Allied Health Professions in Research: The Forgotten Workforce

被引:0
作者
Baker, Sarah [1 ]
Ballantine, Lisa [2 ]
机构
[1] York & Scarborough Teaching Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, AHP Educ Training & Res, York, England
[2] York & Scarborough Teaching Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, York, England
来源
INTERNET JOURNAL OF ALLIED HEALTH SCIENCES AND PRACTICE | 2023年 / 21卷 / 04期
关键词
allied health occupations; health; research; health workforce;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: To understand the experience, involvement, and perceived importance of research among allied health professions and identify how robust research culture might be established in secondary care. Method: Analyses were carried out on quantitative and qualitative data using an online questionnaire disseminated to allied health professionals working in a national health service trust in the north of England. Logistic regression was used to ascertain whether Agenda for Change banding and profession significantly influenced research qualifications, experience, and interest. Qualitative data was analysed within a theoretical framework that focused on, career development, job satisfaction and clinical practice. Results: Educational attainment, research experience and interest were significantly greater among allied health professionals in higher Agenda for Change bands. Conclusions: Involvement in research provides allied health professionals opportunities for career development, job satisfaction and meaningful clinical impact. National Health Service Trusts should provide infrastructure to support research activity in recognition of their skills and potential to increase research capacity for the benefit of patients.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2017, Multiprofessional framework for advanced clinical practice in England
  • [2] Balas E.A., 2000, Yearbook of medical informatics 2000: Patient-centered systems
  • [3] Does the engagement of clinicians and organisations in research improve healthcare performance: a three-stage review
    Boaz, Annette
    Hanney, Stephen
    Jones, Teresa
    Soper, Bryony
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2015, 5 (12):
  • [4] One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis?
    Braun, Virginia
    Clarke, Victoria
    [J]. QUALITATIVE RESEARCH IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 18 (03) : 328 - 352
  • [5] A method for measuring individual research productivity in hospitals: development and feasibility
    Caminiti, Caterina
    Iezzi, Elisa
    Ghetti, Caterina
    De'Angelis, Gianluigi
    Ferrari, Carlo
    [J]. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2015, 15
  • [6] How do NHS organisations plan research capacity development? Strategies, strengths, and opportunities for improvement
    Gee, Melanie
    Cooke, Jo
    [J]. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2018, 18
  • [7] Green J., 2014, Qualitative methods for health research, V3rd, DOI DOI 10.1177/1049732305285708
  • [8] Developing a consolidated research framework for clinical allied health professionals practising in the UK
    Harris, Jennifer
    Grafton, Kate
    Cooke, Jo
    [J]. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [9] HCPC, 2017, HCPC Standards of education and training
  • [10] HCPC, HCPC Standards of proficiency