Global access to nomenclatural botanical resources: Evaluating open access availability

被引:4
作者
Nicolson, Nicky [1 ,4 ]
Trekels, Maarten [2 ]
Groom, Quentin J. [2 ]
Knapp, Sandra [3 ]
Paton, Alan J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Royal Bot Gardens, London, England
[2] Meise Bot Garden, Meise, Belgium
[3] Nat Hist Museum, London, England
[4] Royal Bot Gardens, Richmond, England
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
botanical nomenclature; GBIF; herbarium; open access; specimen; taxonomic distribution; types; vascular plants; PLANT; COLLECTIONS; NAMES; RECOMMENDATION; DIGITIZATION; COUNTRIES; HERBARIA; FUTURE;
D O I
10.1002/ppp3.10438
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Societal Impact StatementPrimary occurrence data ('what, where, when') enable study of species distribution and diversity, facilitating reactions to societal challenges from food security to climate change mitigation. Scientific names integrate information and are made concrete through reference to a type specimen. Research and conservation planning requires timely open access to this data. Around 2000 vascular plant species are described each year, and many are narrowly endemic and face conservation threats. Twenty-four percent of those published between 2012 and 2021 is available openly, and only 12% of taxa is represented by digitised type material served from within their native range. We make several recommendations to increase open access to this vital information to support prompt conservation action and future research.SummaryWe review access to literature and type specimens, key resources for taxonomic research. Takeup of open access (OA) publishing in plant naming is analysed using the International Plant Names Index (IPNI) data (2012-2021), and online availability of specimens analysed using the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF). Integration of the World Checklist of Vascular Plants (WCVP) taxonomy and distributional data is used to examine regional variation.We found that 23% of vascular plant names are published OA, and 41% are digitally undiscoverable: contained in bibliographic works without a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) or with an unresolvable DOI. The most common OA publishing model used is 'gold'.We also found that 30% of taxa are represented by a digitised type specimen mobilised from within the continent of their natural range and only 12% from the (more precise) country.We recommend clear article processing charge (APC) waivers for authors from low and middle income countries to better enable 'gold' OA and promotion of deposition repositories to better enable 'green' OA. Nomenclators should clearly indicate the OA status of literature and mobilise type citation data as material citations to aggregators like GBIF. Names registration systems should promote the capture of code-recommended elements such as catalogue numbers for type specimens. Digital mobilisation of specimen metadata and images from collections based in low- and middle-income countries must be accelerated to help increase in country taxonomic capacity to document and conserve plant diversity. Primary occurrence data ('what, where, when') enable study of species distribution and diversity, facilitating reactions to societal challenges from food security to climate change mitigation. Scientific names integrate information and are made concrete through reference to a type specimen. Research and conservation planning require timely open access to this data. Around 2000 vascular plant species are described each year, and many are narrowly endemic and face conservation threats. Twenty-four percent of those published between 2012 and 2021 is available openly, and only 12% of taxa is represented by digitised type material served from within their native range. We make several recommendations to increase open access to this vital information to support prompt conservation action and future research.image
引用
收藏
页码:899 / 907
页数:9
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] Agosti D., 2022, BIODIVERS INFORM, V6, DOI DOI 10.3897/BISS.6.91241
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1751, Philosophia botanica
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1976, Submission to the inquiry into the impact on the Australian environment of the current woodchip industry program
  • [4] Herbaria are a major frontier for species discovery
    Bebber, Daniel P.
    Carine, Mark A.
    Wood, John R. I.
    Wortley, Alexandra H.
    Harris, David J.
    Prance, Ghillean T.
    Davidse, Gerrit
    Paige, Jay
    Pennington, Terry D.
    Robson, Norman K. B.
    Scotland, Robert W.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2010, 107 (51) : 22169 - 22171
  • [5] Brummitt RK., 2001, WORLD GEOGRAPHICAL S
  • [6] Global models and predictions of plant diversity based on advanced machine learning techniques
    Cai, Lirong
    Kreft, Holger
    Taylor, Amanda
    Denelle, Pierre
    Schrader, Julian
    Essl, Franz
    van Kleunen, Mark
    Pergl, Jan
    Pysek, Petr
    Stein, Anke
    Winter, Marten
    Barcelona, Julie F.
    Fuentes, Nicol
    Inderjit
    Karger, Dirk Nikolaus
    Kartesz, John
    Kuprijanov, Andreij
    Nishino, Misako
    Nickrent, Daniel
    Nowak, Arkadiusz
    Patzelt, Annette
    Pelser, Pieter B.
    Singh, Paramjit
    Wieringa, Jan J.
    Weigelt, Patrick
    [J]. NEW PHYTOLOGIST, 2023, 237 (04) : 1432 - 1445
  • [7] Chan L., 2002, Budapest Open Access Initiative
  • [8] New scientific discoveries: Plants and fungi
    Cheek, Martin
    Lughadha, Eimear Nic
    Kirk, Paul
    Lindon, Heather
    Carretero, Julia
    Looney, Brian
    Douglas, Brian
    Haelewaters, Danny
    Gaya, Ester
    Llewellyn, Theo
    Ainsworth, A. Martyn
    Gafforov, Yusufjon
    Hyde, Kevin
    Crous, Pedro
    Hughes, Mark
    Walker, Barnaby E.
    Forzza, Rafaela Campostrini
    Wong, Khoon Meng
    Niskanen, Tuula
    [J]. PLANTS PEOPLE PLANET, 2020, 2 (05) : 371 - 388
  • [9] Christenhusz M. M., 2018, GLOBAL FLORA SPECI 2
  • [10] DAS S, 2018, J NAT SCI COLLECT, V6, P4