Does crural repair with biosynthetic mesh improve outcomes of revisional surgery for recurrent hiatal hernia?

被引:2
|
作者
Tonucci, T. Panici [1 ]
Aiolfi, A. [2 ]
Bona, D. [2 ]
Bonavina, L. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Milan, Dept Biomed Sci Hlth, Div Gen & Foregut Surg, IRCCS Policlin San Donato, Via Piercandido Decembrio 19-A, I-20137 Milan, Italy
[2] Univ Milan, Dept Biomed Sci Hlth, Div Gen Surg, IRCCS Osped Galeazzi St Ambrogio, Milan, Italy
关键词
Hiatus hernia; Recurrent hiatal hernia; Crural repair; Failed fundoplication; Biosynthetic mesh; GERD-HRQL score; FAILED ANTIREFLUX SURGERY; LAPAROSCOPIC REOPERATION; FUNDOPLICATION; REINFORCEMENT; COMPLICATIONS; CLOSURE;
D O I
10.1007/s10029-024-03023-x
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Laparoscopic revisional surgery for recurrent hiatal hernia (HH) is technically demanding. Re-recurrences are common and esophageal hiatus mesh reinforcement might improve durability of the repair, thus minimizing the risk of re-herniation. Purpose Assess safety and effectiveness of simple suture repair (no mesh group) vs. crural augmentation with a biosynthetic absorbable mesh (mesh group) in patients with recurrent HH. Methods Observational retrospective study from September 2012 to December 2022. Only patients undergoing redo surgery for previous failures of hiatal hernia repair were enrolled. Surgical failure was defined as symptomatic recurrent HH with > 2 cm of gastric tissue above the diaphragmatic impression at upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and/or swallow study. Gastro-Esophageal Reflux Disease Health-Related Quality of Life (GERD-HRQL) and Short Form-36 (SF-36) questionnaires were used to assess and preoperative and postoperative symptoms and quality of life. Results One hundred four patients were included. Overall, 60 patients (57.7%) underwent mesh-reinforced cruroplasty, whereas 44 (42.3%) underwent simple suture cruroplasty. Mesh and no mesh groups had similar baseline demographics, symptoms, prevalence of esophagitis and Barrett's esophagus, and HH size. A composite crural repair was most commonly performed in the mesh group (38.3% vs. 20.5%; p = 0.07). In addition to cruroplasty, most patients (91%) underwent a Toupet fundoplication. The 90-day postoperative complication rate was 8.6%, and there was no mortality. Recurrent HH was diagnosed in 21 patients (20.2%) with a clinical trend toward reduced incidence in the mesh group (16.7% vs. 25%; p = 0.06). Compared to baseline, there was a statistically significant improvement of median GERD-HRQL score (p < 0.01) and all SF-36 items (p < 0.01). Conclusions Laparoscopic revisional surgery for recurrent HH is safe and effective. Selective use of biosynthetic mesh may protect from early recurrence and has the potential to reduce re-herniation in the long-term.
引用
收藏
页码:1687 / 1695
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Resorbable Biosynthetic Mesh for Crural Reinforcement during Hiatal Hernia Repair
    Alicuben, Evan T.
    Worrell, Stephanie G.
    Demeester, Steven R.
    AMERICAN SURGEON, 2014, 80 (10) : 1030 - 1033
  • [2] Outcomes Following Laparoscopic Hiatal Hernia Repair With Mesh: A Comparison of Biologic and Biosynthetic Mesh
    Patel, Lava Y.
    Gitelis, Matthew E.
    Linn, John G.
    Haggerty, Stephen P.
    Denham, Woody
    Ujiki, Michael
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2016, 150 (04) : S1208 - S1208
  • [3] Hiatal hernia repair with biosynthetic mesh reinforcement: a qualitative systematic review
    Lima, Diego L.
    de Figueiredo, Sergio Mazzola Poli
    Pereira, Xavier
    Murillo, Felipe R.
    Sreeramoju, Prashanth
    Malcher, Flavio
    Damani, Tanuja
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2023, 37 (10): : 7425 - 7436
  • [4] Hiatal hernia repair with biosynthetic mesh reinforcement: a qualitative systematic review
    Diego L. Lima
    Sergio Mazzola Poli de Figueiredo
    Xavier Pereira
    Felipe R. Murillo
    Prashanth Sreeramoju
    Flavio Malcher
    Tanuja Damani
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2023, 37 : 7425 - 7436
  • [5] Mesh repair in hiatal surgery: Surgical technique and early results in hiatal hernia repair
    Ertem, Metin
    Ozveri, Emel
    Gok, Hakan
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2011, 27 (04) : 222 - 226
  • [6] Impact of pre-existing mesh at the hiatus at revisional hiatal hernia surgery
    Barazanchi, Ahmed W. H.
    Chui, Juanita Noeline
    Bhimani, Nazim
    Leibman, Steven
    Smith, Garett
    DISEASES OF THE ESOPHAGUS, 2024, 37 (10)
  • [7] Proton Pump Inhibitor Use After Hiatal Hernia Repair: Inhibitor of Recurrent Symptoms and Potential Revisional Surgery
    Oppenheimer, Eittel E.
    Schmit, Bradley
    Sarosi, George A., Jr.
    Thomas, Ryan M.
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2020, 256 : 570 - 576
  • [8] Outcomes of Biosynthetic and Synthetic Mesh in Ventral Hernia Repair
    Sivaraj, Dharshan
    Fischer, Katharina S.
    Kim, Trudy S.
    Chen, Kellen
    Tigchelaar, Seth S.
    Trotsyuk, Artem A.
    Gurtner, Geoffrey C.
    Lee, Gordon K.
    Henn, Dominic
    Nazerali, Rahim S.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, 2022, 10 (12) : E4707
  • [9] Initial Outcomes of Laparoscopic Paraesophageal Hiatal Hernia Repair with Mesh
    Gebhart, Alana
    Vu, Steven
    Armstrong, Chris
    Smith, Brian R.
    Nguyen, Ninh T.
    AMERICAN SURGEON, 2013, 79 (10) : 1017 - 1021
  • [10] Laparoscopic management of large hiatal hernia: mesh method with the use of ProGrip mesh versus standard crural repair
    Ilyashenko, V. V.
    Grubnyk, Viktor V.
    Grubnik, V. V.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2018, 32 (08): : 3592 - 3598