External Validation of a Prediction Model Assessing Risk of Delivery in Fetuses with Growth Restriction after Diagnosis of Abnormal Umbilical Artery Doppler

被引:0
|
作者
Yu, Hope Y. Y. [1 ,5 ]
Wang, Wei [2 ]
Benson, Carol B. [3 ]
Doubilet, Peter [3 ]
Rouse, Dwight J. [4 ]
Little, Sarah E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Med Sch, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Boston, MA USA
[2] Harvard Med Sch, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Med, Boston, MA USA
[3] Harvard Med Sch, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Radiol, Boston, MA USA
[4] Women & Infants Hosp Rhode Isl, Warren Alpert Med Sch, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Providence, RI USA
[5] Harvard Med Sch, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Obstetr & Gynecol, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
fetal growth restriction; prediction model; abnormal umbilical artery Doppler; antenatal corticosteroids; BIRTH;
D O I
10.1055/a-2081-2767
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective We have previously described a model using maternal, antenatal, and ultrasonographic characteristics to assess the risk of delivery within 7 days following diagnosis of abnormal umbilical artery Doppler (UAD) in pregnancies affected by fetal growth restriction (FGR). Therefore, we sought to validate this model in an independent cohort.Study Design Retrospective, single referral center study of liveborn singleton pregnancies from 2016 to 2019 complicated by FGR and abnormal UAD (systolic/diastolic ratio >= 95th percentile for gestational age [GA]). Prediction probabilities were calculated by applying the original model (Model 1) to the current cohort (Brigham and Women's Hospital [BWH] cohort). The variables of this model include GA at first abnormal UAD, severity of first abnormal UAD, oligohydramnios, preeclampsia, and prepregnancy body mass index. Model fit was assessed with area under the curve (AUC). Two alternative models (Models 2 and 3) were created to identify a model with better predictive characteristics than Model 1. The receiver operating characteristics curves were compared using the DeLong test.Results A total of 306 patients were assessed for eligibility, 223 of whom were included in the BWH cohort. Median GA at eligibility was 31.3 weeks, and median interval from eligibility to delivery was 17 days (interquartile range: 3.5-33.5). Eighty-two (37%) patients delivered within 7 days of eligibility. Applying Model 1 to the BWH cohort resulted in an AUC of 0.865. Using the previously determined probability cutoff of 0.493, the model was 62% sensitive and 90% specific in predicting the primary outcome in this independent cohort. Models 2 and 3 did not perform better than Model 1 ( p = 0.459).Conclusion A previously described prediction model to predict risk of delivery in patients with FGR and abnormal UAD performed well in an independent cohort. With high specificity, this model could assist in identifying low-risk patients and improve antenatal corticosteroid timing.
引用
收藏
页码:e1824 / e1829
页数:6
相关论文
共 14 条
  • [1] Prediction Model Assessing Risk of Delivery after Diagnosis of Abnormal Umbilical Artery Doppler
    Yu, Hope Y.
    Has, Phinnara
    Danilack, Valery A.
    Werner, Erika F.
    Rouse, Dwight J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2023, 40 (11) : 1253 - 1258
  • [2] Role of the fetoplacental endothelium in fetal growth restriction with abnormal umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry
    Su, Emily J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 213 (04) : S123 - S130
  • [3] Rate of deterioration of umbilical artery Doppler indices in fetuses with severe early-onset fetal growth restriction
    Martins, Juliana Gevaerd
    Kawakita, Tetsuya
    Barake, Carole
    Gould, Lindsay
    Baraki, Dana
    Connell, Phillip
    Sinkovskaya, Elena
    Abuhamad, Alfred
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY MFM, 2024, 6 (03)
  • [4] Outcome of early-onset fetal growth restriction with or without abnormal umbilical artery Doppler flow
    Gairabekova, Diana
    van Rosmalen, Joost
    Duvekot, Johannes J.
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2021, 100 (08) : 1430 - 1438
  • [5] A Comparison of Fetal Outcome in Pregnant Women with Fetal Growth Restriction in Normal & Abnormal Umbilical Artery Doppler
    Akram, Humaira
    Firdous, Tabassum
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL & HEALTH SCIENCES, 2013, 7 (04): : 1063 - 1065
  • [6] Fetoplacental biometry and umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry in the overnourished adolescent model of fetal growth restriction
    Carr, David J.
    Aitken, Raymond P.
    Milne, John S.
    David, Anna L.
    Wallace, Jacqueline M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2012, 207 (02) : 141.e6 - 141.e15
  • [7] Prognostic significance of the interaction between abnormal umbilical and middle cerebral artery Doppler velocimetry in pregnancies complicated by fetal growth restriction
    Spinillo, Arsenio
    Montanari, Laura
    Roccio, Marianna
    Zanchi, Silvia
    Tzialla, Chryssoula
    Stronati, Mauro
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2009, 88 (02) : 159 - 166
  • [8] Maternal plasma soluble neuropilin-1 is downregulated in fetal growth restriction complicated by abnormal umbilical artery Doppler: a pilot study
    Porter, B.
    Maulik, D.
    Babbar, S.
    Schrufer-Poland, T.
    Allsworth, J.
    Ye, S. Q.
    Heruth, D. P.
    Lei, T.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2021, 58 (05) : 716 - 721
  • [9] Doppler ultrasound of umbilical and middle cerebral artery in third trimester small-for-gestational age fetuses to decide on timing of delivery for suspected fetal growth restriction: A cohort with nested RCT (DRIGITAT)
    Marijnen, Mauritia C.
    Kamphof, Hester D.
    Damhuis, Stefanie E.
    Smies, Maddy
    Leemhuis, Aleid G.
    Wolf, Hans
    Gordijn, Sanne J.
    Ganzevoort, Wessel
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2024, 131 (08) : 1042 - 1053
  • [10] Development and Validation of a Risk Prediction Model for Cesarean Delivery After Labor Induction
    Danilack, Valery A.
    Hutcheon, Jennifer A.
    Triche, Elizabeth W.
    Dore, David D.
    Muri, Janet H.
    Phipps, Maureen G.
    Savitz, David A.
    JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH, 2020, 29 (05) : 656 - 669