Comparison of Droperidol and Midazolam Versus Haloperidol and Lorazepam for Acute Agitation Management in the Emergency Department

被引:3
作者
Allen, Patrick J. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Johanson, Kendra E. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Reveles, Kelly R. [2 ,3 ]
Neff, Luke A. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Lock, Ashley E. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hlth, Dept Pharmacotherapy & Pharm Serv, Antonio, TX USA
[2] Univ Texas Austin, Coll Pharm, Pharmacotherapy Div, Austin, TX USA
[3] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr San Antonio, Pharmacotherapy Educ & Res Ctr, 7703 Floyd Curl Dr, San Antonio, TX 78229 USA
[4] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr San Antonio, Dept Emergency Med, San Antonio, TX 78229 USA
关键词
antipsychotics; benzodiazepines; acute agitation; emergency department; droperidol and midazolam; haloperidol and lorazepam; AMERICAN ASSOCIATION; CONSENSUS STATEMENT; OLANZAPINE; SEDATION; PATIENT;
D O I
10.1177/10600280231163192
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Background: Acute agitation accounts for up to 2.6% of visits to the emergency department (ED). To date, a standard of care for the management of acute agitation has not been established. Few studies have evaluated antipsychotic and benzodiazepine combinations. Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate effectiveness and safety of combination therapy for acute agitation with intramuscular (IM) droperidol and midazolam (D+M) compared with IM haloperidol and lorazepam (H+L) in patients in the ED. Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective medical record review of patients presenting to a large, academic ED with acute agitation from July 2020 through October 2021. The primary outcome was percentage of patients requiring additional agitation medication within 60 minutes of combination administration. Secondary outcomes included average time to repeat dose administration and average number of repeat doses required before ED discharge. Results: A total of 306 patients were included for analysis: 102 in the D+M group and 204 in the H+L group. Repeat dose within 60 minutes occurred in 7 (6.9%) and 28 (13.8%) patients in the D+M and H+L groups, respectively (P = 0.065). A total of 28.4% of D+M patients and 30.9% of H+L patients required any repeat dose during their ED visit. Time to repeat dose was 12 and 24 minutes in the D+M and H+L, respectively (P = 0.22). The adverse event rate was 2.9% in each group. Conclusion and Relevance: IM D+M resulted in a lower rate of repeat doses of acute agitation medication compared with IM H+L, though this was not statistically significant. Both therapies were safe, and the adverse event rate was low.
引用
收藏
页码:1367 / 1374
页数:8
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Rapid Agitation Control With Ketamine in the Emergency Department: A Blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial
    Barbic, David
    Andolfatto, Gary
    Grunau, Brian
    Scheuermeyer, Frank X.
    Macewan, Bill
    Qian, Hong
    Wong, Hubert
    Barbic, Skye P.
    Honer, William G.
    [J]. ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2021, 78 (06) : 788 - 795
  • [2] Droperidol V. haloperidol for sedation of aggressive behaviour in acute mental health: randomised controlled trial
    Calver, Leonie
    Drinkwater, Vincent
    Gupta, Rahul
    Page, Colin B.
    Isbister, Geoffrey K.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2015, 206 (03) : 223 - 228
  • [3] Intravenous Droperidol or Olanzapine as an Adjunct to Midazolam for the Acutely Agitated Patient: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial
    Chan, Esther W.
    Taylor, David M.
    Knott, Jonathan C.
    Phillips, Georgina A.
    Castle, David J.
    Kong, David C. M.
    [J]. ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2013, 61 (01) : 72 - 81
  • [4] Rapid tranquilization of the agitated patient in the emergency department: A systematic review and network meta-analysis
    deSouza, Ian S.
    Thode, Henry C., Jr.
    Shrestha, Pragati
    Allen, Robert
    Koos, Jessica
    Singer, Adam J.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2022, 51 : 363 - 373
  • [5] Research electronic data capture (REDCap)-A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support
    Harris, Paul A.
    Taylor, Robert
    Thielke, Robert
    Payne, Jonathon
    Gonzalez, Nathaniel
    Conde, Jose G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2009, 42 (02) : 377 - 381
  • [6] Randomized Controlled Trial of Intramuscular Droperidol Versus Midazolam for Violence and Acute Behavioral Disturbance: The DORM Study
    Isbister, Geoffrey K.
    Calver, Leonie A.
    Page, Colin B.
    Stokes, Barrie
    Bryant, Jenni L.
    Downes, Michael A.
    [J]. ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2010, 56 (04) : 392 - 401
  • [7] Efficacy of Combination Haloperidol, Lorazepam, and Diphenhydramine vs. Combination Haloperidol and Lorazepam in the Treatment of Acute Agitation: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study
    Jeffers, Trevor
    Darling, Brenna
    Edwards, Christopher
    Vadiei, Nina
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2022, 62 (04) : 516 - 523
  • [8] Droperidol for psychosis-induced aggression or agitation
    Khokhar, Mariam A.
    Rathbone, John
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2016, (12):
  • [9] Intramuscular Midazolam, Olanzapine, Ziprasidone, or Haloperidol for Treating Acute Agitation in the Emergency Department
    Klein, Lauren R.
    Driver, Brian E.
    Miner, James R.
    Martel, Marc L.
    Hessel, Michelle
    Collins, Jacob D.
    Horton, Gabriella B.
    Fagerstrom, Erik
    Satpathy, Rajesh
    [J]. ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2018, 72 (04) : 374 - 385
  • [10] Chemical agents for the sedation of agitated patients in the ED: a systematic review
    Korczak, Viola
    Kirby, Adrienne
    Gunja, Naren
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2016, 34 (12) : 2426 - 2431