Comparison of transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation versus percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation in category IIIB chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome: A randomized prospective trial

被引:5
|
作者
Sevim, Mehmet [1 ]
Alkis, Okan [1 ]
Kartal, Ibrahim Gueven [1 ]
Kazan, Huseyin Ozgur [1 ]
Ivelik, Halil Ibrahim [1 ]
Aras, Bekir [1 ]
Kabay, Sahin [2 ]
机构
[1] Kutahya Hlth Sci Univ, Fac Med, Dept Urol, Kutahya, Turkiye
[2] Altinbas Univ, Fac Med, Dept Urol, Istanbul, Turkiye
关键词
chronic pelvic pain syndrome; chronic prostatitis; percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation; transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation; SACRAL NEUROMODULATION; OVERACTIVE BLADDER; SYMPTOM INDEX; MANAGEMENT; EFFICIENCY; URINARY;
D O I
10.1002/pros.24513
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BackgroundChronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS) is a heterogenous condition that impacts the Quality of life severely, and it has multimodal complex treatment options. We aimed to compare the efficacy of two well-described neuromodulation therapies, transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS) versus percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) in the treatment of category IIIB CP/CPPS. MethodsThis study was designed as a randomized prospective clinical trial. We randomized category IIIB CP/CPPS patients into two treatment groups as TTNS and PTNS groups. Category IIIB CP/CPPS was diagnosed by two or four-glass Meares-Stamey test. All patients included in our study were antibiotic/anti-inflammatory resistant. Transcutaneous and percutaneous treatments were applied 30 min sessions for 12 weeks. Patients were evaluated by Turkish-validated National Health Institute Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIH-CPSI) and visual analogue scale (VAS) initially and after treatment. Treatment success was evaluated within each group and also compared with each other. ResultsA total of 38 patients in the TTNS group and 42 patients in the PTNS group were included in the final analysis. The mean VAS scores of the TTNS group were lower than the PTNS group initially (7.11 and 7.43, respectively), (p = 0.03). The pretreatment NIH-CPSI scores were similar between groups (p = 0.07). VAS scores, total NIH-CPSI, NIH-CPSI micturation, NIH-CPSI pain, and NIH-CPSI QoL scores decreased significantly at the end of the treatment in both groups. We found a significantly higher VAS and NIH-CPSI scores decrease in the PTNS group compared to the TTNS group (p < 0.01). ConclusionBoth PTNS and TTNS are effective treatment methods in category IIIB CP/CPPS. Comparing the two methods, PTNS provided a higher level of improvement in terms of pain and quality of life.
引用
收藏
页码:751 / 758
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Compliance with Percutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation at a Tertiary Academic Center versus a County Hospital
    Dong, Andy
    Nabavizadeh, Reza
    Jiang, James F.
    Washington, Samuel L.
    Master, Viraj A.
    JOURNAL OF HEALTH CARE FOR THE POOR AND UNDERSERVED, 2022, 33 (03) : 1569 - 1582
  • [42] Efficacy and Effectiveness of Percutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation in the Treatment of Pelvic Organ Disorders: A Systematic Review
    Biemans, Johanna M. A. E.
    van Balken, Michael R.
    NEUROMODULATION, 2013, 16 (01): : 25 - 34
  • [43] Percutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation as an Off-label Treatment of Clitoral Pain
    Elkattah, Rayan
    Trotter-Ross, Whitney
    Huffaker, Roland Keith
    FEMALE PELVIC MEDICINE AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2014, 20 (06): : E1 - E4
  • [44] Sacral nerve stimulation versus percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Simillis, Constantinos
    Lal, Nikhil
    Qiu, Shengyang
    Kontovounisios, Christos
    Rasheed, Shahnawaz
    Tan, Emile
    Tekkis, Paris P.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2018, 33 (05) : 645 - 648
  • [45] Sacral nerve stimulation versus percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Constantinos Simillis
    Nikhil Lal
    Shengyang Qiu
    Christos Kontovounisios
    Shahnawaz Rasheed
    Emile Tan
    Paris P. Tekkis
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 2018, 33 : 645 - 648
  • [46] Transcutaneous tibial nerve electrical stimulation versus vaginal electrical stimulation in women with overactive bladder syndrome: Is there a role for short-term interventions?
    de Oliveira Nunes, Janaina Mayer
    Gregorio, Emerson Pereira
    Moreira, Eliane Cristina Hilberath
    Hazime, Fuad Ahmad
    Averbeck, Marcio Augusto
    de Almeida, Silvio Henrique Maia
    NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, 2023, 42 (05) : 1101 - 1110
  • [47] Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation for the overactive bladder: A single-arm trial
    Kyaw, Hnin Yee
    Krause, Hannah G.
    Goh, Judith T. W.
    AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2024, : 501 - 505
  • [48] Efficacy of Acupuncture for Chronic Prostatitis/Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome A Randomized Trial
    Sun, Yuanjie
    Liu, Yan
    Liu, Baoyan
    Zhou, Kehua
    Yue, Zenghui
    Zhang, Wei
    Fu, Wenbin
    Yang, Jun
    Li, Ning
    He, Liyun
    Zang, Zhiwei
    Su, Tongsheng
    Fang, Jianqiao
    Ding, Yulong
    Qin, Zongshi
    Song, Hujie
    Hu, Hui
    Zhao, Hong
    Mo, Qian
    Zhou, Jing
    Wu, Jiani
    Liu, Xiaoxu
    Wang, Weiming
    Pang, Ran
    Chen, Huan
    Wang, Xinlu
    Liu, Zhishun
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2021, 174 (10) : 1357 - +
  • [49] Randomized Pilot Study: Anal Inserts Versus Percutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation in Patients With Fecal Incontinence
    Leo, Cosimo Alex
    Thomas, Gregory P.
    Hodgkinson, Jonathan D.
    Leeuwenburgh, Marjolein
    Bradshaw, Ellie
    Warusavitarne, Janindra
    Murphy, Jamie
    Vaizey, Carolynne J.
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2021, 64 (04) : 466 - 474
  • [50] Efficacy of sacral neuromodulation and percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation in the treatment of chronic nonobstructive urinary retention: A systematic review
    Ho, Felicia Ching Siew
    He, Carl
    Yao, Henry Han-, I
    O'Connell, Helen E.
    Gani, Johan
    NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, 2021, 40 (05) : 1078 - 1088