Stratifying ASD and characterizing the functional connectivity of subtypes in resting-state fMRI

Background: Although stratifying autism spectrum disorder (ASD) into different subtypes is a common effort in the research field, few papers have characterized the functional connectivity alterations of ASD subgroups classified by their clinical presentations. Methods: This is a case-control rs-fMRI study, based on large samples of open database (Autism Brain Imaging Data Exchange, ABIDE). The rs-MRI data from n = 415 ASD patients (males n = 357), and n = 574 typical development (TD) controls (males n = 410) were included. Clinical features of ASD were extracted and classified using data from each patient's Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised (ADI-R) evaluation. Each subtype of ASD was characterized by local functional connectivity using regional homogeneity (ReHo) for assessment, remote functional connectivity using voxel-mirrored homotopic connectivity (VMHC) for assessment, the whole-brain functional connectivity, and graph theoretical features. These identified imaging properties from each subtype were integrated to create a machine learning model for classifying ASD patients into the subtypes based on their rs-fMRI data, and an independent dataset was used to validate the model. Results: All ASD participants were classified into Cluster-1 (patients with more severe impairment) and Cluster-2 (patients with moderate impairment) according to the dimensional scores of ADI-R. When compared to the TD group, Cluster-1 demonstrated increased local connection and decreased remote connectivity, and widespread hyper-and hypo-connectivity variations in the whole-brain functional connectivity. Cluster-2 was quite similar to the TD group in both local and remote connectivity. But at the level of whole-brain functional connectivity, the MCC-related connections were specifically impaired in Cluster-2. These properties of functional connectivity were fused to build a machine learning model, which achieved similar to 75% for identifying ASD subtypes (Cluster-1 accuracy = 81.75%; Cluster-2 accuracy = 76.48%). Conclusions: The stratification of ASD by clinical presentations can help to minimize disease heterogeneity and highlight the distinguished properties of brain connectivity in ASD subtypes.