Comparison of transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation versus percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation in category IIIB chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome: A randomized prospective trial

被引:5
|
作者
Sevim, Mehmet [1 ]
Alkis, Okan [1 ]
Kartal, Ibrahim Gueven [1 ]
Kazan, Huseyin Ozgur [1 ]
Ivelik, Halil Ibrahim [1 ]
Aras, Bekir [1 ]
Kabay, Sahin [2 ]
机构
[1] Kutahya Hlth Sci Univ, Fac Med, Dept Urol, Kutahya, Turkiye
[2] Altinbas Univ, Fac Med, Dept Urol, Istanbul, Turkiye
关键词
chronic pelvic pain syndrome; chronic prostatitis; percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation; transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation; SACRAL NEUROMODULATION; OVERACTIVE BLADDER; SYMPTOM INDEX; MANAGEMENT; EFFICIENCY; URINARY;
D O I
10.1002/pros.24513
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BackgroundChronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS) is a heterogenous condition that impacts the Quality of life severely, and it has multimodal complex treatment options. We aimed to compare the efficacy of two well-described neuromodulation therapies, transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS) versus percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) in the treatment of category IIIB CP/CPPS. MethodsThis study was designed as a randomized prospective clinical trial. We randomized category IIIB CP/CPPS patients into two treatment groups as TTNS and PTNS groups. Category IIIB CP/CPPS was diagnosed by two or four-glass Meares-Stamey test. All patients included in our study were antibiotic/anti-inflammatory resistant. Transcutaneous and percutaneous treatments were applied 30 min sessions for 12 weeks. Patients were evaluated by Turkish-validated National Health Institute Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIH-CPSI) and visual analogue scale (VAS) initially and after treatment. Treatment success was evaluated within each group and also compared with each other. ResultsA total of 38 patients in the TTNS group and 42 patients in the PTNS group were included in the final analysis. The mean VAS scores of the TTNS group were lower than the PTNS group initially (7.11 and 7.43, respectively), (p = 0.03). The pretreatment NIH-CPSI scores were similar between groups (p = 0.07). VAS scores, total NIH-CPSI, NIH-CPSI micturation, NIH-CPSI pain, and NIH-CPSI QoL scores decreased significantly at the end of the treatment in both groups. We found a significantly higher VAS and NIH-CPSI scores decrease in the PTNS group compared to the TTNS group (p < 0.01). ConclusionBoth PTNS and TTNS are effective treatment methods in category IIIB CP/CPPS. Comparing the two methods, PTNS provided a higher level of improvement in terms of pain and quality of life.
引用
收藏
页码:751 / 758
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Is the addition of vaginal electrical stimulation to transcutaneous tibial nerve electrical stimulation more effective for overactive bladder treatment? A randomized controlled trial
    Ambrosano Giarreta, F. Bacchi
    Haddad, J. Milhem
    de Carvalho Fusco, H. C. Souza
    Baracat, E. Chada
    Casarotto, R. A.
    Goncalves Ferreira, E. Alves
    ACTAS UROLOGICAS ESPANOLAS, 2021, 45 (01): : 64 - 72
  • [32] Prospective and randomized comparison of electrical stimulation of the posterior tibial nerve versus oxybutynin versus their combination for treatment of women with overactive bladder syndrome
    Sophia C. Souto
    Leonardo O. Reis
    Thais Palma
    Paulo Palma
    Fernandes Denardi
    World Journal of Urology, 2014, 32 : 179 - 184
  • [33] Nerve stimulation for chronic pelvic pain and bladder pain syndrome: a systematic review
    Tirlapur, Seema A.
    Vlismas, Antonis
    Ball, Elizabeth
    Khan, Khalid S.
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2013, 92 (08) : 881 - 887
  • [34] Transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation versus parasacral stimulation in the treatment of overactive bladder in elderly people: a triple-blinded randomized controlled trial
    Jacomo, Raquel Henriques
    Alves, Aline Teixeira
    Lucio, Adeha
    Garcia, Patricia Azevedo
    Ramos Lorena, Dayanne Cristina
    de Sousa, Joao Batista
    CLINICS, 2020, 75
  • [35] Transcutaneous Electrical Tibial Nerve Stimulation in the Treatment of Fecal Incontinence: A Randomized Trial (Consort 1a)
    Leroi, A. M.
    Siproudhis, L.
    Etienney, I.
    Damon, H.
    Zerbib, F.
    Amarenco, G.
    Vitton, V.
    Faucheron, J. L.
    Thomas, C.
    Mion, F.
    Roumeguere, P.
    Gourcerol, G.
    Bouvier, M.
    Lallouche, K.
    Menard, J. F.
    Queralto, M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2012, 107 (12) : 1888 - 1896
  • [36] Effect of Transcutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation in Multiparous Egyptian Women with Vaginal Laxity: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Hady, Doaa A. Abdel
    ARCHIVES OF SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, 2025, 54 (03) : 1121 - 1128
  • [37] Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation versus tolterodine for overactive bladder in women: a randomised controlled trial
    Preyer, Oliver
    Umek, Wolfgang
    Laml, Thomas
    Bjelic-Radisic, Vesna
    Gabriel, Boris
    Mittlboeck, Martina
    Hanzal, Engelbert
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2015, 191 : 51 - 56
  • [38] A PROSPECTIVE SINGLE BLINDED PLACEBO CONTROLLED STUDY INTO THE ROLE OF PERCUTANEOUS AND TRANSCUTANEOUS TIBIAL NERVE STIMULATION FOR FAECAL INCONTINENCE
    George, A.
    Kalmar, K.
    Sala, S.
    Kokopoulis, K.
    Panarese, A.
    Nicholls, R. J.
    Vaizey, C. J.
    GUT, 2011, 60
  • [39] Percutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation Improves Female Sexual Function in Women With Overactive Bladder Syndrome
    Musco, Stefania
    Serati, Maurizio
    Lombardi, Giuseppe
    Lumi, Ermal
    Parisi, Annunziata Isabella
    Del Popolo, Giulio
    Agro, Enrico Finazzi
    JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, 2016, 13 (02) : 238 - 242
  • [40] Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation for the treatment of interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome: a pilot study
    Neha T Sudol
    Noelani Guaderrama
    Emily Adams-Piper
    Emily Whitcomb
    Felicia Lane
    International Urogynecology Journal, 2021, 32 : 2757 - 2764