 2.71 +/- 1.15 and 2.55 +/- 1.28, respectively; P = 0.51) or share it (MR and SD: 2.62 +/- 1.04 and 2.66 +/- 1.30, respectively; P = 0.87). The likelihood of sharing briefs differed significantly by level of government (P = 0.017). Participants at the state level were more likely to share information from the briefs (mean rating and SD: 3.10 +/- 0.80) than city- and county-level participants (MR and SD: 2.62 +/- 1.27, and 2.24 +/- 1.21, respectively). Conclusion: Both data- and narrative-focused policy briefs may be a useful way to communicate dental research findings to policymakers, but additional steps are needed to ensure that briefs are used and shared. Knowledge Transfer Statement: Researchers should disseminate their research findings to maximize scientific impact. Our study findings indicate that policy briefs may be a useful way to communicate dental research findings to policymakers, but additional research is needed on the best ways to disseminate findings.